> That's 'font-weight: bold;', isn't it? Right. I'm tired, sorry. :-)
> - Manipulating letter/word spacing between states may seem to work, but > will become extremely complex and quite unpredictable across browser-land. That one wouldnt work. With the Arial Font I have on my Firefox Win XP the letters C, D, E, F, G, H, N, R and U get narrower when bold, B, I, K, L, O, P, Q, S, T, Y, Z, a, b, d, e, g, h, i, j, l, m, n, o, p, q, s and u stay the the same and A, J, M, V, W, X, c, f, k, r, t, v, w, x, y, z get wider - and thats only true for 12px text. See, I'm *really* tired :-) or white-space: nowrap; or overflow: hidden; is no option, since the text is supposed to break over as many lines as it wishes to. Hm - even the text has more freedom than me. I was fantasizing about some very intelligetn div in div solution that "knows" how much space the biggest version (bold or normal text) would take or something... > Say "thank you very much" to the one responsible for the design... I've already said that a few times - not quite as polite as you - to myself... Thanks to all... ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
