Am 06.03.2012 01:31 schrieb David Laakso:
First pass: desktop, laptop, tablet, mobile [signature link]..
Your constructive comments and suggestions are always appreciated.
I like it. 2 points that came to my mind:
- I personnally would prefer to have the main navigation on every page,
so I
First pass: desktop, laptop, tablet, mobile [signature link]..
Your constructive comments and suggestions are always appreciated.
Best,
~d
--
Chelsea Creek Studio
http://ccstudi.com
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
First pass: desktop, laptop, tablet, mobile [signature link]..
Your constructive comments and suggestions are always appreciated.
Best,
Jean Nicolas Arthur Rimbaud
Charleville, Ardennes
--
Chelsea Creek Studio
http://ccstudi.com
Looks good on desktop running FF7 / IE9.
pozdrawiam,
Tomasz Borek
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies --
On 11/7/11 11:35 AM, Tomasz Borek wrote:
Looks good on desktop running FF7 / IE9.
pozdrawiam,
Tomasz Borek
Thank you, Tomasz.
Best,
Anaïs Nin
Paris
--
Desktop. Laptop. Tablet. Mobile!
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
__
Desktop. Laptop. Tablet. Mobile.
Constructive comments and suggestions are always appreciated.
markup
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/mobile/
css
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/mobile/mhr/css/style.css
Thank you.
Best wishes,
Anaïs Nin
Paris
--
Desktop. Laptop. Tablet. Mobile!
On 11/5/11 3:48 AM, Gail Issen wrote:
Looks very good on my iPhone!
That is good new, Gail. No iPhone hereabout [carrier problems]. Running
a low-end Andriod/2.2.2 touch-screen this end.
Thank you.
Anaïs Nin
--
Desktop. Laptop. Tablet. Mobile!
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
Your comments and suggestions are always appreciated.
uri: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
Expanded 'pane' is stacked higher than fixed 'nav', thus covers it when
expanded on short windows.
Setting 'z-index: 2' on 'nav' should fix that minor flaw, but I haven't
tested.
regards
A first-pass attempt to hit cross-browser desktop, tablets, and
mobile-handsets from one address. Your comments and suggestions are
always appreciated.
uri: http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
Thanks.
Best,
~d
__
css-discuss
At 10:53 PM -0400 4/17/10, David Laakso wrote:
Comments and suggestions are [almost] always appreciated.
markup
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ann/
css
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ann/css/style.css
As ever,
Quasimodo
David:
As always, you are a master at what you do. I love the layout (lot's
tedd wrote:
At 10:53 PM -0400 4/17/10, David Laakso wrote:
markup
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ann/
Quasimodo
David:
I would opt for a slide-show for the costumes -- something like this:
http://sperling.com/examples/image-replacement/
or this:
http://webbytedd.com/c/fade-cycle/
Comments and suggestions are [almost] always appreciated.
markup
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ann/
css
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ann/css/style.css
As ever,
Quasimodo
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
I'd appreciate your comments and suggestions on this site.
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
Best,
~d
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ --
it seems to lean to the right (more white space on left than right)
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 2:01 PM, David Laakso
da...@chelseacreekstudio.comwrote:
I'd appreciate your comments and suggestions on this site.
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
Best,
~d
Hi David,
This is my favorite style of site clean easy to use and quick to load.
My only comment is that it has more white space on the left than the right
and personaly I find that throws its balance out for me.
The 3 sets are very cool but possably a discription for people that are not
Hi David,
I particularly like the visual impact of the site. It is both engaging
and minimalist at the same time. The upper part of each page is
consistent. I have mixed feelings about large images (the lights)
pushing content lower on the page. The images of the lights are
attractive, but
Theresa Newman wrote:
it seems to lean to the right (more white space on left than right)
I'd appreciate your comments and suggestions on this site.
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
Best,
~d
It is very like most everything else, including chimneys. They lean due
to the tilt of
When the Portfolio page is selected, and all the examples push out to
the left, the content is nearly perfectly centered.
Bill B
Theresa Newman wrote:
it seems to lean to the right (more white space on left than right)
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 2:01 PM, David Laakso
Hi David
White is better. And the second About (vertical) why ?
body {
-x-system-font:none;
font-family:'Helvetica Neue',Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;
font-size:100%;
font-size-adjust:none;
font-stretch:normal;
font-style:normal;
font-variant:normal;
font-weight:normal;
line-height:1.425;
David Laakso wrote:
I'd appreciate your comments and suggestions on this site.
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
Question: do you mean STRONG or *BOLD* when you code...
pstrongBelow are/strong thumbnail images..
...? (You know what I mean ;-) )
Also, IMO the horizontal line should be
Luis Speciale wrote:
Hi David
White is better. And the second About (vertical) why ?
trimmed
Cordially
Luis
Luis,
I probably should know, but when it comes right down to it, your reply
is so cryptic that I have no idea what you are getting at. Sorry.
Best,
~d
--
Everything has such a delicate, feminine look to it, except for the
image outlines. Big chunky charcoal gray image outlines. Big chunkyHRs
(or border-top, or border-bottom). In juxtaposition to Zapfino, with
very thin thins, and thicks that aren't nearly as thick as the outlines.
Theresa
david,
technically and from an infrastructure design perspective, it's
masterfully done (not that i could really tell).
but your copy really sucks and really doesn't betray the level of work
that you do. how long have you been at this?
did you put nearly as much time into the content
On 23/12/2009, at 8:08 AM, David Laakso wrote:
David Laakso wrote:
I'd appreciate your comments and suggestions on this site.
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
David, I loved it before and I still love it now. There are a few
things that I would like to see changed though.
1. Your
David Laakso wrote:
I'd appreciate your comments and suggestions on this site.
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
Looking good.
On a side note. For IE6, I thought that maybe the below CSS would stop
with some confusion for IE6 users on the portfolio page.
* html h3.ex {display: none;}
or
*
Theresa Mesa wrote:
Everything has such a delicate, feminine look to it, except for the
image outlines. Big chunky charcoal gray image outlines. Big chunkyHRs
(or border-top, or border-bottom). In juxtaposition to Zapfino, with
very thin thins, and thicks that aren't nearly as thick as
Alan Gresley wrote:
David Laakso wrote:
I'd appreciate your comments and suggestions on this site.
http://chelseacreekstudio.com/
Looking good.
On a side note. For IE6, I thought that maybe the below CSS would stop
with some confusion for IE6 users on the portfolio page.
*
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 8:56 PM, Theresa Mesa trixiesirishe...@gmail.comwrote:
I dunno...the site is causing some cognitive dissonance for me. I'm
also a fine artist, a commissioned portraitist, and textile artist, in
addition to being a graphic designer and web designer. Looking at
Russell
.
__
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org --
29 matches
Mail list logo
