-Caveat Lector-

http://www.webcom.com/ctka/pr300-mkultra.html

>From the March-April 2000 issue (Vol. 7 No. 3)

Mind-Control Part 1:
Canadian and U.S. Survivors Seek Justice
"Curiously, often a classic manifestation of people who are afflicted with certain 
psychotic disorders is the irrational fear that the CIA and FBI is conspiring to harm 
them. In this case, the CIA involvement is real and the covert nature of the 
involvement is not contested."

Orlikow v. United States (1988)1

By Arlene Tyner
Gripping survivor-centered accounts of medical atrocities committed by CIA-funded 
mind-control (MC) researchers during the Cold War are rarely found in traditional U.S. 
media.2  Neither are they the subject of emotionally powerful TV docu-dramas commonly 
produced for broadcast and cable television. In January 1998, the Canadian 
Broadcasting System (CBC) courageously filled this void, although the blackout on 
government MC history is near-total in the U.S.

The Sleep Room, a gut-wrenching four-hour miniseries, depicts the true story of Dr. 
Ewen Cameron’s secret MKULTRA brainwashing experiments carried out in the late 50s and 
early 60s at Allan Memorial Institute in Montreal. Widespread publicity accompanying 
this major TV event has empowered many other Canadian survivors of nonconsensual 
brainwashing experiments in hospitals and prisons to come forward and seek justice in 
the courts.3

In Part I of the miniseries, gifted actors dramatize how vulnerable, trusting hospital 
patients were transformed into virtual vegetables through doses of "electroconvulsive 
therapy" 30-40 times more powerful than usual, sensory deprivation, hallucinogenic and 
paralytic drugs, and other psychological and physical tortures. Part II grippingly 
depicts the successful eight-year U.S. lawsuit of nine survivors, who overcame fear to 
confront the humiliations and frustrating delay tactics of the CIA lawyers. Joseph L. 
Rauh, Jr., a legendary Washington civil rights attorney, and his partner James C. 
Turner eventually prevailed for their clients. In 1988, the U.S. "national security" 
establishment agreed to an out-of-court settlement of $750,000.4

This extraordinary CBC drama was based on Anne Collins’ prize-winning 1989 book In the 
Sleep Room: The Story of CIA Brainwashing Experiments in Canada. Collins exposed 
Cameron’s 1930s-1940s history of ethically unsupportable experiments on psychiatric 
patients. Many of the people methodically abused by Cameron had entered the Institute 
suffering only from mild disorders such as anxiety and post-partum depression. By the 
time they were released from the Sleep Room torture chamber, many had decades of 
memory completely wiped out. Some did not remember their children and even had to 
relearn bladder and bowel control.

A U.S. citizen since 1941, the Scottish-born Cameron resided in Albany, New York, from 
which he commuted to Montreal each week. Before taking on the directorship at Allan 
Memorial, which is associated with McGill University, Cameron was chair of psychiatry 
and neurology at a medical school in Albany. He worked closely with Alan Gregg, 
medical-sciences director of the Rockefeller Foundation, which provided grants to 
found the Institute in 1943.5  As director from 1943 to 1964, Cameron achieved a 
worldwide reputation, serving as the first chair of the World Psychiatric Association, 
as well as president of the American and Canadian psychiatric associations.

In one barely watchable scene of institutional cruelty, Cameron is filmed delivering a 
speech to psychiatrists about his successes in "curing" mental illness. As he drones 
on, the camera switches to scenes of terrified resisting patients being captured and 
restrained by doctors and nurses, forcibly being dosed with drugs and high-voltage 
electroshock, then put to sleep for weeks at a time in a room full of beds equipped 
with tape recorders and football helmets.

