-Caveat Lector-
-Caveat Lector-
9-11 EVIDENCE KIT - The Truth About Sept 11
-----Original Message-----
From: Gerard Holmgren
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 June 2003 13:12
To: Undisclosed Recipients
Subject: evidence kit
(The Web pages below have been backed up.
If any links are dead, the backed up page can
be mailed on request.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
THE TRUTH ABOUT SEPT 11
Last updated June 14 2003
-------------------------------------------------------
Section 1: Airforce stand-down
1:1 It has become popular mythology in the media
that fighter jets were scrambled to intercept the
hijacked planes. This is completely untrue as the
following research shows.
Guilty For 9-11: Bush, Rumsfeld, Myers,
by Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel, 14 Nov 2001
http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-1.htm
1:2 Mr. Cheney's Cover Story -- Section 2
of Guilty For 9-11, 20 Nov 2001
http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-2.htm
1:3 9-ll: Nothing Urgent, by George Szamuely,
Research & documentation by Illarion Bykov
and Jared Israel, Jan 2002
http://emperor.vwh.net/indict/urgent.htm
1:4 Planes "did scramble " on 9/11,
they just "arrived late"
http://www.emperors-clothes.com/indict/faq.htm
1:5 Scrambled Messages, by George Szamuely,
12 Dec 2001
http://www.nypress.com/14/50/taki/bunker.cfm
1:6 Air National Guard Mission and Vision statements
http://nerdcities.com/guardian/SeptemberEleventh/ang-mission.htm
1:7 Russian Air Force chief says official 9/11 story impossible
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/airf.htm
Scrambling of fighter jets to intercept stray
aircraft is a routine procedure.
Here's an example of how routine it is.
6/16/03
Careful guys. Almost all of this stuff regarding the Air Force stand down IS WRONG!
We have recently completed our research on 9/11 and these allegations are simply based
on wrong information. There was almost certainly NO STAND DOWN.
There were no fictitious hijackers. They were real.
There was foreknowledge enough to speculate on.
I interviewed people from Andrews AFB just after 9/11, and some months later. The reasons
for not scrambling fighters is more mundane than stand down orders BUT MUCH MORE SERIOUS
FOR US.
We are producing a multimedia CD with the very best info to date and some real analysis rater than
conspiratorial mumbo jumbo. The real answers will not come as a surprise to many of you, but the
bullshit will be explained away.
FTW is wrong about the stand down.
Emporer's Clothes is wrong about the stand down.
I warned each of them early on that they were jumping the gun but they committed to this theory.
This has lost them credibility and sent them off on wild goose chases.
This is not a put down of either of them. Their other work on 9/11 is valuable. But they should
not have committed to speculation so early.
Stay tuned.
NUREV
1.13 Jet Sent to probe Fla. Gov. Plane.www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Netscape news. May 15 2003.
http://channels.netscape.com/ns/news/story.jsp?floc=NW_2-T&oldflok=FF-APO-11
10&idq=/ff/story/0001/20030515/001648315.htm&sc=1110&floc=NW_2-T
The procedures were already in place before
Sept 11 2001. It happened 67 times in the 10 months
between September 2000 and June 2001.
1.8 Use of military jets jumps since 9/11.
Associated Press Aug 13 2002.
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/completetimeline/2002/ap081302.html
1.9 CBS News. Scrambling to prevent another
9/11 Aug 14 2002
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/08/14/attack/main518632.shtml
1.10 Preventing another 9/11 Military.com
http://www.military.com/NewsContent/1,13319,FL_jet_081502,00.html
1.11 ABC News Jets on high Alert. Aug 13 2002.
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/homefront020813.html
1.12 Military now notified immediately of unusual
air traffic events. Fox news Aug 12 2002
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,60245,00.html#top
So on Sept 11, 2001 - Why were no fighter jets
scrambled, and why has a cover up story been
concocted?
