Re: [css-d] on html and css versions

2012-08-01 Thread Josh Rehman
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Tedd Sperling t...@sperling.com wrote: Unfortunately/fortunately there are many choices, for example: http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/04/valid-dtd-list.html What is a novice to do? Can the choice be simple? What is wrong with using? !DOCTYPE html Nothing. Use

Re: [css-d] on html and css versions

2012-08-01 Thread Josh Rehman
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh e...@l-c-n.com wrote: Le 2 août 2012 à 06:03, Josh Rehman a écrit : And, actually the uppercase DOCTYPE is important as I've run into problems with the lowercase version in some browsers. That sounds weird. Can you clarify which browsers

Re: [css-d] font-size: 62.5% revisited

2012-07-31 Thread Josh Rehman
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fi wrote: 2012-07-31 3:32, Josh Rehman wrote: The screen resolution thing is a non-issue because the CSS px is defined to be an angular measure: The reality is different from the spec, as one can see from the discussion

Re: [css-d] font-size: 62.5% revisited

2012-07-31 Thread Josh Rehman
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fi wrote: 2012-07-31 20:43, Josh Rehman wrote: The reality is different from the spec, as one can see from the discussion of the topic in the relevant CSS3 draft: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-values/#absolute-lengths The px unit

Re: [css-d] font-size: 62.5% revisited

2012-07-30 Thread Josh Rehman
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:13 AM, David Hucklesby huckle...@gmail.comwrote: On 7/26/12 1:55 AM, Georg wrote: On 26.07.2012 06:06, David Hucklesby wrote: Perhaps this is just nonsense. But it just has to be better than 62.5%. I use Opera a lot, with a minimum text size of 12px--you'd be

[css-d] Where to put the width?

2008-06-04 Thread Josh Rehman
I'm currently working with code that has a table based layout. It's also templated such that peices of a page are in seperate physical files. Its difficult for me to do things like widen a column because the width of the column is specified 3 or 4 times, like this (pseudo-code): table

[css-d] IE6 positioning question

2008-06-02 Thread Josh Rehman
Hi there, I've been lurking on this list for a while, and have found the discussion to be very interesting and useful. Thank you. Now I have a question of my own. It seems that IE6 does not like my CSS (IE7, FF2, FF3, Safari, and Opera all seem to like it). I've taken care to isolate the

Re: [css-d] IE6 positioning question

2008-06-02 Thread Josh Rehman
What's also puzzling is that the last div always lays out differently than the rest. I'm sure that's a big clue but I'm not sure what it means. (back to reading quirksmode.org:) Josh Rehman wrote: Hi there, I've been lurking on this list for a while, and have found the discussion

Re: [css-d] IE6 positioning question

2008-06-02 Thread Josh Rehman
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: Josh Rehman wrote: http://www.javajosh.com-a.googlepages.com/pymk.html The key thing that troubled me with this layout was that I couldn't just float:right the pymk-x elt. As a workaround I used position:absolute; top:5px; right:0px; I still don't know why that doesn't

Re: [css-d] Skin Test Request

2008-05-25 Thread Josh Rehman
://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/ -- Josh Rehman http://javajosh.blogspot.com __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED