I also think you're convinced it's an absolute path issue but it's not.
You get an error message because I'm a WP and it's PHP driven and
directories just work a little differently - people just cant get direct
access to a directory on WP, just because it exist - it just doesn't
work
Really you had two issues going on. First was your pathing issue
which prevented the rest of us from seeing the problem (unless we hadthe font
installed) and you did get that corrected for creampuff and I
was able to verify that the font is now downloading properly with no
errors.
The
Hi Everyone,
Am working on a coming soon page for my site and @font-face doesn't seem to be
working. Not sure why .I implemented @font-face on another project and it was
fine. Now it's not working for this. I am using a different font now - could
this have something to do with it?
Elli
Yes, of course it could. A huge number of things could have gone wrong
— without an example it is almost impossible to provide helpful
advice.
However:
• Often, it's just a misplaced file issue: the fonts are in the wrong
directory relative to the stylesheet with the declaration, or said
Hi Barney!
Ok so I tested on latest versions of Chrome, Opera, Safari for Windows,
IE9, IE8, IE7 and they are all rendering the font. It's in FF where I'm
having the problem. I tested in both FF3.6 9 and what you see on those
versions of FF, is the fallback font (Brush Script STD) of
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Elli Vizcaino elli...@yahoo.com wrote:
Ok so I tested on latest versions of Chrome, Opera, Safari for Windows, IE9,
IE8, IE7 and they are all rendering the font. It's in FF where I'm having the
problem. I tested in both FF3.6 9 and what you see on those
Ok so I tested on latest versions of Chrome, Opera, Safari for Windows,
IE9, IE8, IE7 and they are all rendering the font. It's in FF where I'm
having the problem. I tested in both FF3.6 9 and what you see on those
versions of FF, is the fallback font (Brush Script STD) of the font
Elli Vizcaino wrote:
The font is in its own directory. The link you provided places the the fonts
directory within the CSS directory. I don't know why it's a problem this time
around because the way I wrote my CSS code is exactly how I used it in another
project
The font is in its own directory. The link you provided places the the fonts
directory within the CSS directory. I don't know why it's a problem this time
around because the way I wrote my CSS code is exactly how I used it in
another project (http://www.e7flux.com/clients/sof/) and it
Elli,
As Philip Taylor has correctly pointed out, the URI you used in your
style sheet is a relative URI.
The CSS specification (http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/syndata.html#uri) has
this to say about relative URIs:
For CSS style sheets, the base URI is that of the style sheet, not that
of the
On 01/05/2012, at 8:52 AM, Joergen W. Lang wrote:
For future projects you might also consider using a web font service such as
Fontsquirrel to avoid other web font-related issues.
What are the other web font-related issues you refer to here?
KathyW.
Elli,
As Philip Taylor has correctly pointed out, the URI you used in your
style sheet is a relative URI.
The CSS specification (http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/syndata.html#uri) has
this to say about relative URIs:
For CSS style sheets, the base URI is that of the style sheet, not that
The font is in its own directory. The link you provided places the the
fonts directory within the CSS directory. I don't know why it's a
problem this time around because the way I wrote my CSS code is exactly how I
used it in another project (http://www.e7flux.com/clients/sof/) and it
Am 04.01.12 23:26, schrieb Kathy Wheeler:
On 01/05/2012, at 8:52 AM, Joergen W. Lang wrote:
For future projects you might also consider using a web font
service such as Fontsquirrel to avoid other web font-related
issues.
What are the other web font-related issues you refer to here?
Are you sure it's working in your other project
(http://www.e7flux.com/clients/sof/)? Because when i go to that site
I get the same error message in chrome for littledays.ttf and that
font definitely does not show up. Your issue is you're using the
relative src from where the css is
On Wednesday 2012-01-04 11:16 -0800, Elli Vizcaino wrote:
Ok so I tested on latest versions of Chrome, Opera, Safari for
Windows, IE9, IE8, IE7 and they are all rendering the font. It's
in FF where I'm having the problem. I tested in both FF3.6 9 and
what you see on those versions of FF, is
On Firefox, in the Web Console (open it with Tools - Web Developer
- Web Console prior to loading the page), I see the error message:
downloadable font: rejected by sanitizer (font-family: creampuff
style:normal weight:normal stretch:normal src index:0) source:
Am 05.01.12 01:05, schrieb Kathy Wheeler:
On 01/05/2012, at 9:53 AM, Joergen W. Lang wrote:
Am 04.01.12 23:26, schrieb Kathy Wheeler:
On 01/05/2012, at 8:52 AM, Joergen W. Lang wrote:
For future projects you might also consider using a web font
service such as Fontsquirrel to avoid other
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Elli Vizcaino elli...@yahoo.com wrote:
Can you tell me what version of Chrome and OS you're viewing from? And have
you checked it out in any other browsers? Because it was never an issue
before. The link had been up for discussion in another post a couple of
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Elli Vizcaino elli...@yahoo.com wrote:
Can you tell me what version of Chrome and OS you're viewing from? And
have you checked it out in any other browsers? Because it was never an issue
before. The link had been up for discussion in another post a couple of
When you use a path like fonts/creampuff.ttf that is
relative to where your css file is located at and so the browser is
going to look in
http://www.e7flux.com/e7flux2012/css/fonts/creampuff.ttf.
I also think you're convinced it's an absolute path issue but it's not. You get
an error
Am working on a coming soon page for my site and @font-face doesn't seem to
be working. Not sure why .I implemented @font-face on another project and it
was fine. Now it's not working for this. I am using a different font now -
could this have something to do with it?
I believe you need
Elli Vizcaino wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Elli Vizcaino elli...@yahoo.com wrote:
Can you tell me what version of Chrome and OS you're viewing from? And
have you checked it out in any other browsers? Because it was never an issue
before. The link had been up for discussion in
On my computer (ubuntu), there was absolutely no styling of any
element on the page. It might have something to do with the CSS error?
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http://chelseacreekstudio.com/indexx.phpprofile=css3
~Chetan
Chetan Crasta wrote:
On my computer (ubuntu), there was absolutely no styling of any
element on the page.
I get the same thing, no styles: Windows XP + Firefox 4.
Rob
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
Did both you and Rob reduce the window width to 400px
as suggested ? Strange things happen when you do that
in Seamonkey 2.0.11 under Win/XP;SP3 @ 1152 x 864
Philip Taylor
Chetan Crasta wrote:
On my computer (ubuntu), there was absolutely no styling of any
element on the page. It
On 1/6/11 9:39 AM, Rob Crowther wrote:
Chetan Crasta wrote:
On my computer (ubuntu), there was absolutely no styling of any
element on the page.
I get the same thing, no styles: Windows XP + Firefox 4.
Rob
Drag the page to a 400px window and the styles will kick-in.
~d
--
On Thursday, January 06, 2011 09:21:22 am David Laakso wrote:
Re: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/indexx.php [intentional spelling]
Please drag to an approximately 400px window.
FF/3.6.13 and SeaMonkey render sans, rather than the intended
slab-serif, for the heading About on the index and
On 06/01/11 14:44, David Laakso wrote
Drag the page to a 400px window and the styles will kick-in.
~d
What happens if you take the @font-face rule out of the media query? I
wonder if Gecko doesn't like that being nested?
Rob
On 1/6/11 10:04 AM, Rob Crowther wrote:
On 06/01/11 14:44, David Laakso wrote
Drag the page to a 400px window and the styles will kick-in.
~d
What happens if you take the @font-face rule out of the media query?
I wonder if Gecko doesn't like that being nested?
Rob
Bingo [repeatedly
On Jan 6, 2011, at 11:21 PM, David Laakso wrote:
Re: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/indexx.php [intentional spelling]
Please drag to an approximately 400px window.
You can't have a @rule inside another @rule. Move the @font-face block outside
of the @media block and Gecko will see your
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Rob Crowther robe...@boogdesign.com wrote:
What happens if you take the @font-face rule out of the media query? I
wonder if Gecko doesn't like that being nested?
Rob
Hmm, it works if the fall back font-families are removed.
32 matches
Mail list logo
