> On 12/09/11 14:19, Elli Vizcaino wrote:
>>
>> No, what I mean is FF 4& 5 were the 2 offered for testing on both
> Windows and Mac via Adobe Browser Labs. I'm still on version 3.6 on my own
> machine because the upgrade to FF4 was incompatible with Firebug and I
> didn't want to compromis
On 12/09/11 14:19, Elli Vizcaino wrote:
No, what I mean is FF 4& 5 were the 2 offered for testing on both Windows and Mac
via Adobe Browser Labs. I'm still on version 3.6 on my own machine because the upgrade
to FF4 was incompatible with Firebug and I didn't want to compromise my development
> I don't think I one either but this talk of FF3, FF4 and FF5 has got me
> confused.
>
> On Windows 7, FF4 was replaced within a week by FF5 and FF5 lasted about 2
> months. I now have FF6.0.2 on my machine. There is no mention of which build
> of
> Gecko this is. Are you saying that there
On 12/09/2011 4:20 AM, Beth Lee wrote:
Yes, that helps and there was never any real problem other than
that in Mac OS X 10.4 FF/3.6.22.
Not true. The problem was showing up in Vista
FF/4.something-or-other, and I'm no deviant.
I don't think I one either but this talk of FF3, FF4 and FF5 h
