On 5/30/2013 3:02 PM, Christopher Akins wrote:
I'm almost embarrassed to admit I don't know why this is happening since
I've worked with CSS for a number of years now. I don't claim to be a CSS
master, though! :-)
On this page:
www.springfieldmo.gov/logos/
I have several floated items that
On 8/30/2013 5:06 PM, John A. Johnson wrote:
On Aug 30, 2013, at 2:02 PM, Chris Rockwell wrote:
No, that is the problem. You commented out the opening of you tablet mq, but
not the closing.
well that seems to have fixed one problem; the mobile MQ break to at least
happen. I see my 960 la
On 9/9/2013 12:36 PM, Eric A. Meyer wrote:
On 14 Jan 2000, at 18:55, Carl Peterson wrote:
Ccgeg(1(!(eg(:efffvdgv),?1sfgbhxc .)$hvhjFjfhgfzjfgxhsxdffxxfc
ujirr
ffnxmcgddhhh
BhhgucuvvvcvvgghDjhc jbvvhicg
Sorry, everyone; I only just now saw this and have taken the
usual action. And while
On 11/11/2013 12:33 PM, Theresa Jennings wrote:
Deconstruct at your leisure.
http://pattle.github.io/simpsons-in-css/
I had no idea CSS could do this. I need to get out more.
someone has WAY too much time on his/her hands.
But, it is a masterful display of CSS
bill
...
Fluid/flexible layouts are, IMO, best. Like you mention, new devices
are coming out all the time. Percentage width on your structure help
you cover all the varying widths. Start mobile first, and adjust
layout with breakpoints when the *content* requires it. Sometimes a
single column is all y
On 11/13/2013 7:26 AM, william drescher wrote:
...
Fluid/flexible layouts are, IMO, best. Like you mention, new
devices
are coming out all the time. Percentage width on your structure
help
you cover all the varying widths. Start mobile first, and adjust
layout with breakpoints when the *content
On 10/24/2014 11:21 PM, J.C. Berry wrote:
Thanks, just to clarify. It's supposed to be smooth. I didn't know how to
describe it other than jump and the radiology one is seamless..
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 8:17 PM, David Laakso
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:49 PM, J.C. Berry
wrote:
Hello
My wife is vision impaired. I am writing a web application for
her. How can I style the page so it displays at 300%. I can
increase the fontsize, but then it does not increase the size of
the form elements. I want to increase everything.
Changing the dpi of the display works, but then it i
On 5/28/2016 8:08 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
On May 28, 2016, at 7:38 PM, william drescher wrote:
My wife is vision impaired. I am writing a web application for her. How can I
style the page so it displays at 300%. I can increase the fontsize, but then
it does not increase the size
On 5/29/2016 9:13 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
On May 29, 2016, at 6:49 PM, william drescher wrote:
That works nicely except the radio buttons stay small.
Try setting width and height on those:
[type=checkbox], [type=radio] { width: 1rem; height: 1rem; }
Or something like that
On 5/29/2016 10:35 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
On May 30, 2016, at 3:02 AM, william drescher wrote:
On 5/29/2016 9:13 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
On May 29, 2016, at 6:49 PM, william drescher wrote:
That works nicely except the radio buttons stay small.
Try setting width and
On 7/22/2016 8:38 PM, John J wrote:
Can anyone shed light on the concept of the setting of default border
properties? I may be suffering the effects of this on some elements which
ought to be following the same css, but which seem not to be; differing
border code might be the reason.
Thank you!
I have:
Since the most recent update of Firefox the checkboxes and
On 6/17/2017 6:48 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
On Jun 18, 2017, at 6:53 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
Yes I have. I had to use it once when mobile phones were styling my submit
buttons and not letting my style be applied.
It would allow the color, but not the appearance like borders and sha
On 6/18/2017 9:21 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
On Jun 18, 2017, at 7:56 PM, william drescher wrote:
The original problem was that firefox sized the radio buttones and checkboxes
very small and ignored the
"html {font-size 2.2 rem}" for them.
I am writing this for an intranet
15 matches
Mail list logo