Re: [css-d] Width and border issues-simple, I think

2007-01-08 Thread Alex Robinson
At 14:29 + 8/1/07, Barney Carroll wrote: >Under the strictest rules, all negative number values for measurement >are illegal. Not true. "Negative values for margin properties are allowed, but there may be implementation-specific limits." http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/box.html#margin-proper

Re: [css-d] Width and border issues-simple, I think

2007-01-08 Thread Rimantas Liubertas
> Under the strictest rules, all negative number values for measurement > are illegal. False. > However, even the most ruthless standardistas make use of > them. Negative percentages in complex positioning occasionally causes > problems for IE, but no more than anything else! Most ruthless stand

Re: [css-d] Width and border issues-simple, I think

2007-01-08 Thread ~davidLaakso
Barney Carroll wrote: > Under the strictest rules, all negative number values for measurement > are illegal. However, even the most ruthless standardistas make use of > them. Negative percentages in complex positioning occasionally causes > problems for IE, but no more than anything else! > > Re

Re: [css-d] Width and border issues-simple, I think

2007-01-08 Thread Barney Carroll
Under the strictest rules, all negative number values for measurement are illegal. However, even the most ruthless standardistas make use of them. Negative percentages in complex positioning occasionally causes problems for IE, but no more than anything else! Regards, Barney Amy Ostrom wrote:

Re: [css-d] Width and border issues-simple, I think

2007-01-08 Thread Amy Ostrom
Dear Georg: Thank you! I was just able to test this out and it works nicely. I was a bit leery about the negative margins, but it's a quick fix for a beta version. Is it "illegal" to use negative numbers in margin or padding? Mucho gracias! -- In peace, Amy M Ostrom Web Interface Designer [

Re: [css-d] Width and border issues-simple, I think

2007-01-04 Thread Gunlaug Sørtun
Amy Ostrom wrote: > http://www.kcscienceinc.org/ > > 1. The images under the links shouldn't have the borders or > additional padding *sigh*. Simple, I know, but I can't find it. This > happens in both IE and Firefox I would've liked to use those W3C validators, but they can't get anything out

Re: [css-d] Width and border issues-simple, I think

2007-01-04 Thread Amy Ostrom
Dear All: Oh my goodness... well, the first problem I had was simply because I needed to increase specificity to overwrite the other rule, my bad. I am still uncertain about the second issue of why IE is pushing the contact information over. Anyone have any suggestions? Thank you so much!! --

[css-d] Width and border issues-simple, I think

2007-01-04 Thread Amy Ostrom
Dear collective mind of the CSS-D: I am being stupid and not seeing the obvious solution to two problems at http://www.kcscienceinc.org/ 1. The images under the links shouldn't have the borders or additional padding *sigh*. Simple, I know, but I can't find it. This happens in both IE and Firef