-Caveat Lector-

http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?id=149495&article=24160

warren pease
Grassy Knoll Society: From Camelot to Crawford
Sat Apr 20 15:39:25 2002
68.3.136.226

Grassy Knoll Society: From Camelot to Crawford
April 18, 2002
By warren pease

Which is easier to believe: That the laws of physics which have governed
objects in motion since the big bang were suspended for a few seconds on a
single afternoon in Dallas 39 years ago to allow a single, mediocre marksman
to kill a president? Or that there was another rifleman?

Last week Georgia Rep. Cynthia McKinney (D - Courage) broke the code. In a
radio interview, she asked the forbidden question concerning Sept. 11: Why is
the Bush administration stonewalling, and why has it asked Senate
investigators to back off? In short, is Bush Inc. trying to hide something?
If so, what did they know and when did they know it?

In a statement intended to clarify her statements and call off the dogs,
McKinney said, "We hold thorough public inquiries into rail disasters, plane
crashes and even natural disasters. Why then does the administration remain
steadfast in its opposition to an investigation into the biggest terrorism
attack in history?"

She added that international news organizations have been reporting for
months of indications that the Bush administration had received warnings
about the attacks and failed to act on them.  Naturally, she's being savaged
by the right, the center and the left. Paul Begala, the latest
Democratic white knight to turn yellow from the toxic after-effects of
radical spine-ectomy, even did a ritual dive under the table on Crossfire to
symbolically distance himself from McKinney's comments. It was a gesture so
perfect as a metaphor for media harlotry that it was impossible to
see it without assuming that Paul gave co-host and right-wing fop Tucker
Carlson's thigh a couple of quick squeezes and whispered salacious promises
involving champagne and chains and mirrors in a posh hotel later that
evening.

The grassy knoll

Ari Fleischer, presidential spokesdork and owner of the second best smirk in
the western world, dismissed McKinney and those who share her point of view
as members of "the grassy knoll society." This refers to an area flanking Elm
Street in Dallas from which an alleged second shooter
opened fire on John F. Kennedy in 1963. Although many witnesses to the
assassination say they heard shots coming from the grassy knoll -- even some
Dallas cops charged in that direction looking for the shooter -- the official
story pins the blame on a single rifleman firing from a sixth floor window of
the old Texas Schoolbook Depository. Ironically, the building now serves as a
museum dedicated to advancing the official story.

But here's the thing. Playing the "conspiracy nut" card is a time-honored way
to discredit the unofficial points of view. Unfortunately, there are any
number of nuts who do, in fact, give serious conspiracy investigators a bad
name. There are also a lot of very sane profiteers, such as Art Bell,
who are making a ton of money peddling conspiracy theories. But just because
these nuts and shysters exist doesn't mean there are no conspiracies.

While most conspiracy theories -- notably those involving Area 51, Roswell,
or alien abduction -- are viewed by officialdom as merely bread and circuses
for today's gullible junk science consumers, those that challenge important
official truths are dealt with harshly.

One of those official truths is that conspiracies only happen in far-away
places and that, in America, politics is characterized by reasonable actions
taken by reasonable men elected to office by reasonable voters. There are no
conspiracies to remove elected officials in America, and
therefore any political assassinations must be planned and carried out by
single, mentally unbalanced individual with a grudge and a fixation --
usually called the "one lone nut" theory.

Famous lone nuts include a bunch of guys with three names and another with
one name squared: Lee Harvey Oswald, James Earl Ray, John Wilkes Booth,
Sirhan Sirhan.

The single-bullet theory

It 1963, it was deemed necessary to preserve the fiction that, in America,
conspiracies don't kill politicians, lone nuts do. And when the facts in the
Kennedy case failed to support this essential construct, a new theory was
invented to fit the facts.

So Arlen Specter, then a young lawyer working for the Warren Commission and
now a US Senator from Pennsylvania, devised a scenario so ridiculous that it
required complete suspension of the laws of physics, along with even the
barest modicum of logic and skepticism.

To fit the official story, Oswald had to have acted alone. But a man named
Abraham Zapruder had filmed the assassination with his home movie camera and,
in the process, established a precise time frame for the sequence of events.
Investigators proved it was physically impossible to get off more than three
shots with the alleged assassination weapon -- a cheap, mail-order
bolt-action rifle. The first shot missed and the third blew Kennedy's head
apart.

Therefore, to account for multiple wounds to the president and Texas Governor
John Connolly, seated just in front of Kennedy, the second shot must have
passed through Kennedy, hung motionless in the air for a bit, zigged and
zagged, entered Connolly's shoulder, bounced around his rib cage, exited,
zigged again, and lodged in his wrist, shattering bone and cartilage. And
after this miraculous journey, it finally showed up on a stretcher at
Parkland Hospital in nearly pristine condition. The "single bullet" in
Specter's single bullet theory. Needless to say, scores of proficient
marksmen have never been able to replicate this feat. Not even close.

But that's not considered crazy; it's the official story signed by all
members of the Warren Commission and passed into the US historical record,
irreproducible results notwithstanding.

Not coincidentally, this same country relies on the trappings of legality to
explain the events of December 2000, which in any country not called America
would have been described by an American administration and press as an
obvious and shameful overthrow of the democratic process, and would be
officially "deplored."

And so when Cynthia McKinney attempts to force this very same fraudulent
administration to apply the same level of official scrutiny that would attend
any high-profile kidnapping, a missing child or yet another in the endless
series of multiple murder-suicides that plague a country wracked
by economic depression and infested with advanced weaponry -- when McKinney
attempts to force an official inquiry into the events of Sept. 11 that may
ask uncomfortable questions of high-ranking officials in various intelligence
agencies and administration positions, Ari Fleischer has
the epic effrontery to, in essence, accuse her of being a couple of cans
short of a case.

This administration is nearly a million votes short of legitimacy and its
chief apologist has the unmitigated gall to suggest that anyone who questions
its official pronouncements a conspiracy nut.

Never mind that the only entity that seems to have benefited from 9-11 is the
Bush administration itself, which was in its customary disarray and tanking
quickly in the polls by late August 2001.  Now, capitalizing on an
unprecedented wave of hyper-patriotism fueled by the ceaseless
cheerleading of irrepressible bliss ninnies in mainstream media, Bush has
shamelessly used the corpses of about 3,000 American civilians as
springboards to advance his political agenda.

So is he the luckiest bastard ever to tread the American political stage, or
did he make his own luck? Who knows? And without the kind of thorough
investigation McKinney is calling for, those questions can never be answered
and the events surrounding Sept. 11 will simply pass into
American folk lore along with the grassy knoll.

Which is easier to believe: That the world's mightiest military power, along
with an unparalleled national security and intelligence apparatus, failed to
predict, interdict or even put up a decent fight against the most deadly
attack in this country's modern history? Or that people in high places put
out the word to stand down and let it happen?


The author would much rather there were no need for a Grassy Knoll Society,
and that we lived in a country in which government had earned our trust.
Sadly, this is George W. Bush's America. Email comments to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to