Re: [css-d] Descendant Selectors Based on IDs

2006-05-04 Thread Dagmar Noll
Thanks Glenn, Rob, and Tyson. I can now start writing cleaner, more sensible CSS and HTML! Cheers, Dagmar __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss

Re: [css-d] Descendant Selectors Based on IDs

2006-05-03 Thread Tyson Tate
On May 3, 2006, at 5:56 AM, Dagmar Noll wrote: > #header ul > #header p > #header img > #sections h1 > #sections h2 > #section p > > If this is valid CSS, are there any major red flags regarding using > descendant selectors based on IDs? All of the above will work perfectly. However, keep in min

[css-d] Descendant Selectors Based on IDs

2006-05-03 Thread Dagmar Noll
Hi all. Are descendant selectors based off of IDs valid CSS? In case I am not using the right language (please set me straight if I'm not), I mean this: #header ul #header p #header img #sections h1 #sections h2 #section p If this is valid CSS, are there any major red flags regarding using de