-Caveat Lector-

This is an edited essay...as a theory piece it
contains a lot of new ideas, such as why were so many
videotapers on the 9-11 scene, why didn't they drop
their cameras or stop filming when the planes hit, why
didn't they scream out on the audio tape backgrounds,
why did they all seem perfectly situated from the west
side hyway to even a high rise in Jersey City, NJ?  On
and on...these silent film stars appear to have been
included in the 9-11 proceedings...and the Commission
never even quizzed them about who staged em.  This
article is much fuller...you might enjoy the questions
it puts forth.  So...read on...E. Murray
_________________________________________________

9-11 RE-CONDITIONED

Boyer, Anne.  2004.  "9-11 Re-conditioned:  The Slyest
Bank Heist in World History."  Internet:  CTRL & MFHR.
 3 p.
__________________________________________________

In the aftermath of the 9/11/2001 disasters at New
York’s World Trade Center Towers, Washington DC’s
Pentagon and the downing of the aircraft in
Pennsylvania, a number of odd questions arose to this
author about the tragedies.  For example, if Arab
nations or organizations were responsible and if their
motives were simply for terrorist reasons, what did
they expect the tragedy's outcomes to yield?  What did
they expect the outcomes would be and so, what was
their motive?  Did they expect to gain land on the
West Bank?  Terror for terror's sake does not make
sense.  Did they expect to gain credibility from some
outside source which would help them to thwart further
problems with Marxist-Zionists? Was getting publicity
for their cause enough of a reason to plan such
difficult, perilous acts?  The history of political
terrorism includes most groups declaring their motives
in public and seeking publicity, take, for example the
counter culture group The Weathermen Underground. They
used well timed, small bombs, and exploded them
primarily in U.S. federal facilities when there would
be no human live lost (like at 2 A.M.) and they always
followed a scheme of obtaining publicity for the event
through media organizations a day or two later.  They
always protested specific U.S. government actions such
as the National Guards murdering of Kent State
University students for their protest of the Cambodian
invasion (1971) and other similar events.  These
groups have historically acted upon specific timing,
specific events and specific motives and planned
disclosures.  The 9-11 scene had no such follow
through and this naturally made the federal
government's assumption that radical Arab forces were
responsible, difficult to endure and believe.  Far
more questions began to surface among many
researchers, among these problems which the U.S.
government did not adequately address were the
following issues:

SMALL NUMBER HUMAN DEAD  Why did the assaulters NOT
inflict far more damage to life and limb by hitting
the WTC's a few hours later in the day thereby killing
upwards of 50,000 people which was the usual full
population of the two towers?  Only about 2,800 died
in the incident because the tower employees did not
usually arrive until after 10 P.M. and because the
planes hit high, not effecting those below, as well as
the fact that many were evacuated after the planes hit
the buildings.  Why was it that the planes hit at a
time at which the investment firms in the upper
offices had their usual full contingent of workers in
the offices?  These workers were probably the only
workers in the building who had to be at work by 8 -
8:30 A.M. to prepare for the opening of the New York
City stock and bond markets at 9:30 A.M. The planes
hit in perfect timing to catch these workers in both
World Trade Center towers.  The rest of the building
was nearly empty, how convenient.  It was as if
someone was intentionally trying to miss the
population flow there for good reason.  But, it also
seemed possible that someone was intentionally going
for TWO firms, the huge Irish Cantor-Fitzgerald's
(largest bond traders on Wall Street -- rumored to
control trillions of USD) in Tower One, and Fiduciary
Trust (known as the home of celebrity trust funds such
as Springsteen and other rock musicians, they
controlled over 40 billion dollars in investment
funds) in Tower Two.  These firms lost much of their
staffs and their businesses, as a result, now have
changed hands drastically -- Cantor Fitzgerald's
holdings immediately transferred personally to Allen
Greenspan (Jewish stuff) and Fiduciary Trust's
holdings transferred to Franklin Templeton (British
hands?).

TRADE CENTERS WERE NOT SUPPOSED TO FALL   Whomever
executed these events probably did not anticipate the
wholesale collapse of these buildings or they probably
would have aimed far lower on the totem pole.  To hit
the buildings at only 15% of the building itself, the
smallest top portion spelled out the fact that the
perpetrators were not trying to overturn them.  No one
watching these events could have imagined that the
entire buildings would cave in, in fact, no body did.
The planners anticipated only of the loss of the tops
of the towers and the loss of the flights above the
plane's hits.  What this means is that far more
important people may have been involved in planning
these events, because they figured they could get away
with lesser damage, and that these events, which were
supposed to be small as war games go, had a far larger
purpose which played out later and made the risk of
damage worth taking.

