>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2002 10:42 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] 9-11 Conspiracy Theories Abound on Net
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> that essentially seems to be the reaction/conclusion of
> lots of ordinary (even quite intelligent) folk i try to
> talk to ab
-Caveat Lector-
that essentially seems to be the reaction/conclusion of
lots of ordinary (even quite intelligent) folk i try to
talk to about all of this 'second opinion' info on 9-11 &
ither subjects. It just can't be true ergo it is not true &
anyone who believes it is is a kook. Cept t
e follows ---
Date sent: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 12:15:38 -0500
Send reply to: Conspiracy Theory Research List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Edward Britton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:[CTRL] 9-11 Conspiracy Theories Abound on Net
-Caveat Lector-
--- RevCOAL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did you notice that while the author lumped in 9/11
conspiracy theories with UFOs and space aliens, the
author pointedly does NOT offer any EVIDENCE to refute
any of the 9/11 theories? They are just labled as
'kooky', and left at that...
-Caveat Lector-
June:
>Did you notice that while the author lumped in 9/11 conspiracy theories
>with UFOs and space aliens, the author pointedly does NOT offer any
>EVIDENCE to refute any of the 9/11 theories?
Yep, I noticed. I also noticed his repeated citation of the central reason
behind
-Caveat Lector-
Did you notice that while the author lumped in 9/11 conspiracy theories
with UFOs and space aliens, the author pointedly does NOT offer any
EVIDENCE to refute any of the 9/11 theories? They are just labled as
'kooky', and left at that...
Which suggests that perhaps some of the t
-Caveat Lector-
Source: http://www.fresnobee.com/24hour/nation/story/217123p-2093899c.html
ANALYSIS: Conspiracy theories arise from Sept. 11 attacks
By JAMES ROSEN, McClatchy Washington Bureau
(Published Friday, January, 11, 2002 9:01PM)
WASHINGTON (SMW) - Even in the wake of unspeakable ev
