-Caveat Lector-

an excerpt from:
The Arizona Project
Michael Wendland©1977
ISBN 0-8362-0728-9
Sheed Andrews and McMeel, Inc.
6700 Squibb Rd.
Misson Kansas 66202
276 pps. - first edition - out-of-print
New revised edition - available amazon.com
Paperback, 304pp.
ISBN: 0945165021
Blue Sky Press, Incorporated
June 1988
--[14]--
14
A Twenty-Year Deal

Saturday, January 15, began as a fairly quiet morning in the IRE suite. The
reporters had begun work promptly at eight-thirty. A fairly standard routine
had developed. After breakfast and before starting the staff meeting, someone
would read aloud "Today's Chuckle," a normally humorless and stale one-liner
that appeared every day on the front page of the morning Republic with
"Today's Prayer." The chuckles never came, but the IRE reporters kept reading
them anyway, mostly out of amazement that a modem metropolitan newspaper
would continue to waste space in such a trite fashion. Then, just before
getting down to work, the daily low temperature from Chicago, Detroit, New
York, and Indianapolis during one of the century's coldest winters would be
read off the weather page. All winter in Phoenix the weather had been
monotonously but beautifully the same: cloudless skies and temperatures in
the low seventies. It was one of the few fringe benefits of being away from
home so long.

One recent news story, however, had been of major interest to the reporters.
The John Adamson murder trial had started in Tucson a few weeks before. Jury
selection was still going on. Several dozen prospective jurors had been
quizzed, but, because of extensive knowledge about the case, most had been
rejected. That morning's Republic reported that Superior Court Judge Ben
Birdsall had scheduled a rare Saturday session to speed up the process.

Shortly before noon, as IRE reporters were reading their files and working on
the final stages of their various investigations, the telephone rang. It was
Chuck Kelly, the Republic staffer who had been covering the trial and a
friend of most of the IRE reporters.

"Adamson's confessed," he told Bob Greene. "He's admitted the whole thing.
And he's named everyone else he was involved with."

The first indication that there was a break in the case had come about nine
that morning when the jury selection process was to be resumed. But instead
of getting down to the long, tedious questioning, Judge Birdsall had
apologized to the jury panel, noting that there would be a delay.

At 11:00 A.M., Adamson, dressed in the same prescription sunglasses, print
sport shirt, brown trousers, and white shoes he had worn each day for the
past three weeks, entered the courtroom with sheriff's deputies and his
attorney. He appeared neither overly serious nor nonchalant.

Judge Birdsall came in a moment later and, in an emotionless monotone,
announced to a hushed courtroom that a plea arrangement had been made between
Adamson and the prosecution, that Adamson, originally charged with
first-degree murder, wished to change his previous plea of not guilty, to
guilty of a reduced charge of murder in the second degree.

"Is this a voluntary plea?" asked Birdsall.

"It is, Your Honor," said Adamson.

"Now, I want you to tell this court just what you did in connection with the
death of Don Bolles."

Adamson's voice was firm. "On June 2, 1976, in the parking lot of the
Clarendon Hotel, I placed a bomb containing dynamite under the car of Don
Bolles to be detonated at a later time for the express purpose of killing
him."

"Did you bring the bomb yourself to the automobile?"

"I did."

"And, as I understand it, you placed it under the car?" continued the judge,
studying a number of typewritten documents in front of him.

"That's correct, Your Honor."

"Did you do anything with reference to getting Mr. Bolles to the Clarendon
Hotel on that date?"

"I did, sir."

"And what, if anything, did you have to do with reference to instructing
anyone concerning the discharge of the bomb?"

"I made a phone call to an individual and told him where Mr. Bolles would be
at a specific time and to, where, where it was to be arranged that the bomb
was to be detonated," said Adamson.

"You said this to me, but I want to make sure that I understand you
correctly," the judge continued, carefully choosing his words. "You procured
the bomb. You took it to the car. You put it under the car. And you made
arrangements to have it detonated, all with the specific intent to kill Mr.
Bolles. Is that right?"

"Yes, sir."

