bj wrote:
>> Entered by Microsoft on 4/21/2006
>> This was logged as a suggestion for future IE versions. We've already
>> added support for min-height and it is in the March 20 Beta 2 Preview
>> build that we put out during MIX06.
>>
>
> Did anyone else notice that NOTHING is said about mi
>Entered by Microsoft on 4/21/2006
>This was logged as a suggestion for future IE versions. We've already
>added support for min-height and it is in the March 20 Beta 2 Preview
>build that we put out during MIX06.
Did anyone else notice that NOTHING is said about min-width, max-width or
max-he
Robert O'Rourke wrote:
> Hooray!
>
> Thats a load off my mind. I picked a fun time to get into web
> development =]
Yes.
> Time to update the wiki re. min/max then.
You seem to have overlooked the "Fixed in Mar20:" comment.
It is implemented [1], it works well, but it adds haslayout.
IE7
cj wrote:
> On 6/2/06, Zoe M. Gillenwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> No, IE7 now respects height. So, all those Holly Hacks with height: 1%
>> will need to be hidden from it or altered. However, I'm not sure if IE7
>> supports min-height (can't remember!).
>>
>
> yes it does and the la
> Rob,
>
> No, IE7 now respects height. So, all those Holly Hacks with height: 1%
> will need to be hidden from it or altered. However, I'm not sure if IE7
> supports min-height (can't remember!).
>
> Zoe
What a nightmare! According to the wiki IE7beta2 does not support
min/max rules yet:
On 6/2/06, Zoe M. Gillenwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, IE7 now respects height. So, all those Holly Hacks with height: 1%
> will need to be hidden from it or altered. However, I'm not sure if IE7
> supports min-height (can't remember!).
yes it does and the latest beta has it :). for thos
Robert O'Rourke wrote:
> I've just done some reading up on min/max stuff in IE7 and it seems
> it's not in the beta yet but they are working on it. Does anyone know if
> IE7 still expands elements with a fixed height if their content overflows?
>
Rob,
No, IE7 now respects height. So, all