-Caveat Lector-

from:alt.conspiracy
As, always, Caveat Lector
Om
K
-----
Click Here: <A HREF="aol://5863:126/alt.conspiracy:582471">CIA's Dulles And
Christmas Cheer</A>
-----
Subject: CIA's Dulles And Christmas Cheer
From: Ralph McGehee <A HREF="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
Date: Wed, 22 December 1999 10:32 AM EST
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------A537A1F01703A86BE3EA8B07
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


--------------A537A1F01703A86BE3EA8B07
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; name="dulles"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="dulles"

            Allen Dulles and More Christmas Cheer

   An email responding to my post of "Be Of Good Cheer," herewith and
edited makes a valid point that lower level analysts frequently get
it right -- but policymakers distort their product to support the
operational role of the CIA, vis:

> Reminds me of Allen Dulles' literary claims of espionage success. The
> files showed what a disaster he was, with most of his OSS reports
> discarded as worthless. Still, there is more than a grain of truth in the
> lower-ranking analysts claims to have gotten it right.  The real question
> is what was the CIA's policy when it hit the President's desk? Two very
> different stories. There is no great disinformation conspiracy,
> just bureaucrats rewriting analysts reports to fit the political theory of
> their bosses....

(Identifying data deleted by R.McGehee)

Subject: Re: Be of Good Cheer

I cannot comment on Dulles' OSS claims as I have avoided OSS history out
of inability to handle the sheer mass of info available.  Your
views re lower level analysts getting it right probably have much truth.
As I discovered in my "Vietnam days" policy dictated intelligence with
William Colby and others ensuring that no info challenging our policy
saw the light of day. However, the rejection of reality started from
the very first days from just after WWII and prior to the creation
of CIA.

Later even Sam Adams, the number one analyst/protestor on Vietnam, had
little knowledge about the Communists "People's War," written about
ad naseum by Vo Nguyen Giap, Ho Chi Minh and even Mao Tse tung.

Agency analysts do not use open source data/datum -- and herewith lies
one major cause of its egregiously terrible intelligence. Another is
the multi-leveled bureaucratic structure of the CIA that authorizes
politicized bureaucrats at all levels to hack away at raw intelligence
until it supports policy.

In my last few years in the CIA as a skeptic I saw that distoring
intelligence to support policy was a universal truism. This can be
deducted particularly from Mel Goodwin's experience re CIA intelligence
on the Soviet Union. William Casey was a total practicioner of this
phenomenon.

Unfortunately efforts to protect the CIA's past dominate today.
My concern is how an intelligence agency can ever be effective against
terrorism, WMD, drugs, etc., when it cannot get it right over such
long term and huge requirements as the USSR and Vietnam; and, when
policy writes intelligence.

For a successful career in the CIA one must accept that the Emperor
wears gorgeous robes -- stating the obvious kills the messenger.

To become an intelligence Agency the CIA must be re-structured -- but Tenet
apparently does not see this -- or does not know this -- or does not care
-- or more likely, wants the CIA to enforce policy not write accurate
intelligence.

Ralph McGehee
<A HREF="http://come.to/CIABASE">http://come.to/CIABASE</A>


--------------A537A1F01703A86BE3EA8B07--
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
All My Relations.
Omnia Bona Bonis,
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to