In a message dated 12/7/03 3:03:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-Caveat Lector-
According to reliable sources, Millegan, YOU were the source of those forged messages, and it was part of a Cointelpro-style operation of which you are a part. You haven't been able to find a single person to support you in your false and slanderous charges, and your fellow Cointelpro operatives are afraid to come out of the shadows to prop you up for fear of being exposed and being tainted by you. That's what some people in the know are saying.
ROTFLMAO. McFraud, that is quite funny. You really lie quite outrageously. Pray tell, who are your reliable sources? So let us see are the messages forged or not? Hmm, so you say that Jim Rarey, Mark Urban and Bob have not all stated publicly that they never received the "cc'd" messages. Do you also deny that Anton Chaitkin also commented that the first "purported" email from Brian Quig was an obvious forgery. Brian spelled Chaitkin's name wrong and there was also a factual error about EIR's stance on Chalabi plus other "disparaging" remarks about EIR.
These people in the know. Interesting how you always capitalize cointelpro, and then use cointelpro methodology in your postings. This very laughable current posting included.
Why not fess up?
You mean like Fess in 1957?
(Whip sound) Get up there,
H'ya (whip sound)
Oooh Oooh
Oh wringle wrangle
Jingy jong jangle (whistle, whip)
Mighty fine horse
I'm in love of course
Cause I got me a pretty woman's love
Wringle wrangle
Jingy jong jangle (whistle, whip)
Spurs on my boots
And I don't give a hoot
'Cause I got me a pretty woman's love
With a dollar's worth of beans,
And a new pair of jeans
Got a woman to cook and wash...and things
Oh wringle wrangle
Jingy jong jangle (whistle, whip)
If I die I ain't-a gonna cry
'Cause I got me a pretty woman's love
Wringle wrangle
Wringle wrangle
Yes, I got me a pretty woman's love
Feel free to take all this to court, and we can sort it all out. As you know, I maintain dated, nonrewritable CD records of all my communications, and I am happy to put all that documentation on the table.
I do not feel slandered, because you aren't a real person and you have already been caught in two internet frauds and have no credibility -- no matter how hard you try. And again, are there forged emails or not? You claimed both times to have received the email "produced" by webfairy and the one posted by Eastman -- which you above now claim - "Millegan, YOU were the source of those forged messages." So just what do you have documentation of?
Many people have come to the conclusion that your gambit with the "forged" messages was part of an effort to shut down any questions about the circumstances of Brian Quig's death. Now, who would be in a hurry to rule out the possible assassination angle on Quig? Well, his possible assassins, for one.
So, since I caught you and yours red-handed using "forged" emails, I am being accused of being an accomplice in the death of Brian Quig. You really have no shame do you McFraud? Again, who are these many people that "have come to the conclusion that your gambit"? Don't ya think you are reaching a bit for that?
With regard to "disparaging" you: haven't you ever participated in a graduate seminar at a first-rate university, and engaged in vigorous give-and-take with others in the spirit of friendly truth-seeking?
I am friendly and quite benign with most, I don't care for BS, and from you I see a lot. Again you are fraud, before you wish to carry on discourse you must give me a reason. There is none you have no credibility ... as you continue to show.
Actually, what is your educational background exactly? Is it safe to say you don't have a degree in any field related to history? Yes? No? You don't come across as someone who does.
You seem to have had no experience in historical and scholarly discussion and debate. You treat any disagreement as a personal attack on yourself. This is not the way intelligent people conduct conspiracy research, or research of any kind, especially historical research. For real scholars, disagreements and differences are opportunities for mutual enlightenment.
Again, you just continue to attack me and disparge my abilities. Please post where I "treat any disagreement as a personal attack on myself?" Please show me a"real scholar" that has produced an article showing how the whole Prescott/Nazi thing has been deliberately lied about even up to recent times. Please show me another "real scholar" that has written about the link between the origins of the oil business and Skull & Bones. And again, what the ____ have you done except snipe cowardly from the shadows and throw out wild accusations.
For cultists, differences and disagreements are occasions for bitter personal feuds and holy wars. Conspiracy theorizing is just an ego trip for them -- any facts which threatens their theory threatens to shatter their ego and sense of self. This is why they become very angry and hostile when their views are challenged.
No, I am just reminding you that your persona is a fraud and for folks to not get "attached" to you because of your "bonafides" that you post to endear yourself as a "concerned citizen" that is a false front of boiler-plated cointelpro action.
Peace,
Om
Kris Millegan
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om 2">
