Hi people, I just wondered if people had an opinion about the
alternative of using hacks/conditional statements, php or js to
account for browser variation?
Obviously, if you dont need php, there's no point using php for
browser variations. But checking the user agent header in php doesn't
seem to
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Dougie McGilvray
wrote:
> Hi people, I just wondered if people had an opinion about the
> alternative of using hacks/conditional statements, php or js to
> account for browser variation?
Whenever I need to target only IE, I use Conditional Comments. I have
found t
> Is it just a case of using the right tool for the job? It would seem
> logical to me - if you are using PHP anyway of course - to check the
> user-agent header and add a class to the body tag? I realise people
> can change the header sent by their browser, but how many people
> actually do that?
On 1/6/11 12:23 PM, Thierry Koblentz wrote:
Is it just a case of using the right tool for the job? It would seem
logical to me - if you are using PHP anyway of course - to check the
user-agent header and add a class to the body tag? I realise people
can change the header sent by their browser, bu
Hi people, I just wondered if people had an opinion about the
alternative of using hacks/conditional statements, php or js to
account for browser variation?
My opinion is that browser variations have to be fairly large to bother,
but of course: designers often do, so we need methods for maki
