An iPhone 4/5, for example, in portrait orientation is 320. Many other are
similar.
On Tuesday, May 26, 2015, Erik Visser e...@erikvisser.net wrote:
Tom Livingston schreef op 25-05-15 om 18:21:
Looks good.
On Monday, May 25, 2015, Erik Visser wrote:
Tom Livingston schreef op 25-05-15
Tom Livingston schreef op 25-05-15 om 18:21:
Looks good.
On Monday, May 25, 2015, Erik Visser wrote:
Tom Livingston schreef op 25-05-15 om 16:12:
Footer width is still not scaling. Even at 480.
footer is scaling too now
I think so too. From what i can see and test it is
Hi all,
Here is the site i am woring on to make it suitable for mobile/small
screens.
It should behave from big screen until 480px.
Below 480px additional work has to be done. Thats the next step.
http://beta.erikvisser.net
How does it behave at your (smaller) screens/browsers?
Any flaws?
May 25 2015 12:31 Erik Visser e...@erikvisser.net:
How does it behave at your (smaller) screens/browsers?
Wider displays makes Logomap to fall down, which may not be your focus right
now. If this isn’t replaced or something I’d place it with absolute
positioning. I guess it’s not supposed to
Footer width is still not scaling. Even at 480.
On Monday, May 25, 2015, Erik Visser e...@erikvisser.net wrote:
Hi all,
Here is the site i am woring on to make it suitable for mobile/small
screens.
It should behave from big screen until 480px.
Below 480px additional work has to be done.
I don't think that http://beta.erikvisser.net/images/header1.jpg should
scale anamorphically as the window changes width; it would be better
(IMHO) if the aspect ratio should remain constant and the viewport onto
it change.
Philip Taylor
MiB schreef op 25-05-15 om 15:36:
Wider displays makes Logomap to fall down, which may not be your focus right
now. If this isn’t replaced or something I’d place it with absolute
positioning. I guess it’s not supposed to move anywhere where it’s placed now?
It was intended but not very
Tom Livingston schreef op 25-05-15 om 16:12:
Footer width is still not scaling. Even at 480.
footer is scaling too now
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List
On Monday, May 25, 2015, Karl DeSaulniers k...@designdrumm.com wrote:
I don't think that http://beta.erikvisser.net/images/header1.jpg should
scale anamorphically as the window changes width; it would be better
(IMHO) if the aspect ratio should remain constant and the viewport onto
it
I don't think that http://beta.erikvisser.net/images/header1.jpg should scale
anamorphically as the window changes width; it would be better
(IMHO) if the aspect ratio should remain constant and the viewport onto
it change.
Philip Taylor
+1
Best,
Karl
Philip Taylor schreef op 25-05-15 om 19:14:
I don't think that http://beta.erikvisser.net/images/header1.jpg should
scale anamorphically as the window changes width; it would be better
(IMHO) if the aspect ratio should remain constant and the viewport onto
it change.
Ok, good point.
This is
Erik Visser schreef op 25-05-15 om 23:42:
Chrome 4.3.0.2
should be 43.0.2
__
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List
12 matches
Mail list logo