In the unlikely event that the airforce failed
through incompetence, ( not once but 4 times! )
where is the major inquiry?
I have seen bigger inquiries into car crashes
at race tracks.
-------------------------------------------------------
Section 2: Complicit behaviour of G.W.Bush
It has become common mythology in the media
that George W. Bush was at Booker Elementary
School when he learned of the first WTC crash.
This is a lie. Why is Bush lying about where he
was, and what he knew?
2:1 Guilty for 9-11 Section 3: Bush in the open
by Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel.
http://www.emperors-clothes.com/indict/indict-3.htm
This is not the only lie Bush has told about his
movements that morning. See how many times
he has changed his story.
2:2 Sept 11 attacks- evidence of US collusion
by Steve Grey.
http://austin.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=2342&group=webcast
(Read the section called "A tangle of lies")
2.3 Bush gets tangled in his lies Part 1.
A strange press conference. By Jared israel
and Francisco Gil-White Sept 25 2002.
http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/calif1.htm
2:4 Bush Gets Tangled in his 9-11 Lies, Part 2:
White House Cover-up Creates More Problems
than it Solves by Jared Israel and Francisco
Gil-White [7 October 2002]
http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/calif2.htm
2:5 The President as Incompetent Liar:
Bush's Claim that he Saw TV Footage of 1st
Plane Hitting WTC. Comments by Jared Israel
[Posted 12 September 2002]
http://emperors-clothes.com/indict/liar.htm
Clinton was impeached for lying about an affair.
Bush is lying about where he was, what he was
doing and what he knew, during the crucial
period between 8.45 and 9 AM on Sept 11.
-------------------------------------------------------
Why did the President - after being told "America
is under attack" continue to listen to schoolchildren
reading for another 25 minutes ? Why was he
cheering, smiling and joking even as it was known
that at least one more hijacked plane was on the
loose ? View the TV footage which proves treason
at the top level.
2:6 http://www.emperors-clothes.com/indict/vid.htm
-------------------------------------------------------
Section 3: The Fictitious Hijackers
If 19 Arabs hijacked the planes, why are there
no Arabic names on any of the passenger lists?
If they used non-Arabic aliases, which of the
"innocents " on the lists are alleged to be the
hijackers?
3:1 http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA11.victims.html
Passenger and crew list for AA 11 (first WTC crash.)
3:2 http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA77.victims.html
AA 77 (Pentagon crash)
3:3
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua175.victims.html
UAL 175 (2nd WTC crash)
3:4 http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/ua93.victims.html
UAL 93 (Pennsylvania crash)
If they are alleged to have been using non-Arabic
aliases (19 obviously Arabic men got on board
using non-Arabic ID, with 100% success rate ?),
why did the FBI claim that they were traced through
the use of credit cards to buy tickets in their own
names?
If 9 of the alleged hijackers were searched before
boarding, as claimed in this article
3:5 http://www.policetalk.com/9_hijackers.html
why is there no airport security footage of them?
How did they (allegedly) get on board with knives,
guns, AND electronic guidance systems, while being
searched, but avoiding security cameras and not
being on the passenger lists?
What aliases were they alleged to be using when
they were searched,and if they were not using
aliases, why are they not on the passenger lists?
What of reports that some of the alleged hijackers
are still alive, and had nothing to do with the attacks ?
