-Caveat Lector-

------- Forwarded Message Follows -------
Date sent:              Tue, 14 Sep 1999 09:49:07 -0500
To:                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From:                   "John C. Goodman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:                NCPA Policy Digest 9-14-99

National Center for Policy Analysis
DAILY POLICY DIGEST
Tuesday, September 14, 1999

PointCast can automatically load NCPA's Policy Digest summaries
on your desktop for easy reading.  For information go to
http://www.ncpa.org/pointcast.html

IN TODAY'S DIGEST

   o   THE FAILURE OF A CUSTOMS SERVICE COMPUTER COULD DELAY
       IMPORTS by eight days, warn analysts, and cost the U.S.
       billions of dollars....INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY

   o   EUROPE'S BAN ON BIOTECH FOOD is bad news for U.S.
       farmers....INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY

   o   FEDERAL REGULATORS WANT MORE AIRLINE COMPETITION, and are
       using antitrust actions and airport oversight to
       "encourage" it....WALL STREET JOURNAL

   o   CAMPAIGN SPENDING ROSE ONLY 80 PERCENT AS FAST AS FEDERAL
       OUTLAYS from 1982 to 1996, but a finance reform bill would
       limit candidates, says Jim Miller....HOOVER INSTITUTION

   o   A PAID PARENTAL LEAVE ENTITLEMENT COULD COST $14 BILLION
       TO $128 BILLION and undermine Unemployment Insurance
       funding....EMPLOYMENT POLICY FOUNDATION

   o   MORE THAN 500 SCHOOL DISTRICTS ARE SUPERVISED BY COURTS,
       but that may change with the end of court-ordered busing
       in Charlotte, N.C....USA TODAY

   o   A NEW MISSOURI LAW TARGETS IMPAIRED DRIVERS regardless of
       age, although very young and old drivers have high
       accident rates....NATIONAL USA TODAY

IN TODAY'S NEWS

TALE OF A TROUBLED COMPUTER

Analysts report that the well-being of a major sector of the U.S.
economy hinges on an aging and overworked computer located in
Newington, Va., a quiet Washington, D.C., suburb.  The computer's
assigned task is to count imports coming into the U.S.  But the
system is 15 years old and with imports soaring it stands near
collapse, experts warn.

If the computer breaks down for more than a few hours, goods from
abroad will start stacking up at the U.S. border.  U.S. companies
that rely on just-in-time deliveries might have to shut down
production.  Economists say the ripple effect could cost the U.S.
billions of dollars.

   o   When the computer -- known as ACS for Automated Commercial
       System -- was first brought on line, U.S. imports stood at
       $332 billion annually, but are close to $1 trillion now.

   o   The first sign of trouble came in September 1998, causing
       a six hour shut down that threw the U.S. Customs Service
       three weeks behind schedule.

   o   After a second glitch a little more than two weeks later,
       the computer muddled along for a two-day period.

   o   A new system would cost around $1.5 billion -- but the
       White House, Customs and Congress have reportedly dragged
       their feet on spending the money.

Several months ago, Customs ran a simulated computer shutdown
test in the ports of Charleston, S.C., and Savannah, Ga.  Instead
of using the computer, officials counted using pens and paper.
The result was that backlogs exploded after just six hours.

After a theoretical 30-day shut down, cargoes would have been
delayed by as long as eight days in port.  Manufacturers would
have been deprived of vitally important parts and agriculture
imports would have rotted.

Source: Daniel J. Murphy, "A Computer-Age Trade Meltdown?"
Investor's Business Daily, September 14, 1999.

For more on Commerce Dept.
http://www.ncpa.org/pd/budget/budget-7.html

EUROPE'S BAN ON GENETICALLY ALTERED FOOD HURTING U.S. FARMERS

European trade officials are flinging up barriers to genetically
modified foods -- which U.S. farmers grow in abundance.  Analysts
are stunned by the vehemence of Europe's rejection of the foods.

"To find the Europeans so phobic is alarming, disturbing,
confusing," says Jeffrey Gedmin, executive director of the New
Atlantic Initiative.  "There's just something so irrational, so
emotional going on," he adds.

Hormone-treated beef is already banned in Europe and corn and
soybeans are under the gun.  This is bad news to U.S. farmers who
depend upon that market.

   o   Thirty-five percent of the 9.4 billion bushel U.S. corn
       crop is genetically modified -- which U.S. experts claim
       poses no health risk, but results in better and cheaper
       crops.

   o   Some 55 percent of the nearly 2.8 billion bushel U.S.
       soybean crop is also genetically modified.

   o   Europe's ban on genetically modified foods could result in
       lost markets for as much as a billion bushels of grain.

   o   Observers say that while there is an element of resentment
       and envy of the U.S. in these trade policies, Europeans
       are just as critical of genetic modification research in
       their own countries.

