Re: [css-d] Site check: formever.org

Jasper, Thank you for responding. > I am new to this list so I'm not sure about the scope of a "site > check" may be or not be, but personally I don't care for the design in > general. Can you be more specific about what it is you don't like? I'd be very interested to hear a negative critique of

Re: [css-d] Site check: formever.org

Holly Bergevin wrote: > From: Dave M G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> http://formever.org > >> IE6 is dead to me now. If you mean that in the sense that IE6 won't be getting any more bug fixes to address CSS-related problems, that's fine. > While this is certainly your, and your clients choice not t

Re: [css-d] Site check: formever.org

I am new to this list so I'm not sure about the scope of a "site check" may be or not be, but personally I don't care for the design in general. Interesting the comments in relates posts about "forward looking", when the design itself is not. ___

Re: [css-d] Site check: formever.org

Dave M G wrote: > David L, David G,Felix, > > After I posted my last message, I took a look at the prices for the > browser viewing service. Definitely out of my price range. I guess > I'll just have to keep politely asking here on this list for help... OK. Don't wait for my offer to let you know

Re: [css-d] Site check: formever.org

On 2007/04/26 13:02 (GMT-0400) Dave M G apparently typed: > After I posted my last message, I took a look at the prices for the > browser viewing service. Definitely out of my price range. I guess I'll > just have to keep politely asking here on this list for help... Running Linux need not be a

Re: [css-d] Site check: formever.org

David L, David G,Felix, Thank you for your clarifications and comments. David L: There is no now, but there will be lots of in dynamic content, so I think that's okay. Fair point about the validation buttons. The theory is, though, that the site will validate, so hopefully those nit pickers

Re: [css-d] Site check: formever.org

On 2007/04/26 12:55 (GMT+0900) Dave M G apparently typed: > I've settled on a design that I'm happy with, and I'd like to invite > people to make comments, both technical and artistic. > http://formever.org > As far as technical commentary goes: > It should display correctly in FireFox. I'm usi

Re: [css-d] Site check: formever.org

Dave M G wrote: > Lori, David, CSS-d, > > Thank you very much for your comments, and taking the time to be so > helpful. If it's not too much to bear, I have some follow up questions. > >>> FWIW, a level 2 heading is missing. > I'm sorry, what does this mean? RE: It i

Re: [css-d] Site check: formever.org

Dave M G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 26 Apr 2007 09:08:25 -0500, wrote: Site looks OK in the browsers listed below. To stop the design breaking below 400px, you might consider giving the body both a min-width: x; where x is a sufficient number of pixels to hold the page unbroken. You could use

Re: [css-d] Site check: formever.org

Lori, David, CSS-d, Thank you very much for your comments, and taking the time to be so helpful. If it's not too much to bear, I have some follow up questions. >> FWIW, a level 2 heading is missing. I'm sorry, what does this mean? >> Ditch the validation buttons? Really? I tried to make th

[css-d] Site check: formever.org

From: Dave M G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >http://formever.org > IE6 is dead to me now. While this is certainly your, and your clients choice not to support IE6, it seems a little shortsighted. I'd to point out just a couple of things. First, there are undoubtedly many, many people who _cannot_ run I

Re: [css-d] Site check: formever.org

~davidLaakso wrote: > Dave M G wrote: > >> CSS-d, >> >> I've settled on a design that I'm happy with, and I'd like to invite >> people to make comments, both technical and artistic. >> >> The site is here: >> http://formever.org >> >> > FWIW, a level 2 heading is missing. > Ditch the va

Re: [css-d] Site check: formever.org

Dave M G wrote: > CSS-d, > > I've settled on a design that I'm happy with, and I'd like to invite > people to make comments, both technical and artistic. > > The site is here: > http://formever.org > FWIW, a level 2 heading is missing. Ditch the validation buttons? A little slow loading the ima

[css-d] Site check: formever.org

CSS-d, I've settled on a design that I'm happy with, and I'd like to invite people to make comments, both technical and artistic. The site is here: http://formever.org As far as technical commentary goes: It should display correctly in FireFox. I'm using Linux, so I'd be happy to hear from peo