Re: [css-d] Root relative in Background URL

2007-12-18 Thread David Hucklesby
> On 17/12/2007, Bob Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked: >> Is it permissible to use root relative addresses in the background statement? >> On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:50:12 +, David Dorward wrote: > > Relative URIs in stylesheets are relative to the stylesheet, not the HTML > document that > incl

Re: [css-d] Root relative in Background URL

2007-12-18 Thread Big Moxy
Bob, I have used root relative addresses without any problems. tim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Cohen Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 3:27 PM To: CSS-Discuss List Subject: [css-d] Root relative in Background URL Is it permissible

Re: [css-d] Root relative in Background URL

2007-12-18 Thread Bob Cohen
On Dec 17, 2007, at 7:19 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > > Your syntax '/img/bg_2.gif' should work correctly, assuming that the > folder and the image are there where they should be: a folder child > of the root folder on the server. > > When I check > http://mojotools.com/img/bg_2.gif > I

Re: [css-d] Root relative in Background URL

2007-12-18 Thread David Dorward
On 17/12/2007, Bob Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is it permissible to use root relative addresses in the background > statement? Of course. > The display breaks in CSSEdit's previewer and when I check the file in > Firefox locally. Root relative URIs don't really work outside the context of

[css-d] Root relative in Background URL

2007-12-17 Thread Bob Cohen
Is it permissible to use root relative addresses in the background statement? My CSS file is in a subdir off of root, e.g., /css. Images are in a subdir off of root, e.g., /img. My template works when using a relative URL, e.g., #container { width: 100%; float: left;