Georg (and thanks to Susan Welter for suggestions and Mac testing)

Thanks for the feedback.

> Just so that you know; poor old IE6 is forced to run in quirks mode,
> similar to IE5+ (see link below). That's fine with me, as I always do
> that on purpose anyway :-)
>
I've heard the phrase before but thought it was a user browser option - Doh!

Why do you always run in quirks mode?  Considering the whole issue of
standards based design should we not be writing to current standards (i.e.
standards mode) and then hacking where needed to meet bad browsers that we
HAVE to support; as opposed to writing for bad browsers then hacking for
standards compliance?

By taking out the xml declaration it seems to work (almost, results are
below), would this still work OK in older browsers though?

This raises another question, assuming you are designing a new website (now
in 2005/2006) for a B2B environment where expected visitors are mainly other
businesses (potentially all industries),  what kind of browser support
should be considered in the design?  I imagine most to be running Windows/IE
(unfortunately), with quite a few on UNIX, and some Linux and Mac.  Being a
new site (and possibly a new business) there are no visitor stats so where
do you begin, are there any current (at any given time) guidelines or
recommendations anywhere?

> To make the page working across browser-land, change styles to:
<CUT>

I tried your suggestions with the following results:

Quirks mode + suggestions = good all round but no bottom margin in IE.
Standard mode + suggestions = (same result as above)
Standard mode only (with existing code) = better results than the original,
however the background on #menu1 and #menu1 and the bottom #filler do not
show until a mouseover on one of the vnav elements.

Any suggestions?

Thanks again.

Mark.



______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to