Re: [css-d] Adblocker and css classes/ids

2012-02-19 Thread Michael Adams
On Monday 20 February 2012 07:08, Graham Hays wrote: > Hi Barney (ad anyone else) > > Personally I'm not a lover of random classnames (or filenames) - if > a class does something then I call it that. > > The problem I had was that this wasn't an advert as such - on our > site we had used the folder

Re: [css-d] Adblocker and css classes/ids

2012-02-19 Thread Graham Hays
Hi Barney (ad anyone else) Personally I'm not a lover of random classnames (or filenames) - if a class does something then I call it that. The problem I had was that this wasn't an advert as such - on our site we had used the folder name "advertising" to hold pages relevant to clients enquiries (

Re: [css-d] Adblocker and css classes/ids

2012-02-19 Thread Barney Carroll
Graham, I think one of the main points of AdBlock is that it is independent from advertisers – the other is that it blocks ads. I know you believe that your ads shouldn't be blocked, but AdBlock don't provide general help on how to bypass their efforts. Having said that, why not just use arbitrar

[css-d] Adblocker and css classes/ids

2012-02-19 Thread Graham Hays
Hi all Can anyone advise if there is a master list somewhere of id and class names that should be avoided It may be obvious but I've just experienced problems with Firefox and its Ad Blocker addon - it disables anything with a class of "advertise" and "advertising" (which we had used in our adver