Winner in 1998 of the Academy of Canadian Cinema and Television’s Gemini Awards in 
best picture and other categories, The Sleep Room touched the raw nerves of Canadian 
citizens. Not only did they learn their government had been the CIA’s junior consort 
during the Cold War against Communism, they also discovered it had secretly granted 
$500,000 to fund the Allan Memorial experiments. The CIA had only given Cameron 
$69,000 from 1957 to 1964. As the lawsuit dragged on through the Reagan presidency, 
Rauh was forced to expose the Canadian government’s role in helping the CIA derail the 
lawsuit, in complete disregard for pain and lifelong suffering of its own citizens.6  
In 1992 the Canadian government coughed up $100,000 for 76 Cameron victims. To date 
127 of his patients have come forward with their horror stories to seek compensation.

CIA psychologist John Gittinger initiated contact with Cameron after reading his 
article on "Psychic Driving" in the January 1956 American Journal of Psychiatry. 
Gittinger persuaded Cameron to apply to the Society for the Investigation of Human 
Ecology, a CIA front set up in 1955 to disburse funding for what became a huge MKULTRA 
network in the U.S., Canada and overseas (in collaboration with branches of the U.S. 
Armed Forces). The Human Ecology Fund (its name was changed in 1961) operated secretly 
out of Cornell University in New York City.

Cameron’s brainwashing grant application proposed to "depattern" patient behavior 
through the use of mega-doses of electroshock, to reprogram patients’ minds with 
repetitious verbal messages 16 hours a day for six or seven days, during which time 
the patient would be kept in partial sensory deprivation. Cameron called this 
technique "psychic driving." Brainwashing would be completed by subjecting patients to 
drug-enforced continuous sleep, sometimes as long as weeks or even months.7

The Sleep Room portrays two generations of CIA personnel as equally deadly, i.e., the 
1950s Human Ecology bureaucrats who approved the funding for what were considered 
"terminal" experiments on non-U.S. nationals, and the 1980s CIA legal lords who 
maneuvered on grounds of "national security" to withhold evidence of the agency’s 
negligence and failure to adhere to the Nuremberg Code. The callousness of the CIA 
scientists is aptly captured in this fictitious dialog, where the scientists are 
discussing whether to fund Cameron’s proposal:

#1: He’s going to fry his patients. I can tell you that.

#2: Well, we won’t worry about the patients. That’s his problem. I just want to know 
if he can brainwash them.

#1: He just might, you know. He’s right about the memory loss with a shock like that. 
You couldn’t do that to volunteers.

#2: Well, should we give him the money?

#1: What have we got to lose? It’s not like he’s doing it to Americans.

While the tone is apt, the misleading impression that neither the CIA nor Cameron were 
experimenting on U.S. citizens (witting or unwitting) during this era is the 
miniseries’ biggest flaw. According to the March 15, 1995 testimony of Claudia Mullen 
before the President’s Advisory Commission on Human Radiation Experiments (ACHRE), 
Ewen Cameron was the high-voltage expert in a secret team of CIA doctor-brainwashers. 
Mullen and Chris DiNicola Ebner told a visibly shaken group of scientists that 
memory-erasing electroshock, among other horrors, was regularly used on physically 
healthy American children in the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s.8  Unlucky enough to be 
delivered into CIA/military custody by abusive or uncaring parents, children as young 
as eight years old were subjected to trauma-based mind control (MC) programming to 
mold them into "Manchurian Candidate" spies, assassins and sexual blackmailers.9   
ACHRE’s final report documented more than 4000 experiments, and anywhere from 16,000 
to 23,000 unwitting victims!10   The numbers run past 200,000 when if one includes the 
GIs deliberately exposed to radiation from atomic bomb testing.11

During this same era, U.S. psychiatric patients were also victimized. Harold Blauer, a 
patient in the New York Psychiatric Institute, died in 1953 shortly after being 
injected with a highly toxic dose of methyl-diamphetamine (MDA), a derivative of 
mescaline. Blauer had entered the hospital suffering from depression after a divorce. 
He had made progress solely with the talking cure. Blauer did not know that his 
psychiatrist, Paul Hoch, was a CIA consultant secretly under contract with the Army’s 
Edgewood Arsenal chemical/biological warfare lab. This contract was negotiated through 
the New York State Department of Mental Hygiene, which allowed trusting hospital 
patients to be used as part of the Army’s search for "potential chemical warfare 
agents."

