Yeah, I've used floats to do this, but the problem I ran into is dt's
without an accompanying dd. This makes the next dd move up into the
space left for that missing dd, which means you have a term aligned
with
an incorrect definition. I think the way I worked around it was just
to
give ever
On 8/12/05, Zoe M. Gillenwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pringle, Ron wrote:
>
> >>Is there a way to get a dt and a dd next to each other?
> >>
> >>
> >Have a look at the Wiki[1], it discusses this. I also seem to remember Zoe
> >Gillenwater doing some experimenting with this very same idea, bu
Pringle, Ron wrote:
Is there a way to get a dt and a dd next to each other?
Have a look at the Wiki[1], it discusses this. I also seem to remember Zoe
Gillenwater doing some experimenting with this very same idea, but do not
recall if she posted a sample page anywhere. You could try googli
> From: Christy Collins
>
> Is there a way to get a dt and a dd next to each other?
Christy,
dt{float: left;}
in your stylesheet should do it for you.
--
Peter Williams
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-di
On 8/11/05, Christy Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to get a dt and a dd next to each other? If I set both
> to inline, I then don't get a line break after the dd. Is there a way
> to do this without adding a break tag in my markup?
>
If your dt's are all fairly short, then t
> Is there a way to get a dt and a dd next to each other? If I
> set both
> to inline, I then don't get a line break after the dd. Is
> there a way
> to do this without adding a break tag in my markup?
>
> Thanks,
> Christy
Christy-
Have a look at the Wiki[1], it discusses this. I also se
