Re: [css-d] Nav technique suggestion (the good link)

Hi Adam, This testpage should be working ok (the other is on 'seems to be dead server'. This one should be ok though. Tested it for sure. added: - active state and focus support (inspired by Stu Nicholls) used background states lent from hover states (works g

Re: [css-d] Nav technique suggestion

Hi Adam, Here is a testpage that covers the links allready. Will be back tonight after some testing on all the current browsers. Some pointers and ideas though: - the layout seems to hold ok(see browser testing above, too earl

Re: [css-d] Nav technique suggestion

The problem with that is, of course, that it is a very nice font, and italic, and substituting plain text would seriously degrade the graphic design. That said, what exactly do you need sliding doors for if you are using a graphic which is already presized? On 9/9/05, CJ Larson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [css-d] Nav technique suggestion

Adam Helweh wrote: > I wanted to try and use what I have seen referred to as the "sliding > doors" technique for this sites navigation. > > http://www.lice-control.com/layout.htm I may be wrong, but I believe the "sliding doors" effect is for *horizontal* nav bars. Also, it deals with images and *

RE: [css-d] Nav technique suggestion

[A little bit off the topic you are specifically referring to:] One possible change you might make would be to take the text out of the graphic and make it actual text, since the text isn't changing between normal and :hover states. This would help the accessibility of your site in that screen re

[css-d] Nav technique suggestion

I wanted to try and use what I have seen referred to as the "sliding doors" technique for this sites navigation. http://www.lice-control.com/layout.htm When I tried it at first it didn't quite work. This is mainly due to where the A:Link or tag and where its placed. Here is all of the nav t