I think the mistake lies in your selector.
#cart-contents is very likely nested *inside* the form, not surrounding
it - at least according to your html. So
#cart-contents form
... will probably not work as expected.
Try #cart-contents legend { visibility: hidden; } or { display: none;
}an
I tend to agree. Since .c2 is defined after .c1 it takes precendence
over the first declaration. AFAIK the order in which the classes are
defined within the attribute do not influence.
Far more than anyone could ever ask for is here:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15670631/does-the-order-o
Here's one way:
form {
display: table;
}
input, label {
display: table-cell;
}
Here's another:
form {
position: relative;
}
label {
position: absolute;
left: 2em;
}
In these examples I'm using the form itself for context
(table/positioning). If this collides with oth
Could we see some code, please?
Jørgen
Am 13.08.13 01:05, schrieb Karl DeSaulniers:
Hello all, I have a input check box and a label to the right of it. I
want it so that the text in the label does not wrap below the check
box but still wraps to the side. How can I do this? TIA.
Best,
___
Am 26.01.13 06:24, schrieb David Laakso:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:56 AM, Joergen Lang wrote:
Safari (6.02) appears to have an issue with resizing an image in a floated
list after encountering a media query breakpoint.
http://www.joergen-lang.de/testing/resize.html
Any hints, ideas
Hello everyone,
Safari (6.02) appears to have an issue with resizing an image in a
floated list after encountering a media query breakpoint.
Test case here:
http://www.joergen-lang.de/testing/resize.html
(see below for code)
When I reduce the window width the images scales down properly.
Hi Jan-Erik,
there are ways to do that. They are called attribute selectors and
adjacent sibling combinators.
Your structure:
Bla bla bla bla bla
So if wanted a special style for your figcaption you could write
something like this:
img[width="1024"] + figcaption {
border: 1px sol
Am 23.10.12 18:29, schrieb Al Sparber:
[...]
All CSS methods, except for "all-natural" CSS 3 methods, are hacks that
come with potential consequences such as the inability to support
same-page links or design limitations.
Your statements appear to be a little gernal. Could you please elaborat
Am 23.10.12 18:29, schrieb Al Sparber:
[...]
All CSS methods, except for "all-natural" CSS 3 methods, are hacks that
come with potential consequences such as the inability to support
same-page links or design limitations.
Your statements appear to be a little gernal. Could you please elaborat
Google is your friend. :o)
A search for "css equal height columns" should bring up some good results.
This article IMHO is a good starting point:
http://matthewjamestaylor.com/blog/equal-height-columns-cross-browser-css-no-hacks
hth,
Jørgen
Am 22.10.12 19:59, schrieb J.C. Berry:
Hello al
Am 22.10.12 20:13, schrieb Al Sparber:
[...]
I would like to extend one column of our site all the way to the
bottom of the varying middle column (first column always same length).
[...]
"CSS-only" methods would essentially be hacks like negative padding or
using borders.
The 'padding' pr
11 matches
Mail list logo