U.S. trade advocates make the point that European consumers don't
have to buy genetically altered food imports.  But at least trade
officials should let them have the choice.

Genetically modified foods aside, analysts bemoan the sorry state
of trade relations in general -- which have been allowed to
deteriorate on both sides of the Atlantic.

Source: Jim Christie, "Dumping on Trade," Investor's Business
Daily, September 14, 1999.

For more on Tariffs and Other Trade Barriers
http://www.ncpa.org/pd/trade/trade8.html

MORE COMPETITION -- OR REGULATION -- AT AIRPORTS?

In May the Justice Department filed an antitrust suit against
American Airlines, alleging the carrier illegally drove small
competitors out of its hub airport, Dallas-Fort Worth
International Airport.  A "hub" is an airport where a carrier
bases many of its operations, including originating, and
transferring passengers between, flights.  As part of this crack
down on practices federal regulators say allow big airlines to
dominate their major hubs, the Transportation Department is
preparing a report which calls on airports to foster greater
competition.

While the recommendations have not been finalized and could
change, here are some highlights:

   o   Airports can encourage competitive access by closely
       monitoring how gates are used and ensuring that carriers
       are using gates under their control -- rather than simply
       locking others out of them.

   o   Airports could also convert exclusive-use gates to common
       use when possible, and expand terminals to create new
       openings for airlines.

   o   The Federal Aviation Administration -- which oversees
       federal airport funding, as well as how airports levy
       passenger fees that go toward construction -- would be
       called upon to make competitive issues a central part of
       their review process on such projects.

   o   The task force found that airports are legally obligated
       to provide access to competitive airlines, including
       "every reasonable effort to accommodate new entrants."

Major carriers have fought the initiative, arguing the
department's proposal would approach reregulation and hinder
competition.  Many of the hub airports are built up with major
investments from the carriers themselves.

Small carriers have complained of being frozen out of major hubs
by high fees, as well as problems getting convenient gates.

Source: Anna Wilde Mathews, "Crackdown on Airline Hubs to Be
Sought," Wall Street Journal, September 14, 1999.

For more on Antitrust
http://www.ncpa.org/pd/law/buslaw/index1a.html

For more on Current Air Travel Regulations
http://www.ncpa.org/pd/regulat/reg-1.html

IN OTHER NEWS

COMPETITION IS THE KEY TO CAMPAIGN REFORM

"Leveling the playing field" or achieving "fairness" are the
wrong goals for campaign finance reform, says former Reagan
cabinet officer James C. Miller III.  The goal of reform should
be to increase the competitiveness of the political market, which
incumbents tend to monopolize.

Excessive campaign spending is not the problem.  For instance,
federal campaign spending during 1995-96 was approximately $2.2
billion -- compared with commercial advertising expenditures of
$175 billion and federal outlays of $1.56 trillion in 1996.

Nor has campaign spending risen dramatically.

   o   Comparing the 1982 and 1996 election cycles, spending per
       candidate grew only 80 percent as fast as federal outlays.

   o   And contributions by Political Action Committees (PACs)
       grew only 10 percent faster than gross domestic product.

The majority of campaign funds come from individual contributors
-- despite the fact that the $1,000 limit on personal
contributions set in 1974 is now worth only $307 due to
inflation.  By contrast, PACs provide a little more than one-third
of contributions to House races and only one-fifth of Senate
campaign contributions.

Unfortunately, the main congressional reform bill -- McCain-
Feingold in the Senate and Shays-Meehan in the House -- proposes
a $600,000 spending limit for U.S. House races.

   o   In 1996 every incumbent who spent less than $500,000 won
       versus only 3 percent of challengers who spent that
       little.

   o   Challengers who spent between $500,000 and $1 million won
       40 percent of the time, and of those challengers who spent
       more than $1 million, five of six won.

   o   With respect the proposal's limit for Senate races of $1.5
       million to $8.25 million -- depending on state size -- in
       1994 and 1996 every challenger whose spending kept within
       those limits lost and every incumbent won.

Thus limiting campaign spending would have the perverse effect of
giving incumbents even greater advantages over challengers.

Source: James C. Miller III (Hoover Institution), Monopoly
Politics (Stanford, Calif.: Hoover Institution Press, 1999).

For more on Miller's appearance at Dallas luncheon
http://www.ncpa.org/events/miller.html

For more on Spending Limits
http://www.ncpa.org/pd/govern/govern2.html

TAPPING UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE TRUST FUND TO PAY FAMILY LEAVE

Six years after the passage of the Family and Medical Leave Act
(FMLA) established unpaid leave for parents of newborn or newly-
adopted children, the Clinton administration has launched a
national campaign to fund paid parental leaves through the
Unemployment Insurance (UI) system.

The UI system is a joint federal-state program -- funded by
employers' federal and state payroll taxes -- to alleviate
financial hardship for the unemployed by providing partial wage
replacement.