Birdsall then went over all eighteen terms of the proposed plea agreement
submitted for his approval. Basically, it guaranteed that Adamson would be
freed from prison after serving twenty years. His sentence would be served in
an out-of-state jail and would not be handed down officially until he
testified fully and completely against all others who were involved in the
murder. If Adamson should lie, or appeal his sentence, or try to be paroled
from jail before the twenty years were up, the agreement would be null and
void, and he could then be retried on a first-degree murder charge or
resentenced to an even longer prison term.

For forty minutes, Birdsall questioned Adamson, making certain that the
agreement was voluntary and that the defendant fully understood the
ramifications. But instead of approving it, the judge explained that he
needed more information about Adamson himself. He scheduled a hearing for the
following Wednesday, by which time he expected that the county probation
department would have prepared a background report. To make sure, he ordered
the report on his desk by Tuesday afternoon.

Adamson was led off to jail and the jury was excused. There was no mention
made of Adamson's coconspirators in the court proceeding. However, by
midmorning, developments in Phoenix 180 miles to the north answered all of
the reporters' questions. An affidavit given police by Adamson was officially
filed in Maricopa County Superior Court to support the arrests of two other
men-Max Dunlap and James Robison.

It was Dunlap, said Adamson in the signed affidavit, who hired him to kill
Bolles. And it was Robison, a short, fat plumber and longtime Adamson pal,
who, he said, assisted him in blowing up the reporter's car. Adamson's sworn
statement said that Dunlap told him that millionaire rancher Kemper Marley
wanted Bolles dead because the reporter had given Marley "a bad time" when
Marley was appointed to the Arizona Racing Commission the previous spring.
The aging Marley had to resign the job because of a controversy created by
news stories which detailed his questionable performances in past state
political posts, stories which were written by Don Bolles. But Bolles was not
the only man Adamson said he was asked to kill. There were three others. Two
of them were relatively minor figures.

Al "King Alfonso" Lizanetz, a former Marley public relations man who adopted
the colorful nickname after claiming to have had a vision from God, had been
sending out wild, rambling letters to reporters and politicians detailing
alleged wrongdoings by his former employer. Lizanetz's name came as no
surprise. Police had been tipped months before that Adamson was also going
after "The King." "He's been writing a lot of bullshit about Marley," Adamson
was known to have said to his drinking cronies shortly after the Bolles
bombing.

Another man on Dunlap's death list was Doug Damon, who had supposedly conned
Marley out of $15,000 in a deal involving the purchase of stolen silver.
Adamson said he never carried out the contract because Damon had skipped town
with Marley's money.

However, the fourth man Adamson was asked to kill, according to the
affidavit, was very much a part of the current Phoenix scene. Adamson said
Dunlap wanted him to murder state Attorney General Bruce Babbitt. The reason:
"He [Dunlap] said the attorney general was investigating the liquor industry
and if he could not be persuaded politically to halt it, then Kemper Marley
wanted to get him killed."

Kemper Marley's wealth stemmed from many areas. Land, cattle, oil, and water
helped to make him a millionaire. But his main business was liquor. And his
wholesale liquor, beer, and wine company, United Liquor Company, was a
virtual monopoly in Arizona.

It was also a part of an antitrust suit filed by Babbitt in 1975 that accused
the Arizona Licensed Beverage Association of price fixing. Babbitt had named
Marley's firm as a coconspirator. The case was still pending at the time
Adamson said he was asked to kill Babbitt, and the attorney general showed no
signs of abandoning it.

Kemper Marley was so big that he allegedly ordered murder contracts in
package deals. The total price for the killings negotiated through Dunlap was
$50,000, Adamson said.

By early afternoon, less than two hours after Adamson had admitted his role
in the Bolles killing and promised to testify against the others who were
involved in the plot, Dunlap and Robison were in the Maricopa County jail,
held without bail on charges of first-degree murder. Police refused to
comment on whether Marley was also an official suspect. "The investigation is
continuing," said Bruce Babbitt.

At the IRE office, the news of Adamson's sudden confession soon became the
only activity of the half-dozen newsmen. The various IRE investigations were
temporarily shelved as the reporters frantically pounded out Sunday stories
on the dramatic turnabout for their own papers. For several of them, it was
the first real story filed in weeks. The work they had been doing in Phoenix
was all prepared in memorandum form, strictly for the files. Working under
deadline again reminded them what the business was all about. Even Greene
knocked out a piece for Newsday. "It feels good to be a reporter again," he
beamed that night. "But come the morn, it's back to being a slave driver."

