With regard only to the markup question, use the w3c markup validation
service.
http://validator.w3.org/
Your home page markup validates-- I did not check the inside pages...
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1uri=http%3A%2F%2Firisweb.net%2Femily%2F
Fwiw, it is usually best to use
Averill Ring at Irisweb wrote:
Fwiw, it is usually best to use a strict doctype for a new site.
Why?
Because it will help you (the page author) identify
out-of-date and/or deprecated practices (if you
validate the page, but not otherwise, unless your
authoring tool is DOCTYPE sensitive).
Averill Ring at Irisweb wrote:
Fwiw, it is usually best to use a strict doctype for a new site.
Why?
Averill
Because HTML 4.01 Strict [and XHTML 1.0 Strict] emphasize structure over
presentation and they are /forward/ compatible.
Best,
~d
--
:: desktop and mobile ::
On 17 Aug 10 13:32 PM, David Laakso wrote:
Averill Ring at Irisweb wrote:
Fwiw, it is usually best to use a strict doctype for a new site.
Why?
Because HTML 4.01 Strict [and XHTML 1.0 Strict] emphasize structure over
presentation and they are /forward/ compatible.
Also, I believe it is
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 16:48 -0400, Reese wrote:
On 17 Aug 10 13:32 PM, David Laakso wrote:
Averill Ring at Irisweb wrote:
Fwiw, it is usually best to use a strict doctype for a new site.
Why?
Because HTML 4.01 Strict [and XHTML 1.0 Strict] emphasize structure over
presentation
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Erica Cavin ecav...@verizon.net wrote:
I use transitional when I want to use have links open in a new window
with target=blank. Strict doesn't allow target=blank. If there's a
better way to have a link open in a new window under strict I'd prefer
to use
I use transitional when I want to use have links open in a new window
with target=blank. Strict doesn't allow target=blank. If
there's a
better way to have a link open in a new window under strict I'd
prefer
to use that.
As Michael said, target=blank is different than target=_blank.
I could use some suggestions with this site
http://irisweb.net/emily
Three things:
1) In validating the pages, I keep getting this same error message:
previous problem http://www.totalvalidator.com/validator/Validator#p0E649
http://www.totalvalidator.com/validator/Validator#E649 The
Averill Ring at Irisweb wrote:
I could use some suggestions with this site
http://irisweb.net/emily
Three things:
1) In validating the pages, I keep getting this same error message:
previous problem http://www.totalvalidator.com/validator/Validator#p0E649
Averill Ring at Irisweb wrote:
I could use some suggestions with this site
http://irisweb.net/emily
There's always a difference between the font rendering from IE8 to FF, IE
always looking larger and bolder. Is there a fix for this?
Averill Ring
Is IE at default?
IE/8
On 2010/08/11 16:24 (GMT-0400) Averill Ring at Irisweb composed:
2) There's always a difference between the font rendering from IE8 to FF, IE
always looking larger and bolder. Is there a fix for this?
As to boldness difference:
I use Windows so little I'm rusty on specifics, but IIRC, IE8
Averill Ring at Irisweb wrote:
I could use some suggestions with this site
http://irisweb.net/emily
I've tried to get the bottom of the right column to line up vertically with
the bottom of the left column. If I make a height declaration for
#contentright it drops it down and renders it
Averill Ring wrote:
David, you ... trimmed
Averill
I could use some suggestions with this site
http://irisweb.net/emily
Averill Ring
Averill,
O.K. I hope it works out for you.
It is a good to reply to the list as others may wish to express their
opinion.
Best,
~d
PS
13 matches
Mail list logo
