Re: [css-d] What the "X" is going on?

2007-09-07 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Rafael wrote: > I wonder, do you have an example of validated XHTML markup that's not > "perfect"? I.e. markup that, although validated, it's broken XHTML? > Personally, it's all I do, validated as XHTML Strict (after all, > that's why I'm writing). I don't have a list of valid but not working XH

Re: [css-d] What the "X" is going on?

2007-09-07 Thread Rafael
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: > Tigdh Glesain wrote >> Am I worrying unnecessarily? Do any of have any 'jeez' to go with my >> 'whine'? (O: >> > > You have good reasons to worry if your work either isn't up to _perfect_ > XHTML standard from the very start, or someone else may lower its > quality in

Re: [css-d] What the "X" is going on? [medium]

2007-09-07 Thread Rafael
Geoffrey Sneddon wrote: > On 7 Sep 2007, at 16:44, Rafael wrote: >> # XHTML *does* promote more separation of content and presentation that >> HTML does, since it doesn't allow most of the presentational attributes >> anymore (e.g "align") and some of the presentation tags (e.g. "font"). > > HTML 4

Re: [css-d] What the "X" is going on?

2007-09-07 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Tigdh Glesain wrote: > http://www.webdevout.net/articles/beware-of-xhtml#what_is_xhtml Since the quality of the mark-up is crucial for CSS to work, I have no problems discussing the issue here on css-d. However: the issue is about technical conformance and practical use (serving) of XHTML, so opi

Re: [css-d] What the "X" is going on? [medium]

2007-09-07 Thread Geoffrey Sneddon
On 7 Sep 2007, at 16:44, Rafael wrote: > Hi, Ta! > > I'm not sure what you're talking about when you mention "the > forked-code wars", but chances are you're worrying unnecessarily. > > As far as I see, he's only trying to get people actually > understand > what XHTML is, and the di

Re: [css-d] What the "X" is going on?

2007-09-07 Thread Alan Gresley
Tigdh Glesain wrote: > Hallo Folks, > > I am just a little foncused. This may seem like an 'off-topic' > subject, but I think I'm correct in saying it effects the way in > which we code our CSS to a degree. If this topic has been covered > before, then I apologise and would ask for a pointer tow

Re: [css-d] What the "X" is going on? [medium]

2007-09-07 Thread Rafael
Hi, Ta! I'm not sure what you're talking about when you mention "the forked-code wars", but chances are you're worrying unnecessarily. As far as I see, he's only trying to get people actually understand what XHTML is, and the differences it has against HTML, though I have a somewha

[css-d] What the "X" is going on?

2007-09-06 Thread Tigdh Glesain
Hallo Folks, I am just a little foncused. This may seem like an 'off-topic' subject, but I think I'm correct in saying it effects the way in which we code our CSS to a degree. If this topic has been covered before, then I apologise and would ask for a pointer towards the resource. This