Meanwhile there were still a few legal preliminaries to settle in Tucson
before the Adamson confession could be legally accepted.

James Muth, a Maricopa County deputy probation officer, was assigned by
Birdsall to prepare a probation report on the defendant, a standard procedure
ordered by judges as a guide in passing sentence. On Wednesday, January 19,
Muth submitted his report, complaining to the judge that he was hampered by a
lack of time and information and that he was not allowed to discuss the
Bolles murder with the killer because of the terms of the plea agreement. The
probation officer seemed upset that Adamson was getting off too easily:
"Based on the defendant's admission of guilt in the present offense, and
based on the apparent nature and sophistication of this offense-that it does
not appear to be a crime of passion but one motivated by profit, that others
with similar motivations are allegedly involved; that the elements of a good
deal of time and effort and deception on the part of the defendant all appear
to be present; and that the crime itself was indeed violent-the defendant
appears to be a person possessing very little respect for the rights and
dignity and life of others, and he is viewed by this writer to be a
significant and serious threat to the community and to society in general."

Adamson, who sat silent with his attorneys as Judge Birdsall read excerpts
from the report, briefly turned around to study the courtroom spectators.
Finding Muth, he stared at him for a few seconds. There was no expression on
his face, just a sort of detached curiosity.

Muth's report noted that Adamson's past history "suggests a pattern of
sophisticated criminal activity that has become progressively more involved
and violent, and hence one not easily changed because of its increasingly
sophisticated nature." Adamson drank heavily, to the point where he suffered
from an enlarged liver and possible cirrhosis, said the probation officer. He
smoked marijuana and snorted cocaine. He had been divorced three times, twice
from his first wife, and during 1976 had mostly lived off food stamps and his
wife's earnings as a nurse.

Muth also quoted Phoenix police detective Jon Sellers, the chief investigator
of the Bolles murder, as saying that the plea bargaining agreement, while "a
necessary and practical one," also disturbed him. For Adamson, Sellers said,
was "a coldblooded killer," one he personally hoped "will never walk the
streets again."

Besides Muth's sketchy probation report, there was one other document, dated
Monday, January 17. It was a letter to Judge Birdsall from Bolles's widow,
Rosalie.

All the pent-up emotions of long months of trying to rebuild a life for our
family without a husband and father have come to the surface in the past two
days. Sorting them out has been difficult but I have tried to face them
honestly, without apology, and accept them for what they are.

When Bruce Babbitt brought me the news of the plea arrangement with John
Adamson, I'm sure you can understand the conflicting feelings which battered
my thoughts. On the one hand, there was a sense of relief that, finally,
progress may be made toward bringing to justice all those responsible for
Don's death. But it was naturally tempered by the knowledge Adamson would not
be punished to the full extent of the law.

Don hated the necessity for plea bargaining, but he accepted it as a fact of
judicial life. I take my guidance from him. In the last analysis, that
bargain is a small price to pay for bringing to justice those whose callous
calculation makes their own culpability even more awful than Adamson's. For
without them, the children and I would still have Don.

John Adamson is an adult, responsible for his own actions, and he has no pity
from me. Perhaps someday my heart will find room for forgiveness, but right
now, the scars are still too deep. I am grateful to Mr. Babbitt and his staff
for their extraordinary job of ensuring he [Adamson] will pay a heavy penalty
for his part in this tragedy, while at the same time offering a tangible hope
that everyone involved will be brought to the bar of justice.

But a full measure of vengeance against one man is far less important to us,
and ultimately, to the entire community, than the assurance that these
vicious people will never again be free to inflict on someone else the
terrible loss which the children and I have known.

Don's integrity and devotion to truth must be worth at least that.

Judge Birdsall, clearly moved by Mrs. Bolles's letter, signed the plea
bargain agreement.

Officially, Adamson would be sentenced to forty-eight to fortynine years in
prison, with a guarantee that he would be released on parole after twenty
years and two months, dating from his arrest the previous June. The sentence
would be served in an out-of-state prison, at the express wish of Adamson,
who felt he would be murdered if jailed in Arizona.

