On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Paceaux wrote:
> thank you, Philippe. That answers my question.
>
> I was "hoping" that the combinator could go upward in the document tree, but
> my experiments with that weren't working. It was an off-the-wall bet that
> I could change styles based on whethe
thank you, Philippe. That answers my question.
I was "hoping" that the combinator could go upward in the document tree, but my
experiments with that weren't working.It was an off-the-wall bet that I
could change styles based on whether another element were present in a
neighboring document
On Nov 15, 2011, at 5:09 AM, Paceaux wrote:
> 1. Does the non-adjacent sibling combinator ( ~ )only go in one directIon?
> If I attempt .address ~ .newsletter, I can successfully style
> newsletter.
> I I try .newsletter ~ .address, I cannot style newsletter
This combinator only
On 11/14/11 3:09 PM, Paceaux wrote:
I have an an element called "address" which needs a zero margin if the ul
"nav_social" is present.
If "nav_social" is not present, then "address" needs a 14px margin.
Frank M Taylor
Point the list to the problem page [s
I have a unique challenge with a client.
I have an an element called "address" which needs a zero margin if the ul
"nav_social" is present.
If "nav_social" is not present, then "address" needs a 14px margin.
My challenge is that "nav_social" is not a sibling of the same element as
"address". Th
