-Caveat Lector-
Sno0wl wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>On 8 Feb 99, , Source wrote:
>
>> Yes but dear SnoOwl, Christianity (and all religions for that matter)
have
>> to be the biggest conspiracy ever. That IS relevent to this list.
>
>Yes, but dear Richard, we've already been there, done thatan
-Caveat Lector-
On 8 Feb 99, , Source wrote:
> Yes but dear SnoOwl, Christianity (and all religions for that matter) have
> to be the biggest conspiracy ever. That IS relevent to this list.
Yes, but dear Richard, we've already been there, done thatand it was a total waste
of time for all c
MAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 08, 1999 3:51 AM
> To: Stopforth, Jamie; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [CTRL] AOL Conspiracy?
>
> On 8 Feb 99, , Stopforth, wrote:
>
> > You're assuming we're wrong here... If you would like a rational
> argument
>
egasus Mail for Windows (v3.01a)
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 09:50:57 +
>Reply-To: Conspiracy Theory Research List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sender: Conspiracy Theory Research List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>From: Sno0wl <[E
-Caveat Lector-
On 8 Feb 99, , Stopforth, wrote:
> You're assuming we're wrong here... If you would like a rational argument
> email me with your thoughts on Christianity, I'd be glad to discuss it with
> you, or anyone.
>
> On a side note here, have you ever asked why it is we believe in t
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 2/8/99 8:54:09 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< >>>Invariably when these people
were confronted with contradictory information regarding their beliefs they
just resorted to "God said" and declared themselves the winner and everyone
els
-Caveat Lector-
>>>Invariably when these people
were confronted with contradictory information regarding their beliefs they
just resorted to "God said" and declared themselves the winner and everyone
else doomed. THUS proselytizing (and not just in religious areas either) is
not permitted BECAU
-Caveat Lector-
I don't like or appreciate the way FWP is going about this
BUT...could he have a point?
Franklin Wayne Poley wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>On Sun, 7 Feb 1999, Bob Stokes wrote:
>
>> Just from looking at his CC list (Henry Ayre and 13Teaxan), it is
appaent
>> he is in with
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 2/7/99 12:56:10 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Is it not possible to ignore the so-called "disrupters"?
The question is obvious rhetorical. Of course they can be ignored. If they
are
ignored, they will eventually go away. This is the
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 2/7/99 12:53:55 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Franklin,
I have been removed from 2 lists because my views were considered
"disruptive".
This word disruptive is a catch-all term that can mean whatever a list owner
wants
it to mean.
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 2/7/99 11:24:04 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
<< <>
FWP , You have got your wish. Bye-bye.
Om
K
>>
FWP has perpetrated the best case of self fulfilling prophecy I have ever
seen. First be rude and idiotic to such an extent that y
-Caveat Lector-
Laura wrote:
Kris - Citations may not be needed, but must we be abused by such as
this person?
==
AS:
It seems that he could fulfill his own prophecy by being so abrasive
that he IS removed and then he can go abo
-Caveat Lector-
I can empathize with this statement! Still as far as CTRL is concerned, we are not
a debate list.. Overall, we throw out ideas and news and wait to see if someone else
is capable of finding or if they know something that disproves it.
To give you an idea - recently a box of
-Caveat Lector-
Is it not possible to ignore the so-called "disrupters"?
The question is obvious rhetorical. Of course they can be ignored. If they are
ignored, they will eventually go away. This is the better solution.
Eric
Teo One Thousand wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> In a message dated 2/6
-Caveat Lector-
Franklin,
I have been removed from 2 lists because my views were considered "disruptive".
This word disruptive is a catch-all term that can mean whatever a list owner wants
it to mean.
I think you are quite right in your appraisal of the danger here.
Eric
Franklin Wayne Poley wr
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 2/6/99 10:23:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
<>
FWP , You have got your wish. Bye-bye.
Om
K
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substancenot soapboxing!
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 2/7/99 1:23:46 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
<< I have your
> > whole made-in-america scam figured out so you can just FUCK OFF for all I
> > care!
> > FWP. >>
Hey I guess we can all pack it in now since he has uncovered our "made-in
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 2/7/99 12:30:08 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Nay, O' Celestial Bunghole of one thousand cybernightmares. I have your
whole made-in-america scam figured out so you can just FUCK OFF for all I
care!
FWP.
>>
Thanks for the well rea
-Caveat Lector-
On Sun, 7 Feb 1999, Bob Stokes wrote:
> Just from looking at his CC list (Henry Ayre and 13Teaxan), it is appaent
> he is in with the same crowd that got bounced about a year ago for their
> praise of Hitler etc. etc. Like I really care about some nut in BC. Stay in
> Can
-Caveat Lector-
> > > Nay, O' Celestial Bunghole of one thousand cybernightmares. I have your
> > > whole made-in-america scam figured out so you can just FUCK OFF for all I
> > > care!
> > > FWP.
> >
> > FWP, -- AOL does not seem to have to censer us. We seem to be able to see, the
> > peopl
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 99-02-07 01:12:00 EST, you write:
<< Nay, O' Celestial Bunghole of one thousand cybernightmares. I have your
> whole made-in-america scam figured out so you can just FUCK OFF for all I
> care!
> FWP >>
Just from looking at his CC list (Henry Ayre and
-Caveat Lector-
On Sun, 7 Feb 1999, 1lls0081 wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> Franklin Wayne Poley wrote:
>
> > -Caveat Lector-
> >
> > On Sun, 7 Feb 1999, Teo One Thousand wrote:
> >
> > > In a message dated 2/6/99 11:57:22 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > >
> > > <<
-Caveat Lector-
Franklin Wayne Poley wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> On Sun, 7 Feb 1999, Teo One Thousand wrote:
>
> > In a message dated 2/6/99 11:57:22 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > << You already do! If my previous statement re AOL "eliminating" dissidents
> >
-Caveat Lector-
On Sun, 7 Feb 1999, Teo One Thousand wrote:
> In a message dated 2/6/99 11:57:22 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> << You already do! If my previous statement re AOL "eliminating" dissidents
> is true (a concept unknown to The American) then this list CO
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 2/6/99 11:57:22 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< You already do! If my previous statement re AOL "eliminating" dissidents
is true (a concept unknown to The American) then this list COULD NOT EXIST
without AOL approval. You must be an Or
-Caveat Lector-
On Sat, 6 Feb 1999, Teo One Thousand wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> In a message dated 2/6/99 5:46:33 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>
> << Just wondering. Is AOL's reputation for discontinuing ISP service to free
> speakers borne up by facts? If so, is th
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 2/6/99 5:46:33 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
<< Just wondering. Is AOL's reputation for discontinuing ISP service to free
speakers borne up by facts? If so, is this list part of an AOL conspiracy
to further tighten the noose, ISP-wise,
-Caveat Lector-
Just wondering. Is AOL's reputation for discontinuing ISP service to free
speakers borne up by facts? If so, is this list part of an AOL conspiracy
to further tighten the noose, ISP-wise, on holocaust deniers and others
expressing opinions which are taboo in Fascist America?
FWP.
28 matches
Mail list logo