3:6 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm
3:7 http://www.rense.com/general20/alives.htm
3:8 http://www.muslimedia.com/archives/world01/afgwar-die.htm
3:9
http://www.americanfreepress.net/10_12_01/STILL_ALIVE__FBI_Mixed_Up_on_T/sti
ll_alive__fbi_mixed_up_on_t.html
3:10 http://www.corpust.com/CorpusTArchiveFBI70f19Alive.cfm
3.12 http://www.welfarestate.com/911/
3.13 http://truedemocracy.net/td4/24s-c-6men.html
3.14 http://www.abqtrib.com/archives/news01/092001_news_trail.shtml
3.15
http://www.portal.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/09/23/widen
23.xml
3.16 http://www.worldmessenger.20m.com/alive.html
3.17 http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/NEWSTF/stfch11.htm
3.18
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-0109190363sep19.story?col
l=chi-news-hed
According to this article
3:11
http://216.239.33.100/search?q=cache:uEUylyDIXdYC:www.dallasnews.com/sharedc
ontent/dallas/nation/9-11/stories/121202dnint911gas.928b2377.html+FBI+Agent:
+Sept.+11+Hijackers+Probably+Used+Gas&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
the FBI now claims that the hijackers used gas to
subdue the passengers and crew. If they used gas
they would have been affected themselves - unless
they had masks. The story gets better all the time.
They somehow got on board with masks, gas, guns,
knives and electronic guidance systems, in spite of
being searched, didn't show up on the airport security
cameras, and were not on the passenger lists.
They left flight manuals in Arabic in rented cars
outside the airport (last minute brushing up on the
way there, about how to fly the things!) and then
crashed the planes in breath taking displays of
skilled piloting. Just to make sure we knew who
they were, their passports were conveniently found
in spite of fiery crashes which incinerated the planes
and occupants. So they got on board with false
IDs but used their real passports ?
If the mythical Arab hijackers really were on the
planes and airport security systems failed due
to incompetence (not once but 19 times!), where
is the major inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries
into racehorse doping scandals.
-------------------------------------------------------
Section 4: More oddities
Why the official story concerning the hijacking
of AA11 (first WTC crash) cannot possibly be true.
4:1 9/11 Redux: (The Observerąs Cut) American
Airlines Flight 11, Re-examined By David L. Graham
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/redux.html
Was an urban rescue team sent to New York
the night before the attacks?
4:2 http://www.halturnershow.com/FEMA.htm
4:3 http://www.tpromo.com/gk/jun02/062602.htm
4.4 Former top German Cabinet Minister rejects
official story of 9 11 attacks. Interview with Andreas
von Buelow. Tagesspiegel Jan 13 2002.
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/VonBuelow.html
National Security Advisor Rice and WhiteHouse
spokesman Fleischer lied in saying that nobody
had ever conceived of planes being used in this
manner, their statements in this article,
Bush Was Warned of Hijackings Before 9/11;
Lawmakers Want Public Inquiry ABC News
May 16 2002
4:5 http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/warningmemo020516.html
when the 1994 extract from Time magazine,
quoted in article 2:1 demonstrates that the potential
problem had been recognized for decades.
And there are other examples of this possibility
having been widely recognized prior to Sept 11.
4:6 "Omens of terror." by David Wise Oct 7 2001
http://www.hermes-press.com/omens.htm
In article 4:5 Rice also lied in saying that any threat
had been overwhelmingly perceived as being overseas.
The statement she made is in this press briefing.
4:7 Press Briefing by National Security Advisor
Dr. Condoleezza Rice. The James S. Brady Briefing
Room May 16 2002 . 4.10PM EDT
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/05/20020516-13.html
But this is the truth about the memo to which she refers.
4:8 August memo focused on attacks in the U.S. by
Bob Wooward and Dan Eggen. Washington Post
staff writers. May 18 2002. page A01.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A3
5744-2002May17¬Found=true
What did happen to Flight 93? by Richard Wallace.
The Daily Mirror Sept 13, 2002
4:9 http://www.unansweredquestions.net/timeline/2002/mirror091302.html
4:10 http://www.thepowerhour.com/postings-three/flight-93-shot-down.htm
4.11
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/page.cfm?objectid=12192317&method=full&
siteid=50143
Are cell phone calls from planes, of the type
allegedly made by passengers on Sept 11 possible?
4:12
http://feralnews.com/issues/911/dewdney/project_achilles_report_1_030123.htm
l
4.13
http://feralnews.com/issues/911/dewdney/project_achilles_report_2_030225.htm
l
-------------------------------------------------------
Section 5: Where is the evidence against Bin laden?