But analysts at the Employment Policy Foundation warn that severe
recessions can quickly deplete the fund.  For instance, the
1980-82 recession forced 33 states to borrow over $20 billion
from the federal government, and the federal account went
bankrupt in 1977 -- resulting in a .2 percent surcharge to the
federal unemployment tax which is still in effect today.

Furthermore, the Department of Labor predicted just last year
that a recession similar in magnitude to the one of the early
1980s would force 25 to 30 states to borrow $20-25 billion.

   o   EPF estimates that Clinton's proposal could cost the UI
       system, at a minimum, an additional $14.4 billion annually
       -- assuming some six million parents would be eligible for
       the paid leave.

   o   If paid leave is extended for 26 weeks, EPF estimates that
       the cost to the UI system could rise to $31.2 billion (see
       figure http://www.ncpa.org/pd/gif/eb990910.gif ).

   o   If it gives all FMLA leave takers and those with leave
       needs access to UI payments, EPF estimates this could
       increase the eligible population to 24.6 million
       individuals, and could cost $59 billion annually to fund
       leaves of 12 weeks.

   o   Covering leaves of 26 weeks inflates the potential cost to
       a whopping $127.7 billion annually.

Thus, adding the new entitlement to the UI system jeopardizes its
ability to pay benefits to the unemployed in the next recession.

Source: "Paid Parental Leave: A $14 Billion to $128 Billion
Entitlement," Economic Bytes, September 10, 1999, Employment
Policy Foundation, 1015 15th Street, N.W., Suite 1200,
Washington, D.C. 20005 , (202) 789-8685.

For text http://www.epf.org/ebyte/eb990910.htm

For more on Family Leave
http://www.ncpa.org/pd/economy/pdeco/pdhavoc.html

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF CHARLOTTE BUSING DECISION

On Friday, a federal judge ordered an end to forced busing of
students to achieve racial integration in the Charlotte, N.C.,
public school system -- setting the stage for changes throughout
the nation, observers say.

"This is a milestone that foreshadows the end of forced busing,"
commented Clint Bolick of the Institute for Justice.  He added
that "this shows that social engineering is not the way to
achieve desegregation."

   o   Legal experts predict that parents will go to court in
       other jurisdictions which are under court supervision and
       seek an end to force busing.

   o   More than 500 of the nation's 16,000 school systems remain
       under court supervision.

   o   Beyond the issue of busing, the decision has implications
       for other tactics used to desegregate schools --
       particularly the 4,200 magnet schools serving 1.5 million
       students nationwide, supported by $98 million in annual
       Department of Education grants.

   o   The Legal Defense Fund of the National Association for the
       Advancement of Colored People says it will appeal the
       decision, but the Charlotte school district has not
       decided what course it will take.

Parents of students both black and white have become increasingly
critical of heavy-handed, race-based policies they say are
interfering with their children's education.

Source: Dennis Cauchon, "Busing Ruling Will Affect Schools Across
the USA," USA Today, September 13, 1999.

For more on Federal Courts & Busing
http://www.ncpa.org/pi/edu/edu11.html#d

MISSOURI'S IMPAIRED-DRIVER LAW

Other states will be watching the effects of a new law in
Missouri designed to keep impaired persons out of the driver's
seat.  Rather than targeting older people and setting an age
beyond which a person cannot drive, it attempts to weed out
drivers whose failed skills make them candidates for accidents.

   o   The eight-month-old law has already yielded 689 reports
       about impaired Missouri drivers -- some of whom lost their
       licenses, while others were issued restrictions.

   o   The law allows those closest to a possibly unfit driver to
       report the person's condition confidentially.

   o   The driver must take a new driving test -- and failing the
       test means that the person's license is revoked.

   o   Drivers 75 or older are more than twice as likely to be
       involved in a fatal crash than drivers age 65 to 74,
       according to the National Highway Safety Traffic Safety
       Administration -- and, except for drivers age 19 or
       younger, have the highest driver fatality rates of any age
       group (see figure http://www.ncpa.org/pd/gif/pd091499a.gif ).

Supporters say that prior to the new law going into effect,
family members who were worried that an older member was a menace
on the road could only plead with him or her not to drive or take
away the car keys -- which often led to a shattering of family
relations.

Source: Andrea Tortora, "Missouri Makes Ability, Not Age, the
Driving Concern," USA Today, September 13, 1999.

For more on Drivers http://www.ncpa.org/pd/regulat/reg-2.html

**********************************************************************
                  NATIONAL CENTER FOR POLICY ANALYSIS
                            DALLAS, TEXAS

                    "Making Ideas Change the World"

                           Internet Address:
                          http://www.ncpa.org
**********************************************************************


A<>E<>R
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said
it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your
own reason and your common sense." --Buddha
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
                                       German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to