-Caveat Lector- http://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/17/nyregion/17THRE.html May 17, 2001 Crackdown on Threats in Schools Fails a Test By KATE ZERNIKE MANALAPAN, N.J., May 15 — Just weeks after the school shootings in March in Santee, Calif., the county prosecutor here met with local school superintendents and emphasized the need for zero tolerance. There is no gray area, he told them. Any student who makes a threat, even in jest, must be disciplined. The schools obeyed, fast and furiously. A 10-year-old girl who whimpered, "I could kill her!" after she wet her pants because a teacher had refused to let her go to the bathroom was suspended for three days. A 10-year- old who muttered, "I oughtta murder his face!" when someone left his desk in disarray got the same punishment. The suspensions — at least 50 in the last six weeks, compared with almost none last year — were meted out mostly to children in kindergarten to third grade, in many cases for repeating expressions they had heard their parents use at home. All those suspended, including kindergartners, now have police files in their names. Parents reacted to the suspensions with outrage, hiring lawyers to defend their children. Confronted by the anger, the Manalapan-Englishtown school board said tonight that it would stop the automatic suspensions and return decisions about discipline to teachers and principals. Board members said they would vote next week to review the police file for every suspended child and expunge any records if the punishment seemed unfair. A policy that looked good on paper, they said, had not worked well in practice. "I don't think anybody envisioned this — the prosecutor's office, the superintendent, the principals," said James Mumolie, the school board president. What happened in this solidly middle-class town shows some of the pitfalls of a post-Columbine era, when no officials want to be caught without the strictest of policies should a shooting occur at their school, and when parents, including many in Manalapan, demand toughness. Now the same parents complain that schools are going so far as to trample on civil rights. "They're suspending babies, babies, for saying things they hear everywhere they go," said Wanda Minken, a parent of three elementary school students in Manalapan who said her children have not been suspended, "yet." "It's McCarthyism, that's what this is," Mrs. Minken said. "These are kids who've never even had lunch detention." About 90 percent of school systems nationwide have what they call zero- tolerance policies for violence or threats, according to the United States Department of Education. Few have enforced them as strictly as Manalapan, but more and more are learning the lesson that Manalapan has. In February, the American Bar Association passed a resolution opposing zero-tolerance policies, saying they have "redefined students as criminals." Among the harsher cases, they cited a Louisiana boy who was suspended for two days after warning his peers in the lunch line not to eat all the potatoes or "I'm gonna get you!" The school board in West Windsor, N.J., let up on its zero- tolerance policy last fall after a furor over the suspension of a 9-year-old boy who had threatened to shoot a wad of paper with a rubber band. Similarly, the federal Department of Education's Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools warns against the policies and is planning to release a new handbook, written with the Secret Service, on how to evaluate threats better. Those urging less strictness point out that school violence is down by 30 percent in the last decade, that students are still more likely to be hit by lightning than to be killed in school. Studies have shown that zero-tolerance policies suspend disproportionate numbers of black students. Zero tolerance was originally applied to gun possession when President Bill Clinton signed the Gun Free Schools Act in 1994. But many schools adopted the same stance toward threats, especially after a student fatally shot 2 other students and injured 13 at Santana High School in Santee in March, an incident that sparked a spate of copycat shootings and threats nationwide. Manalapan, a suburb of tidy subdivisions and large lawns an hour's drive south of New York City, is the kind of town, parents say, where sport utility vehicles and minivans clog the streets on parent-teacher conference nights. Last year, parents at the elementary schools pressed the school board to make sure no intruders entered the buildings, which prompted the schools to require that visitors be buzzed in. So the letter that went home in April did not surprise them. "The decision on whether or not to report a threat does not belong to the school official," said the letter, which was signed by the superintendents of the seven elementary school districts that feed into the Freehold Regional High School District as well the Freehold superintendent. "He/ she must report all threats to the police, who, in turn, must notify the prosecutor's office," the note said. "Consequences may result in fines, jail time, or other penalties." No incidents of violence were reported last year, said Robert Weiner, the assistant superintendent, nor could anyone remember any. "In our world today, that's really quite amazing," he said. "It's a pretty harmless type of place. But then you look at a place like Columbine — who would expect this to happen there? A Columbine isn't that dissimilar to a Manalapan. The parents react to that, the schools react to the parents." Michael Seminerio was among those parents who initially supported the policy. Last year, he and his wife went to the police after the school, they said, refused to discipline a boy who had threatened their son, then 8. His support turned to outrage when his son was suspended this month and a letter was put in a police file after the boy, now 9, joked with other boys about selling tickets to kill a girl. It was, his father admitted, "a bonehead move," but not reason for a police record. "Zero tolerance has a purpose, a legitimate purpose, but they're abusing it right now," he said. "They're handing it out like candy. I understand where they're coming from, I understand the kids need to be taught a lesson, but there's got to be a better way." Last week, the girl whom his son threatened was suspended herself for threatening to blow up someone's house. And in the uproar, fifth graders have told one another that the police will invade and search their homes if they make threats. Discipline became so erratic that a 12-year-old shoved during a touch football game was suspended for blurting out, "I'll kill you!" but the classmate who shoved him was not. The parents objected to police questioning of their children without them or a lawyer present. And they said the suspensions sent the wrong message. Lisa Dimino, whose 12-year-old son was the student shoved in the touch football game, said her son asked her whether he would have been suspended if he had simply shoved back. "I don't want my child touching another child," she told the school board. "I'm embarrassed to say I live in Manalapan. I'm embarrassed about what we are teaching these children." Her husband, Larry, added, "It can create more anger and hostility if the children have the feeling that they have been wrongly accused." William Modzeleski, director of the federal Office of Safe and Drug- Free Schools, agreed, saying that any policies must be within a context of teaching about violence prevention. "Zero-tolerance policies in and of themselves aren't inherently bad," he said. "But they have to be balanced with common sense." In Manalapan, the school board members say they are trying to do just that. But common sense is not entirely comforting, not in a world where a first grader kills a classmate. "No one has found the happy medium," said Mr. Mumolie, the board president. "I think what's happening right now is that society is looking at what's happened to all these kids across the country and saying, `What went wrong?' And we're deciding that maybe we can't trust anybody. Isn't that a terrible thing to say?" <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