A few days later at the preliminary hearing for Dunlap and Robison, Adamson
kept his word. The court proceeding was held in the Maricopa County
Courthouse before Superior Judge Edward C. Rapp.

"Tell me, Mr. Adamson," asked William Schafer III, the assistant attorney
general who was trying the case, "what motive was there expressed for the
killing by Mr. Dunlap?"

Adamson's voice never wavered. He still wore the prescription sunglasses
which hid his eyes and made it difficult to see who he was looking at. "That
Don Bolles had given Kemper Marley a bad time in the past, particularly over
the appointment to the racing commission, and that Marley wanted Bolles
killed. He wanted him to be the first to die."

Schaffer guided Adamson into the financial arrangements, how the $50,000
contract for the murders of Bolles, Lizanetz, and Babbitt was negotiated
after Dunlap originally rejected Adamson's request for $15,000 to kill the
reporter as "pretty high."

"So we negotiated a package price for all three," said Adamson.

"Where was this money to come from?"

"Max indicated that he had a key to the vault with Marley and that the money
would absolutely be no problem."

The questioning moved into how Adamson enlisted the aid of Robison and how
they shopped around together in various hobby shops in the Valley looking for
remote control transmitters which could be employed to detonate the bomb. In
late April, Adamson said, he traveled to San Diego with a girl friend and
purchased a used device as instructed by Robison. For several weeks, the two
experimented with the transmitter, testing it out at various locations with
mock bombs. During this time period-from mid to late May-Adamson said he met
frequently with Dunlap, who was impatient that Bolles be killed as soon as
possible.

"We've got to get this done-he's going to start on something in two weeks,"
Adamson quoted Dunlap as saying.

It was Dunlap's idea that Adamson call Bolles under the pretense of having
information about political figures and land fraud, Adamson said. A few
nights later, Adamson said, he was in the Ivanhoe bar drinking when he heard
Dick Ryan, a court stenographer, mention the reporter's name. At Adamson's
urging, Ryan called Bolles and told him that he had a man who had information
on land fraud and crooked politicians. Shortly afterwards, Adamson testified,
he himself called and then met Bolles, using a fictional story about having
an informant from San Diego who could link the state's political leaders to
land swindles. The only reason for the meeting, said Adamson, was so that he
would know what Bolles looked like.

On June 1, Adamson said, he called Bolles and set up the phony meeting at the
Clarendon. That same day, Adamson continued, Robison delivered a bomb they
had prepared several weeks before.

On the morning of the bombing, Adamson testified, he left home carrying a
pair of overalls, a camouflage hat, and the dynamite. To set up an alibi,
Adamson said he stopped by attorney Neal Roberts's office about 9:00 A.M.
After a forty -five-minute meeting, Adamson left. On the way out, however, he
said he unexpectedly ran into Max Dunlap, who also saw the attorney that
morning. The two went outside to talk privately.

"I told him to tell Mr. Smith to go to the bank, that Don Bolles would be at
the Clarendon House at eleven-thirty and it would be over then," said Adamson.

"Good," he quoted Dunlap as saying.

Adamson said that "Mr. Smith" was a pseudonym they used for Kemper Marley.

>From Roberts's office, Adamson said, he went to the Ivanhoe and drank
cranberry juice until five minutes before eleven. He then drove the
half-dozen blocks to the Clarendon parking lot where, after changing into the
overalls, he met Robison.

"I wonder if he will be here?" Adamson said Robison asked him.

Adamson said he told his partner that he was sure the reporter would arrive.
He said Robison then asked him if he had an alibi.

"Yes, I'll be at the Ivanhoe," Adamson answered.

While the two were talking, Bolles himself drove up, parking his Datsun in a
space not more than a hundred and fifty feet away. Adamson said they watched t
he tall, fair-haired reporter walk into the hotel.

Adamson then went over and attached the bomb to the reporter's car, he said,
while Robison drove his pickup truck to a spot across the parking lot,
towards the rear of the Mahoney Building. Robison, armed with a pair of
high-powered binoculars, would detonate the bomb with the model airplane
transmitter as soon as the reporter got back in it, said Adamson.

After getting out of his overalls, which he bundled up in a sheet and tossed
near a trash barrel, he drove back to the Ivanhoe and called the hotel,
having Bolles paged by the desk clerk.