Why is it that the US government doesn't feel
confident enough of it's case against Bin laden
to lay any formal charges, but keeps " finding"
convenient video " confession" tapes ?
Probably because new video technology makes
it impossible to distinguish between a real video
confession and a fake.
When seeing and hearing isn't believing.
by William M. Arkin. Washington Post Feb 1 1999
5:1 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/dotmil/arkin020199.htm
Last word in High Tech trickery. by David Higgins
Sydney Morning Herald. may 16 2002
5:2 http://smh.com.au/articles/2002/05/16/1021415016681.html
For more detailed evidence of a preplanned
agenda to fabricate evidence against Bin Laden,
Sept 11 attacks- evidence of US collusion by Steve Grey.
2:2 http://austin.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=2342&group=webcast
(Read the section called "Evidence please !")
It has become a common myth that Bin Laden
has admitted to the attacks. This simply isn't true.
Bin laden denies terror attacks and points
finger at Jews. Annanova news.
5:3
http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_410936.html?menu=news.latestheadlines
Bin laden denies attacks as Taliban talks holy war.
ABC news online Sept 17 2001.
5:4 http://www.abc.net.au/news/2001/09/item20010917010639_1.htm
Bin Laden denies being behind attacks. JS ONline
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Sept 16 2001
5:5 http://www.jsonline.com/news/nat/sep01/binladen-denial.asp
Osama Bin Laden claims terrorist attacks in USA
were committed by some American terrorist group.
Pravda Sept 12 2001
5:6 http://english.pravda.ru/accidents/2001/09/12/14910.html
Bin laden Denies US attack says paper. Middle East News
5:7 http://www.metimes.com/2K1/issue2001-37/reg/bin_laden_denies.htm
Bin laden says he wasn't behind attacks CNN Sept 17 2001
5:8 http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/09/16/inv.binladen.denial/index.html
Bin Laden denies role in attacks. newsday.com Sept 17 2001
5:9 http://www.newsday.com/ny-wobin172369727sep17,0,7370581.story
Taliban says Bin Laden denied role in attacks.
Yahoo news Sept 13 2001.
5:10 http://www.welfarestate.com/binladen/denies-reuters-taliban.htm
-------------------------------------------------------
Section 6: Insider trading reveals high level foreknowledge
In the first few hours after the attacks, it was reported
that investigators were already looking into huge
volumes of insider trading on airline stocks in the
weeks leading up to the attacks.
Why has this story since completely disappeared?
Do authorities seriously expect us to believe that
more than a year later, they still do not know who
was responsible? Should not alarm bells have
been ringing BEFORE the attacks with these
record volumes of trading?
If the executive director of the CIA had previously
managed the firm which handled much of the trade,
are we seriously expected to believe that he
doesn't know who was responsible?
Suppressed Details of Criminal Insider Trading
Lead Directly Into The CIA's Highest Ranks --
CIA Executive Director `Buzzy' Krongard Managed
Firm That Handled `Put' Options on UAL,
by Michael C. Ruppert, 9 Oct 2001
6:1 http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/10_09_01_krongard.html
Mystery of terror `insider dealers',
by Chris Blackhurst, 14 Oct 2001
6:2 http://www.independent.co.uk/story.jsp?story=99402
Profits of Death -- Insider Trading and 9-11,
by Tom Flocco - Edited by Michael C. Ruppert,
6 Dec 2001
6:3 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/FLO112B.html
Where is the major inquiry? I have seen bigger
inquiries into local government contract scandals.
-------------------------------------------------------
Section 7: The pentagon frame up and the WTC
plane switch
It is alleged that American Airlines 77
(a hijacked Boeing 757) crashed into the Pentagon.
A Boeing 757 is a very large aircraft with a wingspan
of 125 ft and a length of 155 ft. So how did it make
an initial hole 12 ft wide, collapsing only about a
35 ft depth of the outer ring of the building -
and not leave any wreckage outside ?
