Hi John:
> I would have guessed this is the way to go about it. Maybe you can give
> the a class and then assign it a background-image ? Although, I'm not
> sure that's the best route.
you know what, i shouldn't have written the question to begin with, just
moving too fast (or faster than my
I would have guessed this is the way to go about it. Maybe you can give
the a class and then assign it a background-image ? Although, I'm not
sure that's the best route.
On 3/16/07, Donna Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hi all, i, and a couple of friends, are trying to figure out a
> "des
hi all, i, and a couple of friends, are trying to figure out a
"descentant selector" issue.
say you have this in the css:
#content li a img {border: 2px solid green;}
your html is
some words
with Firefox the image is styled. With IE7 or 6 it is not. I am leary
about the "logic" an
Thanks Glenn, Rob, and Tyson. I can now start writing cleaner, more
sensible CSS and HTML!
Cheers,
Dagmar
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss
On May 3, 2006, at 5:56 AM, Dagmar Noll wrote:
> #header ul
> #header p
> #header img
> #sections h1
> #sections h2
> #section p
>
> If this is valid CSS, are there any major red flags regarding using
> descendant selectors based on IDs?
All of the above will work perfectly. However, keep in min
Hi all.
Are descendant selectors based off of IDs valid CSS?
In case I am not using the right language (please set me straight if I'm
not), I mean this:
#header ul
#header p
#header img
#sections h1
#sections h2
#section p
If this is valid CSS, are there any major red flags regarding using
de
> a selector of "p"
> would be sufficient to uniquely identify the needed
> element. But let's
> say there's another paragraph elsewhere on the page;
> in that case,
> "#header p" would be sufficient because #header has
> to be unique if
> you're using valid markup.
Great explanation! I pret
Robert Neville wrote:
Can you add descendant ID selectors to an ID selector?
#container #header, #container #footer
Yes, but you may not always need to include the containing element in
your selector. Because id's are unique per page, you may not need the
added specificity a compound selecto
On 14 Jun 2005, at 9:40 am, Robert Neville wrote:
Can you add descendant ID selectors to an ID selector?
#container #header, #container #footer
Yes.
But it is not often needed: an ID selector is always unique on a page
anyway.
Would a better approach be the ID selector with the
class sele
I have a quick question about descendant selectors.
Even though the following site
(http://css.maxdesign.com.au/selectutorial/) has given
me considerable insight, this question relates to
additional clarification when nesting selectors.
Can you add descendant ID selectors to an ID selector?
#con
> > Both the CSS and XHTML are valid. Here's the link to the page:
> >
> > http://chnm.gmu.edu/history120/new/nav-test.html
>
> this is the ruleset for your current state
>
> #pre18thcentury a#nav-pre18,
> #18thcentury a#nav-18,
> #19thcentury a#nav-19,
> #20thcentury a#nav-20 {
> background-po
Jeremy Boggs schrieb:
I'm trying to create a navigation bar using images as tabs, and using
the conditional descendant selectors to choose the "current" link. I
have an unordered list of four links:
...
the a tag's background image is 80px high. the non-current state as a
background position of
I'm trying to create a navigation bar using images as tabs, and using
the conditional descendant selectors to choose the "current" link. I
have an unordered list of four links:
Pre-18th
18th
19th
20th
the a tag's background image is 80px high. the non-current state as a
background position of 0
13 matches
Mail list logo
