Re: [css-d] matrix3D

2014-11-27 Thread Karl DeSaulniers
Google "matrix calculator". Best, Karl Sent from losPhone > On Nov 27, 2014, at 11:30 PM, Crest Christopher > wrote: > > That is what I thought. Do you know how to read and write a CSS matrix ? > Otherwise I'll write the longer method out, until I know how to write > matrices :-) > > Chri

Re: [css-d] matrix3D

2014-11-27 Thread Crest Christopher
That is what I thought. Do you know how to read and write a CSS matrix ? Otherwise I'll write the longer method out, until I know how to write matrices :-) Christopher Barney Carroll Thursday, November 27, 2014 4:10 AM It's exactly the same: it's all compute

Re: [css-d] matrix3D

2014-11-27 Thread Barney Carroll
It's exactly the same: it's all computed to a matrix anyway. Even in your pseudo-code example, translateN( value ) is obviously terser than expressing the 16 values necessary to define a 3d matrix. The ultimate decision to include both APIs is down to convenience and expressiveness rather than byte

[css-d] matrix3D

2014-11-26 Thread Crest Christopher
Is a CSS 3D-Matrix Transform equal to defining X,Y,Z translation values ? I think it would be simpler to do CSS 3D transforms using; matrix3d(n,n,n,n,n,n,n,n,n,n,n,n,n,n,n,n) instead of translate(x),(y),(z) less code :-) Christopher ___