On Aug 10, 2014, at 7:34 PM, Eric wrote:
> Hope they've seen the MS press release about EOLing IE 8 in about 18 months
> ;-)
>
> Eric
>
> http://www.zdnet.com/microsoft-to-drop-support-for-older-versions-of-internet-explorer-732437/?s_cid=e589&ttag=e589&ftag=TREc64629f
As choirs of Angels
Hope they've seen the MS press release about EOLing IE 8 in about 18 months ;-)
Eric
http://www.zdnet.com/microsoft-to-drop-support-for-older-versions-of-internet-explorer-732437/?s_cid=e589&ttag=e589&ftag=TREc64629f
> On August 7, 2014 at 7:00 PM Tom Livingston wrote:
>
>
> Our clients sti
Our clients still use IE8. I think all most all of them. That's the
only reason that matters to my superiors, or my clients.
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Eric wrote:
> I realize that this thread has gone off in other direction but I have a
> question -
>
> Given that SVG is support universally
I realize that this thread has gone off in other direction but I have a question
-
Given that SVG is support universally except for very ancient UAs (IE8 is south
of 5% now) why bother with a fallback image? Why not just give them a
background-color?
Seems like a whole lot of wasted work for a dr
Of course, YMMV, but like I said, if you're already using modernizr - which
also includes the html5shiv - it's trivial to handle this svg situation.
On Tuesday, August 5, 2014, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
> On Aug 5, 2014, at 8:19 PM, Tom Livingston > wrote:
>
> > If you're already using modernizr,
On Aug 5, 2014, at 8:19 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> If you're already using modernizr, it's even easier.
>
Na, I don't normally use those libraries unless I can't roll my own or it's
just more feasible to do so.
Too much excess code for stuff I am not utilizing in a project.
Best,
Karl DeSa
If you're already using modernizr, it's even easier.
On Tuesday, August 5, 2014, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
> That is an interesting find, thank you for sharing.
> I am still a little partial to the js solution as it checks things before
> anything is loaded, but if your a css purist, this is gold.
That is an interesting find, thank you for sharing.
I am still a little partial to the js solution as it checks things before
anything is loaded, but if your a css purist, this is gold. ;)
Best,
Karl DeSaulniers
Design Drumm
http://designdrumm.com
On Aug 5, 2014, at 8:11 PM, Tom Livingston w
Most likely, yes.
On Tuesday, August 5, 2014, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
> I see. But so I can wrap my head around this, without the media queries,
> that is what this css declaration does?
>
> Karl DeSaulniers
> Design Drumm
> http://designdrumm.com
>
>
>
> On Aug 5, 2014, at 8:08 PM, Tom Livingst
I see. But so I can wrap my head around this, without the media queries, that
is what this css declaration does?
Karl DeSaulniers
Design Drumm
http://designdrumm.com
On Aug 5, 2014, at 8:08 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> These were simple examples. In practice, I'd add MQ to stop that from
> h
These were simple examples. In practice, I'd add MQ to stop that from
happening in most browsers.
On Tuesday, August 5, 2014, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
> So with this, my browser, if it supports svg has to download your png and
> then your svg?
>
> Best,
>
> Karl DeSaulniers
> Design Drumm
> http:
So with this, my browser, if it supports svg has to download your png and then
your svg?
Best,
Karl DeSaulniers
Design Drumm
http://designdrumm.com
On Aug 5, 2014, at 7:45 PM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> Background: url(image.png);
> background-image: url(image.svg), none;
On Tuesday, August 5, 2014, Chris Rockwell wrote:
> Hey Tom, just a heads up that you need to include the 2nd argument in
> background-image:, otherwise it won't fallback.
>
>
> Ah yes. Correct.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456
Le 6 août 2014 à 09:45, Tom Livingston a écrit :
> Actually, now that I see the difference between this and rgba with rgb
> fallback, I see the best non-script solution is:
>
> Background: url(image.png);
> background-image: url(image.svg);
>
> See here:
> http://callmenick.com/2014/04/02/svg-
Hey Tom, just a heads up that you need to include the 2nd argument in
background-image:, otherwise it won't fallback.
Chris
On Aug 5, 2014 8:45 PM, "Tom Livingston" wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 5, 2014, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
>
> > On Aug 5, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh > > wrote:
>
On Tuesday, August 5, 2014, Karl DeSaulniers wrote:
> On Aug 5, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh > wrote:
>
> >
> > Le 6 août 2014 à 06:40, Karl DeSaulniers > a écrit :
> >
> >> urn your svg image into a base64 and load the image data as content:
> "". Wouldn't that work?
> >
> > No, that
On Aug 5, 2014, at 6:15 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>
> Le 6 août 2014 à 06:40, Karl DeSaulniers a écrit :
>
>> urn your svg image into a base64 and load the image data as content: "".
>> Wouldn't that work?
>
> No, that wouldn't work any differently. A browser that doesn't support SVG
Le 6 août 2014 à 06:40, Karl DeSaulniers a écrit :
> urn your svg image into a base64 and load the image data as content: "".
> Wouldn't that work?
No, that wouldn't work any differently. A browser that doesn't support SVG will
see an invalid / unrecognised image format as content of the back
Turn your svg image into a base64 and load the image data as content: "".
Wouldn't that work?
Karl
Sent from losPhone
> On Aug 5, 2014, at 8:18 AM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
>
>
>> Le 5 août 2014 à 22:00, Tom Livingston a écrit :
>>
>> was having a discussion in the comments of an articl
Ok, I see the difference. Thanks all.
On Tuesday, August 5, 2014, Chris Rockwell wrote:
> They do work the same. You're not giving it a declaration it doesn't
> understand ( like rgba(), therefore causing a fallback ), it perfectly
> understands url(), it just can't render the resource you're g
They do work the same. You're not giving it a declaration it doesn't
understand ( like rgba(), therefore causing a fallback ), it perfectly
understands url(), it just can't render the resource you're giving it.
Chris Rockwell
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
> I've seen t
Le 5 août 2014 à 22:00, Tom Livingston a écrit :
> was having a discussion in the comments of an article about using
> svg as a background-image in CSS, and using a png as fallback. I was
> writing it like this:
>
> background-image: image.png;
> background-image: image.svg;
>
> But this fail
I've seen that and others. I'm looking for why. Why don't they work the
same.
On Tuesday, August 5, 2014, Chris Rockwell wrote:
> Have you seen this, Tom: http://css-tricks.com/svg-fallbacks/ ?
>
> Scroll down about 1/2 way for the `background-image` fallback; Basically
> you have to fake multip
Have you seen this, Tom: http://css-tricks.com/svg-fallbacks/ ?
Scroll down about 1/2 way for the `background-image` fallback; Basically
you have to fake multiple backgrounds, but it doesn't work in Android 2.3,
if that's a concern.
So:
background-image: url('image.png');
background-image: url('i
List,
I was having a discussion in the comments of an article about using
svg as a background-image in CSS, and using a png as fallback. I was
writing it like this:
background-image: image.png;
background-image: image.svg;
But this fails in IE8 (and presumably in other non-svg-supporting browser
25 matches
Mail list logo