This photo of the damage to the Pentagon wall
7:1 http://66.129.143.7/june2aa.htm
proves that whatever crashed into the pentagon
was NOT AA 77, which demonstrates the Pentagon
attack to have been a self-inflicted frame up.
For a quick overview of the impossibility
of the official story
7:2 http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm
For a full physical analysis of the crash scene
Physical and mathematical analysis of Pentagon
crash. by Gerard Holmgren Oct 2002
7:3 http://alberta.indymedia.org/news/2002/10/4578.php
Why was there a concerted effort to fabricate
eyewitness evidence for the official story regarding
AA 77?
Did AA 77 hit the Pentagon? Eyewitness accounts
examined. by Gerard Holmgren June 2002
7:4
http://hamilton.indymedia.org:8081/front.php3?article_id=1786&group=webcast
7:5 The Pentagon crash hoax
http://nerdcities.com/guardian/SeptemberEleventh/WhatHitThePentagon/
What hit WTC towers? Were they the planes
we've been told ? ( AA 11 and UAL 175)
http://whatzit.bravepages.com
-------------------------------------------------------
Section 8: If the Attack on Afghanistan was a
retaliation for Sept 11, why had it already been
planned months before ?
BBC News report by George Arney.
8:1
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/south_asia/newsid_1550000/1550366.stm
U.S. Planned for attack on Al -Qaida. White house
given strategy two days before Sept 11.
NBC news. May 16 2002
8:2
http://216.239.33.100/search?q=cache:A5WwRGMKgTYC:www.unansweredquestions.ne
t/timeline/2002/msnbc051602.html+U.S.+Planned+for+attack+on+Al+-Qaeda.+White
+house+given+strategy+two+days+before+Sept+11.&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
US planned to hit bin Laden ahead of
September 11. By David Rennie in Washington
8:3
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2002/08/05/walq05.xml
US Tells of covert Afghan plans before 9/11
By Bob Drogin LA Times May 18 2002
8.5 http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-051802strike.story
Why were we originally told that the attack on
Afghanistan was not planned prior to Sept 11,
and was purely a retaliation to a " surprise "
attack, and the story then changed after proof
of the preplanned attack came to light ?
-------------------------------------------------------
Section 9: U.S. and Bin Laden co-operate behind
the scenes.
The new story is that they allegedly feared Bin Laden
so much that they wanted to get him first. So why
didn't they arrest him when they had the chance
in July 2001?
The CIA met Bin Laden while undergoing treatment
at an American Hospital last July in Dubai, by
Alexandra Richard, Translated courtesy of Tiphaine
Dickson, Le Figaro, 11 Oct 2001
9:1 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/RIC111B.html
9:2 http://guardian.co.uk/waronterror/story/0,1361,584444,00.html
9:3 http://emperors-clothes.com/misc/lefigaro.htm
Bin Laden met with the CIA in July and walked
away by Michael C. Ruppert
9:4 http://www.rense.com/general16/bin.htm
And why was the Bush family still in business
with the Bin Laden Family, even AFTER Sept 11?