TIMING OF EVENTS   What about the disaster's timing?
Why did these acts occur just as the stock market had
nose dived for a good six weeks, loosing about 50% of
its height and strength right before the 9/11
disaster?  Why did the perpetrators use a coded day "
9/11" as their target date?  Contrary to reports that
international terrorists time things to symbolism
according to media reports stated by U.S. government
sources, their examples did not ring true, no Arab
terrorist scenes (like suicide bomber people) measure
up to this sort of coding.  What does ring true is
that the U.S. government has used very clever coding
for political/social military operations before.
Project MK-Ultra, Blue Bird, Paperclip, Artichoke,
etc. stand as 1960s - 70s testaments to the U.S.
government's use of symbolism in military operations
and intelligence maneuvers.  Thus, if there exists a
so-called organized "terrorist system" it has been
activated in response to other world events, not to
some unknown or unstated ephemeral "code system."  The
use of coded systems are more government procedures,
not usually a part of terrorist group scenes.

PLANES PENETRATION   What about the aim of the planes
into the buildings?  The offices in the top areas of
the World Trade Center towers were the most expensive
rental real estate in the U.S., a testament to the
success and lucrative nature of the investment
businesses who occupied the space.  How difficult was
it to land a plane for the reported novice Arab
pilots, perfectly into the World Trade Center so as to
effect only these fully occupied spaces of WTC north
above the 92nd floor of Cantor Fitzgerald and above
floors 87 to 93 in WTC south, Fiduciary Trust?
Interesting how the second pilot landed lower into WTC
2 than the first pilot.  These hits seemed perfectly
positioned for these two businesses only.  And the
same is true for the Pentagon plane, it hit the
janitor closets of the Pentagon evidently, setting
aflame their store piles of toilet paper.  Not even
one general's office was destroyed, not even a
colonel's office, there was apparently not one
significant computer interrupted.  According to
videotapes, the DC fire engines responded perfectly
too, hardly anyone else appeared to watch these fires
in Washington, DC.  The plane seemed to aim perfectly
into the building, at an angle downward, into a nearly
empty octagon shell, as if to make sure that no other
part of the Pentagon was harmed.  All three plane hits
appeared to be perfectly targeted into these buildings
by experienced, professional pilots, possibly
paramilitary, former air force pilots.  This did not
seem to be the work of novice Arab pilots.  The U.S.'s
government response to this being planned on "auto
pilot" does not add up either.  The flight patterns
and the exact height of these hits had to be manually
steered.  Bush stated on television that the
"renegade" plane which downed in Pennsylvania was
reported being hotly chased by a coterie of three AF
fighter jets who had just heard about the news of the
plane hitting the Pentagon.  The government did not
release any information about this plane for days,
until it had its story straight.

ABOUT THE DOWNING OF THE PENNSYLVANIA PLANE  Pres Bush
almost apologized out loud on television when asked
about this plane's downing.  Then he quickly moved
into a different mode and said he did not have
information about it.  It was known that this plane
was followed for some time by three agitated Air Force
fighter planes in hot pursuit.  It's plunge may well
have been the result of the AF fighter planes'
assaults, and their gun hits.  The government in that
case, no doubt, did not conduct a thorough
investigation.  I have never heard of any thorough
investigation into the remains of that plane.

AUDIO TAPES QUESTIONABLE  The eye witnesses accounts
and tape recordings were sparse and questionable.
Audio recordings can be easily invented, taped from
any cell phone to another and the federal government
took their time in releasing these to the media.  The
one convincing information from the American airlines
ground controller was not even a tape recording but a
bunch of notes written hastily on a small piece of
paper.  The fact that audio recording was not made is
inconsistent with airline's guidelines, so what
happened to it?  It is interesting that President Bush
was out-of-town this day, supposedly visiting school
children in the south.

