Re: [css-d] rollover discrepency

2008-08-22 Thread Bill Brown
Daniel Kessler wrote: > Okay, so the basic idea as I see it is to work with the anchors instead > of the li. I saw the li as the more base part and worked from big to > small, but here small was the essential part (the link). > Now that "side li" and "side li:hover" are gutted, do I still need > t

Re: [css-d] rollover discrepency

2008-08-22 Thread Daniel Kessler
ah, I love explanations. I'm not great on memory unless I understand something. Never would've been a good actor. Okay, so the basic idea as I see it is to work with the anchors instead of the li. I saw the li as the more base part and worked from big to small, but here small was the esse

Re: [css-d] rollover discrepency

2008-08-22 Thread Bobby Jack
--- On Fri, 8/22/08, Daniel Kessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://sph.umd.edu/events/wellness2/template.html > > The navigation menu has padding between the s. > Because of this, > when I rollover the , it doesn't highlight > the text (black) for a > few pixel from each side. > Any sug

Re: [css-d] rollover discrepency

2008-08-22 Thread Bill Brown
Daniel Kessler wrote: > http://sph.umd.edu/events/wellness2/template.html > The navigation menu has padding between the s. Because of this, > when I rollover the , it doesn't highlight the text (black) for a > few pixel from each side. > Any suggestions for making this work consistently? I've

[css-d] rollover discrepency

2008-08-22 Thread Daniel Kessler
http//sph.umd.edu/events/wellness2/template.html The navigation menu has padding between the s. Because of this, when I rollover the , it doesn't highlight the text (black) for a few pixel from each side. Any suggestions for making this work consistently? I've checked Firefox Mac and Safar