Jasper, I believe you can find the formula for a block expanding
horizontally to fill its container on this page:
http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visudet.html
Regards,
Paul
At 02:14 PM 6/8/2005, Jasper Kuperus wrote:
Hmm I get your point. So when I just don't specify any width. It works out
exactl
Jasper Kuperus wrote:
> My question about this hack is, is this a real hack? And if it is, is
> it a new hack or is it a known hack?
I may be wrong but the minus sign just kills the declaration.
Doesn't it behave the same with no width at all?
Thierry | http://www.TJKDesign.com
__
Jasper Kuperus schrieb:
> http://shirmanos.student.utwente.nl/~jasper/index.php?id=5
My question about this hack is, is this a real hack? And if it is, is it
a new hack or is it a known hack?
width: 100% -;
forces FF to drop this declaration. Note what the Javascript Console of
Firefox say
Hmm I get your point. So when I just don't specify any width. It works
out exactly the same. So I believe this isn't a hack after all.
But my next question now is, will it always be parsed like this? If you
don't insert a width rule at all, will it always stretch the whole width?
- Jasper
Pa
At 01:20 PM 6/8/2005, Jasper Kuperus wrote:
When I was redesigning my homepage I found a CSS hack. Because I couldn't
find anything about this hack, it seemed to me that this hack isn't known
yet. So I named it after my homepage: The Curunir Hack.
http://shirmanos.student.utwente.nl/~jasper/in
Hello all,
When I was redesigning my homepage I found a CSS hack. Because I
couldn't find anything about this hack, it seemed to me that this hack
isn't known yet. So I named it after my homepage: The Curunir Hack.
Want to know more about this hack? Read my page about this hack:
http://shirm
