In case anyone wonders why Felix and Chris and some of the other regulars
keep emphasizing the point of respecting the user's font size - and
designing your page to allow for different font sizes - I experienced a
vivid illustration of this last night.
I've been shopping for a car, mostly looking
> Regardless which of the possibilities applies in any given case, the
> state may be either smaller, or larger, or the same as, the size
> preferred by the designer.
I agree there are many obstacles in the way of creating the "perfect" layout,
but the designers preference should always be of sec
On 2008/12/10 09:35 (GMT) Chris Taylor composed:
>> From: MEM
>> 2) Not letting the design experience (that should also be for the user)
>> be ruined with some default options that the user may have?
> I think this is looking at the problem the wrong way. While designers may
> have a preferred f
> From: MEM
> Sent: 10 December 2008 09:12
> Subject: [css-d] About The font size...
>
> 2) Not letting the design experience (that should
> also be for the user) be ruined with some default options that the user
> may have?
I think this is looking at the problem the wrong
I've notice that the main gurus of this mailing-list are always telling us:
"pay attention to user options and let the browser do the math".
Those are not totally separate statements I believe, but, about the user
options, even if the most of the users don't even know about the font-size
option, i
