Den 13.08.2017 23.04, skrev Ezequiel Garzón:
What a treat, Georg! THIS kind of insight is what I was hoping for.
I'll try to accept the standards more as a given and not to think too
much about foundational issues, though sometimes these aspects
intrigue me.
I get that. Curiosity is good ...
What a treat, Georg! THIS kind of insight is what I was hoping for.
I'll try to accept the standards more as a given and not to think too
much about foundational issues, though sometimes these aspects
intrigue me. For instance, and as an aside, while it's commonly
claimed that floats were not
Den 12.08.2017 20.52, skrev Ezequiel Garzón:
Georg, while I haven't gone over the standard in depth, I assumed the
rendering I saw in all browsers was compliant, and in that sense
logical and expected. I was shooting for something along the lines of
why you think it was defined this way.
Well,
IE8 used to do (i.e they
> misinterpreted box model) but people said it is wrong so now we have
> box-sizing. Microsoft won here as far as I am concerned.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 7/8/17, Ezequiel Garzón <garzon.luc...@gmail.c
css-d] Basic questions about the box model
To: "css-discuss" <css-d@lists.css-discuss.org>
Date: Monday, 7 August, 2017, 0:41
Greetings to all! I can see I'm not
understanding the box model
correctly considering this basic
example:
#green {
background-color: green;
width: 1
Den 07.08.2017 01.41, skrev Ezequiel Garzón:
Wouldn't it make more sense for the word "Red" not to be visible at all,
considering it
comfortably fits its hidden box? I'm sure the specs dictate this
behavior, but I'm looking for some rationale, specially given that
overlaps and hidden stuff are
Greetings to all! I can see I'm not understanding the box model
correctly considering this basic example:
#green {
background-color: green;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
float: left; }
#red {
background-color: red;
width: 100px;
height: 100px; }
Green
Red
I can understand that