Osama bin Laden's Bush family Business
Connections, Alliance With Pakistan Will Stimulate
Drug Trade, Bring Revenues Under U.S. Control
--Colombian Opium Production Will Soar;
The Taliban's Biggest Economic Attack on the
U.S. Came in February With The Destruction of
Its Opium Crop by Michael C. Ruppert,
18 Sept 2001
9:5 http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/09_18_01_bushbin.html
Carlyle profit from Afghan war,
by David Lazarus, 2 Dec 2001
9:6 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/LAZ112A.html
Elder Bush in Big G.O.P. Cast Toiling for
Top Equity Firm, by Leslie Wayne, 5 Mar 2001
9:7 http://www.truthout.com/0662.Bush.Saudi.htm
The George W. Bush Money Tree
9:8 http://www.bushnews.com/bushmoney.htm
Bush Family's dirty little secret: President's oil
companies funded by Bin Laden family and wealthy
Saudis who financed Osama bin Laden,
by Rick Wiles, Sept 2001
9:9 http://www.americanfreedomnews.com/afn_articles/bushsecrets.htm
Arms Build-up Enriches Carlyle Group,
Bush Sr. is Consultant, by Mark Fineman,
10 Jan 2002
9:10 http://www.truthout.com/01.11F.Arms.Carlyle.htm
Gaping holes in the CIA V Bin Laden Story by Jared Israel
9:11 http://emperors-clothes.com/news/probestop-i.htm
BushLaden by Jared Israel
9:12 http://emperors-clothes.com/news/bushladen.htm
Addition to the above article
9:13 http://emperors-clothes.com/news/bushladen2-i.htm
Judicial Watch: Bush/Bin Laden connection
"has now turned into a scandal" Statement from
Judicial watch with comments by Jared Israel
9:14 http://emperors-clothes.com/news/jw.htm
9:15 Bin laden. Terrorist monster: Take two !
by Jared Israel. Oct 9 2001
http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/taketwo-a.htm
9:16 New Chairman of 9/11 Commission had
business ties with Osama's Brother in Law
by Michel Chossudovsky 27 December 2002
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO212A.html
And why did the US turn down an offer to
extradite Bin Laden in 1996, AFTER naming
him as wanted for the 1993 WTC bombing?
-------------------------------------------------------
Section 10: The suspicious collapse
of the World trade centre Towers.
How did the WTC collapse? Why no serious inquiry?
Why was the debris rushed away for recycling
before any examination could be held?
10:1 Muslims suspend laws of physics
by J. McMichael Nov 25 2001
http://www.public-action.com/911/jmcm/physics_1.html
10:2 Muslims suspend laws of Physics. p
art 2 by J.McMichael
http://serendipity.li/wot/mslp_ii.htm
"Burning Questions...Need Answers":
Fire Engineering's Bill Manning Calls for
Comprehensive Investigation of WTC Collapse,
4 Jan 2002
10:3 http://zgrams.zundelsite.org/pipermail/zgrams/2002-January/000200.html
10:4 http://www.fivedoves.com/letters/jan2002/markr19-12.htm
10:5
http://www.nyenvirolaw.org/PDF/FireEngineering-1-4-02-BurningQuestionsNeedAn
swers.pdf
10:6 A firefighter says "we think there were
bombs set in the building"
http://people.aol.com/people/special/0,11859,174592-3,00.html
10:7 In Curious Battle: An expert recants on
Why the WTC collapsed by John Flaherty
and Jared Israel
http://emperors-clothes.com/news/albu.htm
10:8 Documentary footage from the scene
of the WTC attacks, and eyewitness accounts
from firefighters at the scene reveal serious
flaws in the official accounts.
http://www.thepowerhour.com/postings/911-oddities-revealed.htm
For a series of engineering articles and
informative videos on the WTC collapse, see
10:9 http://home.attbi.com/~jmking/Collapse_update.htm
10:10 Evidence of explosives in South WTC
Tower collapse
http://la.indymedia.org/news/2002/12/23816.php
10:11 The World Trade Centre demolition
http://www.nerdcities.com/guardian/WTC/wtc-demolition.htm
10:12 Chapter 1 of the FEMA WTC collapse report
(with comment)
http://www.nerdcities.com/guardian/WTC/WTC_ch1.htm
10:13 Chapter 2 (with comment)
http://www.nerdcities.com/guardian/WTC/WTC_ch2.htm
10.14 The jet fuel. How hot did it heat the World trade Center?
http://www.uscrusade.com/forum/config.pl/read/1064
10.15 Proof of controlled demolition at the WTC by Jerry Russell, Ph.D.
http://www.attackonamerica.net/proofofcontrolleddemolitionatwtc.htm
10.16 Where's the inferno?
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/wtc_fire.htm
Steel melts at 1539 degrees. Jet fuel (kerosene)
burns at 800 degrees. Are we seriously expected to
believe that burning kerosene towards the top of
the building (heat travels upwards) somehow
caused both towers to neatly implode in a manner
identical to that of a controlled demolition ?