"I told him the individual from San Diego was hesitant, and didn't want to be
exposed," Adamson testified. "I said I didn't have any more time to spend on
it and I'm sure he didn't either."

Bolles replied that if he should receive more information, he should bring it
to Bolles's office in the state capitol, said Adamson.

Between 11:35 and 11:40, Adamson said, the phone in the Ivanhoe rang. He said
it was for him, from Robison.

"Tell Mr. Smith to go to the bank," Adamson said he was told.

"Is it done?" he asked.

"Eyeball to eyeball," Adamson said Robison answered.

About 2:00 in the afternoon, Adamson said, Dunlap came to see him in the
Ivanhoe. Dunlap told him that it was best that they meet at that time because
Bolles was still alive. Undoubtedly, the reporter had by then told police
that Adamson was the man who lured him to the hotel. Adamson was sure to be
under police surveillance by the end of the day. Dunlap didn't want to be
linked with him, testified Adamson, so future face-to-face meetings would be
difficult.

"He did mention that the people in San Diego would be glad to hear that Don
Bolles was not coming over there because he was supposed to go over there to
investigate a bank," Adamson said. But Bolles's coworkers at the Republic knew
 of no such plans.

At the afternoon meeting at the Ivanhoe, Adamson said, he and Dunlap worked
out a plan whereby money for Adamson would be left at the office of Phoenix
attorney Tom Foster, an Adamson friend.

That night, on a charter flight arranged for him by Neal Roberts, who by then
knew of Adamson's involvement in the Bolles bombing, Adamson said he and his
wife left Phoenix. They went to Lake Havasu City, only to return the next
morning after it became apparent that his name was already being circulated
as the main suspect.

On Friday, June 4, two days after the bombing, Adamson testified he
telephoned Dunlap at home. Adamson called from the phone at the Ivanhoe. He
was worried. Upon his return from Lake Havasu, police had immediately
arrested him on an outstanding warrant for defrauding an innkeeper. A
half-dozen newspaper reporters were following him. Bolles was still alive.
Adamson said Dunlap urged him to stay calm, assuring him that, if Adamson
wanted to, he could be spirited out of the country aboard a twin-engine
airplane.

"He said that Kemper and the governor had a thing down there in Mexico and
they could get me out of the country immediately if I wanted to go,"
testified Adamson.

Dunlap told Adamson not to worry, that even if he was convicted of the attack
on Bolles, he would only serve five years, said Adamson. During the time he
was in jail, all he had to do was to keep quiet. Dunlap would send his wife
$400 a month, Adamson said he was promised.

Adamson's mention of "the governor" set the press gallery afire. They
scrambled out of the courtroom during a break in the proceedings to update
the stories. Arizona Governor Raul Castro was a friend of Kemper Marley's.
Marley had been the largest single contributor to Castro's campaign, kicking
in more than twenty thousand dollars. And Castro was the man who had
appointed Marley to the State Racing Commission the previous spring, the
appointment which Don Bolles wrote about in dissecting Marley's background.

But Adamson was vague. He admitted that he could not say for certain just who
"the governor" was. It could have been Castro or it could have been simply a
figure of speech or a nickname for just about anybody. And even if it was
Castro to whom Dunlap allegedly refer-red, owning an airplane with Marley did
not constitute a criminal case.

Neither local reporters nor the IRE team had come up with any firm business
dealings between Castro and the wealthy Marley. Meanwhile, the governor was
outraged that his name had been brought into this seedy case. "I want to
categorically deny any interest in anything in Mexico, the United States, or
anyplace else with Kemper Marley," bristled Castro after the hearing had
recessed for the day. "I have never owned, nor do I now own, any plane or
have any interest in any plane with any person whatsoever. . . . I
categorically deny that I have ever had or presently have any business
dealings with Kemper Marley."

There was one more meeting between Adamson and Dunlap, the star witness
testified the next day when the hearing resumed. About a week after the
bombing, with Bolles still clinging to life, Adamson said he went to Foster's
office for a secret meeting with Dunlap. "Max gave me a package, an envelope
containing money. He said there was just under six thousand dollars there."
Two thousand of the money, Adamson said, was to fulfill the murder contract
on Lizanetz. As Dunlap left, Adamson said he again assured him that his wife
would be financially supported if Adamson had to serve jail time.