VIDEOTAPES UNANTICIPATED AND ODDLY FILMED  Consider
yet another inconsistency - when 9-11 occurred at
least a half dozen, possibly more, videotapes suddenly
appeared on Manhattan television from eye witnesses in
the downtown WTC area, showing the scene from several
different angles.  These were coming out of the
woodwork in fact and none of the owners of the film
were interviewed on Manhattan television that I saw,
nor were their names released to the public on
television.  All the people who taped these sequences
seemed to know to refuse to be mentioned by television
staff.  None of these tapes had the tapers' audio
expressions of shock on them, none of them were turned
off when the planes hit the buildings as a normal
person filming these events in shock would probably
do.  None of these filmers stopped filming...even for
an hour or two.  There was even one film which was
shot from an expensive building in Jersey City, NJ,
all the way across the bay past the Statue of Liberty
in New York Harbor, which filmed the entire WTC fiasco
and plane hits to the buildings.  This showed up on
local New York television stations even.  Consider the
timing of these tapes between 8:45 - 10:15 A.M.  New
York residents do not use videotaping equipment often
anyway but at this time in the morning they are
traveling to work, not found taping film.  Even
tourists do not flood the city at this time of the
morning watching the subways unload, they are sleeping
off their good time last night in a motel.  It is
common place in the later afternoon and early evening
to see tourists engaged in these activities at but not
this time in the morning.  And what about this sudden
arrival of the "French filming crew" who had
permission to videotape the fire department nearest to
the World Trade Center's daily events as part of a
documentary film.  They arrived a few days before the
disaster.  Who would want to watch the daily events of
a New York fire department anyway...these are not
usually very interesting.  How did the French crew
time their work to coincide with this disaster?  Was
the same paparazzi who taped Princess Di's car
accident in Paris?   How did these people show up,
what was behind them, how did they seemingly know this
was about to happen?  Who were these people who showed
up so perfectly timed to make this film?  Who fronted
them?  Possibly some FBI-sponsored Hannibal Letcher
team, former Americans, who had the insider scoop on
these events occurring.  Perhaps they learned about
this through the insider paramilitary connections in
Canada and the info trickled through channels.


THEORIES OF GOVERNMENT CONSPIRACY  Consider that
possibility that the motive was not terrorism but
financial and then consider what bootie was dealt out
to whom.  These are the facts:  1) Cantor Fitzgerald's
entire bond trading operation, said to be the largest
bond fund in the world, rumored to be $100 trillion
U.S.D., was transferred to directly Alan Greenspan's
custody (skimming off of funds this large could amount
to literally hundreds of millions of dollars a year,
Cantor Fitzgerald - an Irish firm - was beloved by the
banking community because they were reportedly
trustworthy and honest), 2) Fiduciary Trust's 44
billion in individual investor funds was transferred
to Franklin Templeton's offices, 3) as soon as the war
against Afghanistan began President Bush had Osama Ben
Laden's fortune impounded in banks worldwide and this
was reported to be in excess of $60-80 billion
dollars, 4) untold amounts of cash from Sadam
Hussein's coffers were also impounded as soon as Bush
began his invasions into Iraq.  If Bush and the U.S..
government have taken over these funds then the war in
the Middle East surely paid for itself and with the
bond market thrown in for good measure, it was the
largest heist of cash ever pocketed by a government.
Finding out exactly what has happened to these funds
is probably not easy to do as these figures will not
be shared with media sources anytime soon least they
cause or create public problems.  If stealing all this
money wasn't the true reason behind the 9/11 disasters
then other political reasons need to be considered.


As to how the U.S. government might have staged these
events, the following information should be
considered.  Perhaps the real pilots were professional
paramilitary pilots who took these high paying U.S.
government FBI contracts, perhaps out-of-state
(Canadian, Australian or European) paramilitary
groups.  The point was to support the growing
international political-economic platform of
Marxist-Communistic Pagan cult rule.  Further,
Republicans possibly planned the events both to take
over the huge financial empire of Iraq and of Irish
Catholic funds.  Oil was not the goal, but to
influence or jettison, increase U.S. prices and
production might have been.  But that was small
potatoes compared to the bank heists, which may have
been the bottom line.  Jews appeared to move in to
take over Christian-controlled trillion dollar funds
in the aftermath of 9-11, and this must be considered
as a possible motive.  The Pentagon plane may have
been planned as a way and means to afford Bush instant
access to the war machine via "Executive Privilege"
laws of the Constitution, circumventing the usual
requirement to gain Congressional approval.  Recall
disappearance of Jimmy Hoffa, teamsters union boss in
Detroit in 1972, he guarded the gargantuan AFL-CIO
funds. Detroit is known for having huge financial
pots, AFL-CIO insurance and retirement funds for
example.   Those in charge of huge financial reserves
can find themselves in hot water when others swoop in
to take over, these positions are tenuous, hard to
survive.  It is easy to get away with large fund
skimming and many want to have control of these
reserves.