Where is the inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries
into suburban housefires. Why is discussion of
the possibility of a controlled implosion completely
taboo? Why do authorities keep inventing
ridiculous stories about burning jet fuel melting
steel?
-------------------------------------------------------
Section 11: Hands off Bin Laden !
Why were the FBI told to not investigate
the Bin Laden family links in the US?
Has someone been sitting on the FBI? Transcript
of a BBC Newsnight Report on "the questionable
links of the bin Laden Family," 6 Nov 2001
11:1 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/BBC111A.html
11:2 http://emperors-clothes.com/news/probetrans.htm
(added comments by Jared Israel)
Bush thwarted FBI probe against bin Ladens,
Hindustan Times, 7 Nov 2001
11:3 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/HIN111A.html
US efforts to make peace summed up by `oil',
by Lara Marlowe, 19 Nov 2001
11:4 http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/MAR111A.html
11:5 http://www.fisiusa.org/fisi_News_items/news369.htm
Called Off the Trail? FBI Agents Probing Terror
Links Say They Were Told, ‘Let Sleeping Dogs Lie’
By Brian Ross and Vic Walker. ABC News
Dec 19 2002
11:6
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/primetime/DailyNews/FBI_whistleblowers021219.
html
After capturing one of the six most wanted
Taliban leaders, the US then let him go. "By mistake "
of course, because of "flawed intelligence."
11:7 Taliban general 'freed by mistake'
Sunday Times Dec 19 2002
http://www.sundaytimes.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,7034,5704967%255E1557
4,00.html
11:8 US accidentally set wanted Taliban
Leader free. Clari news dec 18 2002.
http://quickstart.clari.net/qs_se/webnews/wed/bn/Qus-attacks-taliban.RVGa_CD
I.html
11:9 FBI agent Robert Wright says FBI
assigned to intelligence operations continue
to protect terrorists from criminal investigations
and prosecutions. Judicial Watch Sept 11, 2002.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/2469.shtml
-------------------------------------------------------
Section 12: Its really not so surprising.
In 1962, the joint chiefs of staff approved a CIA
plan to commit terrorist acts against the US
and frame Cuba.
Friendly Fire -- Book: U.S. Military Drafted Plans
to Terrorize U.S. Cities to Provoke War With
Cuba, by David Ruppe, 1 May 2001
12:1 http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/jointchiefs_010501.html
Pentagon Proposed Pretexts for Cuba Invasion
in 1962, The National Security Archive, 30 Apr 2001
12:2 http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20010430/
Northwoods - a plan for terror to justify war.
Comments by Jared Israel.
12:3 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-int.htm
Scanned images of the actual document.
12.4 Page i http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-i.htm
12.5 Page ii http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-ii.htm
12:6 Page iii http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-iii.htm
12.7 Page 1 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-1.htm
12.8 Page 2 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-2.htm
12.9 Page 3 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-3.htm
12.10 Page 4 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-4.htm
12.11 Page 5 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-5.htm
12.12 Page 6 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-6.htm
12.13 Page 7 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-7.htm
12.14 Page 8 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-8.htm
12.15 Page 9 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-9.htm
12:16 Page 10 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-10.htm
12.17 Page 11 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-11.htm
12.18 Page 12 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-12.htm
US military schemes- ominously like 9/11.
12:19 http://emperors-clothes.com/misc/bamford.htm
If such tactics were considered normal and
acceptable practice by the Government in 1962,
what evidence is there that things have changed?
