Re: [css-d] background pos x/y repeat-x/y

Michael Landis wrote: > Eric A. Meyer wrote: > >> There are no values such as 'repeat-down' or 'repeat-right', which >> is what I assume you're seeking. > > On 7/29/06, Robert O'Rourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Is there going to be a feature like this in future at all? I can see it >> being u

Re: [css-d] background pos x/y repeat-x/y

Eric A. Meyer wrote: > There are no values such as 'repeat-down' or 'repeat-right', which > is what I assume you're seeking. > > Is there going to be a feature like this in future at all? I can see it being useful, at least for the sake of completeness in the range of background properties av

Re: [css-d] background pos x/y repeat-x/y

> At 10:22 AM -0500 7/29/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>Anyone ever notice that if you repeat-x a background image you can only >>background position that image on the y coordinate and vice versa - so >>when you repeat-y you can position x but the y is useless (defaults to >> 0). > > There a

Re: [css-d] background pos x/y repeat-x/y

At 10:22 AM -0500 7/29/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Anyone ever notice that if you repeat-x a background image you can only >background position that image on the y coordinate and vice versa - so >when you repeat-y you can position x but the y is useless (defaults to 0). Actually, the backgr

Re: [css-d] background pos x/y repeat-x/y

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > yes it does seem to make sense however it would be nice to be able to do > and not add extra divs > > > Thats true, I think the CSS3 border-image properties might go someway towards sorting that kind of thing out. Damn all this waiting... ___

Re: [css-d] background pos x/y repeat-x/y

yes it does seem to make sense however it would be nice to be able to do and not add extra divs > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Anyone ever notice that if you repeat-x a background image you can only >> background position that image on the y coordinate and vice versa - so >> when you repeat-y you c

Re: [css-d] background pos x/y repeat-x/y

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Anyone ever notice that if you repeat-x a background image you can only > background position that image on the y coordinate and vice versa - so > when you repeat-y you can position x but the y is useless (defaults to 0). > ?? Isn't that kind of the point? Or did you wan

[css-d] background pos x/y repeat-x/y

Anyone ever notice that if you repeat-x a background image you can only background position that image on the y coordinate and vice versa - so when you repeat-y you can position x but the y is useless (defaults to 0). ?? __ css-dis