[css-d] ie6/7 shrink-wrapping with floated children

d for the wrong size to set an explicit width? Best regards Mike Wilson __ css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies --

Re: [css-d] relative positioning inside absolute positioned element - why not percentage for top?

EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Wilson > Sent: den 29 augusti 2007 09:26 > To: 'CSS-D' > Cc: 'Philippe Wittenbergh' > Subject: Re: [css-d] relative positioning inside absolute > positioned element - why not percentage for top? > > Just to close this issue

Re: [css-d] relative positioning inside absolute positioned element - why not percentage for top?

x27;s size. Though, this support is currently only available in IE but at least Mozilla has a bug report for it. Best regards Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of fantasai Sent: den 24 augusti 2007 09:11 To: Mike Wilson Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [css-d] relative positioning inside absolute positionedelement-why not percentage for top?

Thanks again for your input and for helping me understand this! > > But extending this reasoning to the offset properties, like > > left and top, seems unfair as they cannot cause any layout > > recursion. The child height and width may cause recursion > > as the parent element may base its ow

Re: [css-d] relative positioning inside absolute positionedelement- why not percentage for top?

Thanks for your insights Philippe! > > Or are you saying that the height of the containing block used for > > positioning will be different from the calculated size of the actual > > element? This doesn't seem to be the case as the other, absolutely > > pos'd, child DIV finds bottom:0 nicely. > >

Re: [css-d] relative positioning inside absolute positioned element- why not percentage for top?

[Forwarding Philippe's reply to the list] On May 10, 2007, at 4:57 PM, Mike Wilson wrote: > Or are you saying that the height of the containing block used for > positioning will be different from the calculated size of the actual > element? This doesn't seem to be th

Re: [css-d] relative positioning inside absolute positioned element- why not percentage for top?

Hi Philippe, I have put a new test file on http://lahall.se/test/test-top-percentage.html > How much offset for top do you actually expect ? Half (50%) of the DIV's height (both DIVs have the same height as the outer DIV adapts to the inner DIV's size). > CSS 2.1, 9.3.2 Box offsets > For 'top'

[css-d] relative positioning inside absolute positioned element - why not percentage for top?

I have a problem with relative positioning, containing block, and percentages. I have an absolutely positioned outer DIV, and a relatively positioned inner DIV. My goal is to shift the inner DIV halfway to the left and up, using percentages. See code below: http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dt