At 10:51 AM +0100 4/2/09, Martyn Merrett wrote:
>Could this *finally* be the end of IE6 and our CSS woes?
>
>http://weblog.200ok.com.au/2009/03/putting-ie6-out-to-pasture.html
css-d isn't the right place to argue about which browsers one
should or shouldn't support/test in/care about, which too often
borders on being a religious discussion.
css-d is the right place to work out solutions to CSS problems in
browsers, and work out the limitations in CSS support in browsers,
and by "browsers" I mean any browser that has some level of CSS
support.
So let's not debate the linked article here, please. Thank you.
--
Eric A. Meyer (http://meyerweb.com/eric/), List Chaperone
"CSS is much too interesting and elegant to be not taken seriously."
-- Martina Kosloff (http://mako4css.com/)
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [cs...@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
