Re: [css-d] font-face syntax revisited

2011-03-03 Thread Ingo Chao
2011/3/3 Philippe Wittenbergh : > > On Feb 12, 2011, at 5:53 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > http://dev.l-c-n.com/_temp/font_eot_woff.html >>> >>> Looks identical in IE9RC, Safari 5.0.3 and Opera 11.01 - on Vista. >> >> Thanks for testing - that means we really can use a cleaner, leaner synt

Re: [css-d] font-face syntax revisited

2011-03-03 Thread G.Sørtun
On 03.03.2011 08:05, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: [...] (or the equivalent header in your htaccess file, which is my preferred method) Of course. :-) I can't imagine why anyone would want any browser to perform at less than its best for new projects, so "IE=edge" is an obligatory "fix" for

Re: [css-d] font-face syntax revisited

2011-03-02 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
On Feb 12, 2011, at 5:53 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: >>> http://dev.l-c-n.com/_temp/font_eot_woff.html >> >> Looks identical in IE9RC, Safari 5.0.3 and Opera 11.01 - on Vista. > > Thanks for testing - that means we really can use a cleaner, leaner syntax to > load fonts. That makes it a gr

Re: [css-d] font-face syntax revisited

2011-02-12 Thread Barney Carroll
Good article on the pertinent factors of the new syntax and EOT v WOFF for IE9 here: http://readableweb.com/new-font-face-syntax-simpler-easier Regards, Barney Carroll barney.carr...@gmail.com 07594 506 381 On 12 February 2011 08:53, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > > On Feb 12, 2011, at 4:42 P

Re: [css-d] font-face syntax revisited

2011-02-12 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
On Feb 12, 2011, at 4:42 PM, G.Sørtun wrote: >> http://dev.l-c-n.com/_temp/font_eot_woff.html > > Looks identical in IE9RC, Safari 5.0.3 and Opera 11.01 - on Vista. Thanks for testing - that means we really can use a cleaner, leaner syntax to load fonts. That makes it a great trick (and –bonus

Re: [css-d] font-face syntax revisited

2011-02-11 Thread G.Sørtun
On 12.02.2011 08:15, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: http://dev.l-c-n.com/_temp/font_eot_woff.html Looks identical in IE9RC, Safari 5.0.3 and Opera 11.01 - on Vista. regards Georg __ css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.o

[css-d] font-face syntax revisited

2011-02-11 Thread Philippe Wittenbergh
The developer behind the FontSquirel @font-face generator did come up with a new syntax for @font-face, one that is cleaner while avoiding the 404 errors that can happen due to bugs in IE < 9. http://www.fontspring.com/blog/the-new-bulletproof-font-face-syntax What Is not clear to me, atm, is i