At 20:02 -0600 on 11/28/2014, Karl DeSaulniers wrote about Re:
[css-d] Drop Menu failing on most Mobile Phones:
Yes. jQuery can make this work.
Note that jQuery IS JS (under the covers) so the query of if JS is
the only method that will work is answered since use of jQuery
implies use of
At 08:02 -0400 on 07/31/2014, Chris Rockwell wrote about [css-d] Fwd:
Re: Web fonts:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Chris Rockwell ch...@chrisrockwell.com
Date: Jul 30, 2014 10:36 PM
Subject: Re: [css-d] Web fonts
To: Stuart King zinlo...@gmail.com
Cc:
Here is the culprit:
At 14:08 -0400 on 07/09/2014, Tom Livingston wrote about Re: [css-d]
P tag can't be child of label ?:
If you wrap the input with the label, you can leave off the
'for' attribute (just read that... had no idea about that one!).
The use of the for attribute allows the label to not need to wrap
Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
At 14:08 -0400 on 07/09/2014, Tom Livingston wrote about Re:
[css-d] P tag can't be child of label ?:
If you wrap the input with the label, you can leave off the
'for' attribute (just read that... had no idea about that one!).
The use of the for attribute allows
At 14:01 -0500 on 06/16/2014, Richard Wendrock Forum wrote about Re:
[css-d] font-variant:small-caps;:
I used David's suggestion to solve the problem. Assuming Arial does
not have small-caps variants, I switched to font-family: Verdana,
Geneva, sans-serif; and that solved the problem. Thank
At 11:24 +0100 on 02/17/2014, Peter H. wrote about Re: [css-d] Will
the unsemantic HTML elements B and I be so:
It's also true that the browser by default draws an italic font for
'emphasis' and a bold font for 'strong' so the result is equally
presentational. Dunno why they couldn't have
At 13:59 -0500 on 02/14/2014, Chris Williams wrote about Re: [css-d]
hiding things and bandwidth?:
AFAIK, there are but two choices:
1) A mobile version of the page/site, users get redirected there based on
client and you only load as needed for each client. This has a number of
issues:
At 18:18 -0800 on 12/20/2013, John wrote about Re: [css-d] child
problems with li?:
On Dec 20, 2013, at 6:00 PM, John j...@coffeeonmars.com wrote:
at this page: thinkplan.org the footer li nav appears to be
being influenced by the header nav li CSS and I can not see whyany
clues?
At 20:17 +0100 on 10/01/2013, Philip Taylor wrote about Re: [css-d]
Two classes, two conflicting rules, which wins :
Chris Rockwell wrote:
That is why it works that way, yes.
The engine sees two widths, both with the same weight, origin and
specificity; the last one to be declared will
At 10:51 -0400 on 09/22/2013, Tom Livingston wrote about Re: [css-d]
Where do you cut-off your browser support?:
But
we recently had a client ask (tell) us to support IE7 as that's what
they use internally still and, according to their own stats, have a
significant user base on 7.
Of course
At 14:52 +0100 on 09/06/2013, Philip Taylor wrote about Re: [css-d]
html email with css:
What I do think is pandering to the manufacturers
is using inline styles because they are too lazy to parse styles found
in the head region, repeating styles in inner elements because they
are too lazy to
At 23:17 +0100 on 06/20/2013, Philip Taylor wrote about Re: [css-d]
accents on e in Resume:
Incidentally, as you can type e-acute (é) in your e-mail, why
not enter them the same way in your web page ? I assume you
are working in UTF-8 and not ASCII/ISO-8859-1.
This letter is part of the
At 19:45 +0100 on 11/06/2012, =?UTF-8?B?U3VzYW5uZSBKw6RnZXI=?= wrote
about Re: [css-d] Trumping bad proprietary code.:
But all other methods have a real effect (and side effects), that may
not fit in a special environment. zoom: 1; is wonderful meaningless, it
does nothing (beside fixing a
At 15:25 + on 11/06/2012, Philip TAYLOR wrote about [css-d]
Trumping bad proprietary code.:
Wishing (as always) to keep my sites 100% W3C standards compliant,
I am stuck with a bad property in proprietary code. The offending
rule reads :
.qmmc {position:relative;zoom:1;}
Just
At 16:57 -0400 on 08/01/2012, Tedd Sperling wrote about Re: [css-d]
on html and css versions:
What is wrong with using?
!DOCTYPE html
Sure it doesn't have a *real* DTD, but the W3C validator does
somehow validate pages that have this DOCTYPE declaration, right?
So, there must be some sort
At 14:11 +0300 on 07/22/2012, sweepslate wrote about [css-d]
non-English characters: omit accents when using tex:
I want to text-transform:uppercase a piece of text writen in Greek.
The Greek language requires that:
a. in lower case text, some letters need to have accents --and
b. in
At 11:53 -0400 on 06/29/2012, Tom Livingston wrote about [css-d]
font-face declarations:
I got the following from FontSquirrel:
@font-face {
font-family: 'AlegreyaRegular';
src: url('Alegreya-Regular-webfont.eot');
src: url('Alegreya-Regular-webfont.eot?#iefix')
At 23:41 +0200 on 04/24/2012, Gabriele Romanato wrote about Re:
[css-d] Responsive Design Issue:
Why should we get rid of a piece of design when you have a CSS3 property
for that? Use background-size. It works.
Maybe since use of background-size assumes/requires that the device's
browser
At 17:32 -0600 on 04/14/2012, Debbie Campbell wrote about [css-d]
question on media queries and full screen browsers:
I'm using media queries for desktop vs. tablet vs. smartphone on my
site (and the media query code is taken directly from the developer
of the Lynda.com adaptive design
At 08:32 + on 03/23/2012, Luis Cabral wrote about [css-d] How to
make a div fill the height of an iframe:
Hello,
I have the following scenario:
- An iframe that has fixed width and height and is absolutely
positioned in the middle of the screen (simulating a modal pop up
window)- The
20 matches
Mail list logo