Henry Kissinger advocated a similar strategy in 1992
12:20 http://www.spotlight.org/Newsbureau/Prisoner/Media/media.html
as Did Zbigniew Brzezinski in 1997.
A War in the Planning for Four Years. HOW STUPID
DO THEY THINK WE ARE? Zbigniew Brzezinski
and the CFR Put War Plans In a 1997 Book - It Is
"A Blueprint for World Dictatorship," Says a
Former German Defense and NATO Official Who
Warned of Global Domination in 1984, in an
Exclusive Interview With FTW by Michael C. Ruppert
12:21 http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/zbig.html
-------------------------------------------------------
Section 13: Who created and funded the
Al Qaeda Network?
A Vital Piece of the Puzzle: Dollars for Terror --
The United States and Islam, by Carol Brouillet.
13:1 http://www.communitycurrency.org/vital.html
Bin Laden in the Balkans - Collection of mainstream
media articles. Compiled by Jared Israel
13:2 http://emperors-clothes.com/news/binl.htm
The Creation called Osama by Shamsul Islam
13:3 http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/creat.htm
"Articles documenting US creation of
Taliban and Bin Laden's terrorist network"
Series of links to different articles
13:4 http://emperors-clothes.com/docs/doc.htm
"Osama Bin Laden: Made in USA" by Jared Israel
13:5 http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/madein.htm
"Bush and the media cover up the Jihad
schoolbook scandal" by Jared Israel
13:6 http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/jihad.htm
U.S. Protects Al-Qaeda Terrorists in Kosovo,
by Umberto Pascali, 2 Nov 2001
13:7 http://globalresearch.ca/articles/PAS111A.html
Which Terrorists are worse? Al Quaeda?
Or the KLA? by Jared Israel
13:8 http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/kla-aq.htm
-------------------------------------------------------
Section14 : Who created the civil war in Afghanistan?
Interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski, President
Jimmy Carter's National Security Adviser
[Posted 6 October 2001]
Ex- National Security Chief Brzezinski admits:
Afghan war and Islamism were made in Washington
14:1 http://emperors-clothes.com/interviews/brz.htm
-------------------------------------------------------
Section 15: Why have the President and Vice
President resisted moves for an inquiry into
Sept 11? Bush asks Daschle to limit Sept. 11
probes -- CNN Jan 29 2002.
15:1 http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/01/29/inv.terror.probe
Bush, GOP blast calls for 9/11 inquiry. CNN May 17 2002
15:2 http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/05/16/president.gop.senators
Daschle: Bush, Cheney Urged No Sept. 11
Inquiry Reuters newswire UK May 26 2002
15:3 http://www.newsfrombabylon.com/article.php?sid=1680
Bush and Cheney Block 9-11 Investigation
By Mike Hersh Oct 24, 2002, 2:22pm
15:4
http://www.mikehersh.com/Bush_and_Cheney_Block_911_Investigation_.shtml
Bush Was Warned of Hijackings Before 9/11;
Lawmakers Want Public Inquiry ABC News
May 16 2002
4:5 http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/warningmemo020516.html
15.5 Bush opposes 9/11 query panel.
CBS News. May 23 2002.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/05/15/attack/main509096.shtml
15:6 9/11 Panel asks what briefers told Bush.
White House retreats on independent probe.
Dana Priest and Dana Milbank.
Washington Post Sept 21 2002. Page A01
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A4
6446-2002Sep20¬Found=true
15.7 White House refuses to release Sept 11 info.
by Frank Davies Miami Herald May 5 2003
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/5792329.htm?template=contentModules/pri
ntstory.jsp
-------------------------------------------------------
BEFORE MORE PEOPLE GET THEIR ARMS
AND LEGS BLOWN OFF WORLDWIDE IN
THE MAD 'WAR ON TERROR' --- PLEASE
FORWARD THIS MAIL; DO THE RESEARCH;
AND COMMUNICATE & ACT.
--- PLEASE FORWARD ---
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