What should the 9-11 Commission investigated, in light
of the fact that the U.S. government may have played a
role in creating this disaster?  The investigation
should have been a lot more basic, including testimony
from selected people at the site with special
knowledge and some family members who had insider
information regarding the workings of those who
perished in businesses there.  Phone call content and
statements from those in the tower to family members
should have been public and considered as evidence.
The following people should have been interviewed at
length by the panel (and they were not) and about the
topics recommended below:

1)  VIDEOTAPE FILMSTERS  All the videotapers should
have been forced to give testimony -- especially and
including the amateur French video team who "suddenly"
appeared at the New York City Firehouse nearest the
World Trade Centers just a few days before the
disaster occurred to record "a day in the life of NYC
Firemen."  These people's names, addresses,
affiliations, races, professions, and reasons for
filming the World Trade Center Towers that day should
be recorded.  Let us see what they look like at the
hearings.  They needed to answer questions about why
their names were never disclosed on television (did
someone tell them not to do that?) and why was the
sound to the video tapes consistently erased, why did
they not STOP filming when the planes hit the
buildings, as most in shock people would normally do,
why did they not scream out on the audiotapes, the
only sounds were the sounds of people in the streets,
but no loud shouts or sounds from filmmakers
themselves....why?  Why was there a videotape made
from as afar away as Jersey City, NJ, just as the
planes hit the towers, and again, no audio sound from
it?  There were an amazing number of videotapes at a
time in the morning at which no one is usually doing
this sort of activity...about 5-7 of them.  Perhaps
more were shown on local television stations.  All of
this is odd.

2) WORLD TRADE CENTER PERSONNEL  Interviews should
have included maintenance staff and every-day staff,
those who might had noticed odd situations or people
and descriptions in the weeks before the disasters.
Probably the assault team had cased the joint, talked
to people, asked questions about particular activities
of particular businesses in the Towers.  The
assaulters had prior knowledge of the workings of the
Towers is the assumption and the investigation should
have followed to find further information and leads.

3)  AUDIOTAPE WITNESSES  Those that provided
audiotapes should have been thoroughly investigated.
Questions such as why the American Airlines employee
had to record hand written notes about those hijacking
the Pennsylvania plane instead of having had that
automatically recorded on audio tape, and why so many
of the other tapes were so incoherent, etc.  Why
weren't there more tapes, more witness reports, etc.?
Why weren't these witnesses more on television and
included in the investigations far more?

4)  NOT BELIEVING THE US GOVERNMENT'S ACCOUNT  The
investigation should have taken a far more open
approach to its proceedings, considering the fact that
the Bush Executive Office and FBI may have been
involved in this disaster and a large cover-up, rather
than accepting at point blank nearly everything Bush
and his group said.  Even the Warren Commission
interviewed main witnesses at length including Marina
Oswald, this is something the 9-11 Commission did not
do.  Relatives of the Arab men accused of the 9-11
plane hits should have been included in Commission
testimony and questions such as where were these men
in the days-weeks before the incident, what did they
say about what they were doing, how did they act?
What happened the morning of the 9-11 disasters, where
were these men, who were they with, etc.?  How long in
advance did they have air flight tickets?
Conversations, people, who, what, where?  George
Bush's investigation is simply that, HIS
investigation, not an event handled in any prudent,
relevant, judicious, Constitutional manner. So what
was Bush's involvement in this anyway, since his reign
has served to ignore, hinder, cover-up whatever
witness reports exist.

There may be just cause to consider that a Golden Dawn
Cult faction headed up by FBI, Marxist Jews and
British were the counterpoints to these horrific
events -- especially the loss of hundreds of highly
educated, honest Irish men and women at Cantor
Fitzgerald in the 9-11 disaster.  They were working in
that building on that floor because they were
considered the finest financial wizards in the world,
and the most trustworthy.  Arab "terrorists" may not
have been involved at all in this disaster, it may
have been purely a world bank heist and a small
re-enactment of the crucifixion of Irish Christ(s)?
The motives were greed (to own the largest bond and
funds markets), to eliminate real and honest
competition (Irish-Christian bond traders), and to
take over enemy's land bases and resources (oil), in
this case the Jews greatest enemies, the richest,
strongest Arab states.

A. Boyer

1999 - 2004  c  MFHR.ORG



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to