Chris Chen wrote:
>> Sounds like you want to replace a perfectly good browser-feature
>> with something that's doesn't work half as well, but that's not my
>> problem.
>
>
> So, in the new CSS era, using is not considered a misuse
> of presentation tag inside HTML? (If so, I'll just keep
> consi
>Sounds like you want to replace a perfectly good browser-feature with
>something that's doesn't work half as well, but that's not my problem.
So, in the new CSS era, using is not considered a misuse of
presentation tag inside HTML? (If so, I'll just keep consientiously using
.)
Thanks,
Chris
Chris Chen wrote:
>> It's a simple website: http://www.formosagolfclub.com
>>
>> Basically I don't want the user ever having to scroll the browser
>> vertically, but only the content section itself. Looks like
>> is still the best way to do this. So is 100%
>> valid structural HTML and not de
>(1) what about the problem recommends as a solution in the
first
>place? (not a skeptical question here, just askin'...) And (2), have you
>considered s?
>
>Do you have a demo we could look at?
It's a simple website: http://www.formosagolfclub.com
Basically I don't want the user ever having
>(1) what about the problem recommends as a solution in the first
>place? (not a skeptical question here, just askin'...) And (2), have you
>considered s?
>
>Do you have a demo we could look at?
It's a simple website: http://www.formosagolfclub.com
Basically I don't want the user ever having
Hi Chris,
On Mar 6, 2007, at 12:35 AM, Chris Chen wrote:
> Is there a recommended way to do in-frame navigation with CSS
> (replacement for )?
Navigation isn't a concern of CSS, which has to do with presentation.
But you knew that already :-)... Questions I would have, given that you
are lo
Hi,
Is there a recommended way to do in-frame navigation with CSS (replacement
for )? Currently I am implementing that by toggling s between
"display: block" and "display: none". Two annoying things are:
(1) This looks like an ugly hack to me. Objection?
(2) Ideally the menu list should be do