Adamson had been a good witness. Despite intense and often tricky
cross-examination by famed Texas criminal lawyer Percy Foreman, brought in as
Dunlap's counsel for the cross-examination, Adamson stuck to his story.

Max Dunlap and James Robison were bound over to stand trial for first-degree
murder. But Kemper Marley remained free. Despite Adamson's damning testimony,
it was not enough to enable authorities to issue a warrant. Adamson had
received all of his information from Dunlap. While his testimony could be
used to corroborate allegations of Marley's involvement in the Bolles murder
conspiracy, there was only one person who could finger Marley enough to make
it stick in court: Max Dunlap.

And Dunlap, who had been raised as a son by the millionaire rancher, gave no
indication that he was ready to talk.

The Adamson confession came as a surprise to the IRE reporters, a pleasant
surprise. Somehow, seeing the wheels of justice start to move, wheels which
seemingly had been rusted in place since the state was admitted into the
Union sixty-five years before, lifted the IRE team's spirit.

It was also a fitting end to their reporting. For the project was nearly
complete. The man whose death had brought them all to Arizona was being
avenged, properly, through the courts. That, at least, was a beginning.

Their slain colleague was also being eulogized. On Saturday, January 22, Don
Bolles was posthumously given the John Peter Zenger Journalism Award by the
three-hundred member Arizona Newspapers Association for "distinguished service
 in behalf of freedom of the press and the people's right to know."

In an acceptance speech on behalf of Bolles's widow, J. Edward Murray, the
former Republic managing editor who had hired Bolles fourteen years ago,
summed up the feelings of the IRE team as it finished the project.

"We all wish that Don Bolles were alive today to make this speech," said
Murray. "But in fourteen years of trying, he was not able to make a
sufficient dent on the Arizona criminal scene to prevent his own murder."
Murray paused for a moment. Then he began asking the big questions.

"Why was Don Bolles, one of the best investigative reporters in the nation,
able to make so little progress against the criminal element here? Or against
the sleazy, soft-on-criminals attitude? And why did he have to die before
Arizona woke up to what he had been exposing for a dozen years? The answers,
it. seems to me, lie in the flawed and rotten political fabric of this state."

Murray was speaking in Tucson. There were no IRE reporters there. But up in
Phoenix, reading his speech in the Republic the next Sunday, the reporters
who had worked so long and hard in tribute to the slain reporter clipped the
Murray speech story from the paper. Many of them would take it home.

Bolles's reporting was "all but ignored by the general public, politicians,
and law enforcement," said Murray.

"That lack of reaction created the sick public conduct which invited the
conspiratorial murder. That is why Bolles's murder is an indictment of
governors, legislators and the courts for a prolonged permissiveness which
amounted to an open invitation to criminal elements to come to Arizona. That
is why Bolles's murder is an indictment of the lawyers, bankers and other
businessmen whose self-aggrandizing jungle ethics allowed them to collaborate
with the underworld even though they knew that their actions were undermining
the entire society, which they hypocritically pretended to respect. Don
Bolles-did his work extremely well. But the rest of the democratic process
failed."

Murray, urging that Bolles's work not be abandoned, had high praise for the
IRE team up in Phoenix, which, its investigative work basically completed,
was about to write its series on Arizona wrongdoing.

But then, as if he were one of them, he echoed the fears of the IRE
reporters, who worried that once the state's ills had been exposed and they
had returned home, the series would only be drowned in apathy.

"By far the most important single requirement, however, is that the people
themselves become aroused. When and if that happens, they will find ways to
make their desires known. Investigative reporting, no matter how excellent,
cannot accomplish much all by itself."

At the end of January, the IRE reporting was done. All that remained was to
write and rewrite the stories until they were in publishable form.

There was no wild farewell party. On the last Wednesday night in January,
nineteen of the reporters gathered in the apartment rented by Drehsler,
Rawlinson, and Overton. They chipped in and bought twenty dollars' worth of
Kentucky Fried Chicken and a couple of cases of beer.

But by eleven, most had returned to the hotel.

They were even too tired for a party.

By February 1, most of them had returned home.

pps. 239-251
--[cont]--
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
Omnia Bona Bonis,
All My Relations.
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to