Re: [css-d] IE7 Pseudoclass/hasLayout Weirdness

2006-11-03 Thread Steve Clason
Bruno Fassino wrote: > Steve Clason wrote: > >> Although IE7 does support the :hover pseudoclass on elements other than >> , making Suckerfish-type navigation work without JavaScript, you >> have to be careful to trigger "hasLayout" in both the element and the >> element pseudoclass, and you ha

Re: [css-d] IE7 Pseudoclass/hasLayout Weirdness

2006-10-31 Thread Bruno Fassino
Steve Clason wrote: > Although IE7 does support the :hover pseudoclass on elements other than > , making Suckerfish-type navigation work without JavaScript, you > have to be careful to trigger "hasLayout" in both the element and the > element pseudoclass, and you have to use two different trigg

Re: [css-d] IE7 Pseudoclass/hasLayout Weirdness

2006-10-30 Thread Al Sparber
From: "Steve Clason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hi List, > > I spent a lot of time on this today and figured I should share. > > Although IE7 does support the :hover pseudoclass on elements other > than > , making Suckerfish-type navigation work without JavaScript, you > have to be careful to trigger

[css-d] IE7 Pseudoclass/hasLayout Weirdness

2006-10-30 Thread Steve Clason
Hi List, I spent a lot of time on this today and figured I should share. Although IE7 does support the :hover pseudoclass on elements other than , making Suckerfish-type navigation work without JavaScript, you have to be careful to trigger "hasLayout" in both the element and the element pse