The MDA was not administered for any therapeutic reason. Blauer was scheduled to be 
released from the hospital in a few weeks. His objections to the series of injections, 
which were causing him great pain and discomfort, were overridden by manipulative 
hospital personnel. Blauer was threatened before the fourth nonfatal dose that if he 
didn’t give his consent, he would be moved out of the Institute to hospital settings 
that displeased him. The fourth dose caused a violent reaction. The fifth killed him. 
The Army began its cover-up immediately, the sordid details of which are recounted in 
the 1987 court decision awarding the Blauer estate $707,044. The court affixed blame 
for Blauer’s needless death totally on the U.S. government.12

The Blauer case reveals a direct lineage between Nazi research projects and the 
MKULTRA program. Mescaline was tested on concentration camp inmates during the Third 
Reich’s search for a "truth serum."13   These and other Nazi experiments were 
intensively studied by U.S. military scientists in occupied Germany. Under the CIA’s 
Operation Paperclip, 1600 German and Austrian scientists were secretly brought to the 
U.S. Some had worked for I.G. Farben perfecting Zyclon-B gas for the extermination of 
Jews and other doomed prisoners. Many were being investigated for war crimes when they 
were rescued by a government intent on using their knowledge and expertise in the Cold 
War against the Communist Eastern Bloc. Hundreds of chemists and other scientists were 
given jobs at Edgewood Arsenal, which supplied the drugs, chemicals and poisons for 
the CIA’s counterespionage and assassination programs during the Korean and Vietnam 
wars, as well as covert interventions in the affairs of many Third World nations.14

Though the Cold War is over, the U.S. military/CIA bureaucracies still invoke 
"national security" and "plausible deniability" to hide a vast arsenal of 
sophisticated mind-control and psychological warfare technology.15  All of these 
weapons had to be perfected by means of human experimentation. Psychiatrist Colin Ross 
found that many areas of brain research heading in the direction of MC suddenly went 
"black" in the 1960s.16  His long-awaited book, Building the Manchurian Candidate: 
Deliberate Creation of Multiple Personality by Psychiatrists, will soon be published.

A hint about mind-control research first surfaced in the aftermath of the 1963 
assassination of President John F. Kennedy. When J. Edgar Hoover testified before the 
Warren Commission in 1964, he raised the possibility President Kennedy had been killed 
by a programmed assassin dispatched by the Soviet Union. Alarmed, the Commission 
requested the CIA to produce information on Soviet brainwashing. The resultant CIA 
memo (so controversial it wasn’t declassified until 1974) cryptically asserted the 
Soviets did not have any MC techniques or drugs "not available in the West."17  
However, neither Hoover nor the CIA told the Commission that the U.S. had an 
operational program of Manchurian Candidates up and running since World War II!18

The term "brainwashing" was first coined in 1950 by Edward Hunter, a CIA employee 
operating undercover as a journalist, purportedly to explain how American POWs in 
Korea were being coerced into confessing they used biological weapons.19 Newspapers 
played up fears that the Soviets, the Chinese and North Koreans were using a secret 
psychological weapon against allied soldiers. This "brainwashing" scare was a 
successful CIA disinformation strategy used to build support for an unpopular war.20  
It also helped insulate military and university researchers from accountability for 
violating medical ethics and criminal laws.

The prevailing anticommunist hysteria that grew to justify the MKULTRA program and its 
unambiguous violations of the Hippocratic Oath, the Nuremberg Code and many 
international human-rights covenants was aptly summarized in 1954 by former President 
Herbert Hoover:

It is now clear we are facing an implacable enemy whose avowed objective is world 
domination.... There are no rules in such a game. Hitherto accepted norms of human 
conduct do not apply.... If the United States is to survive, long-standing American 
concepts of fair play must be reconsidered... We must learn to subvert, sabotage and 
destroy our enemies by more clever, more sophisticated, more effective methods than 
those used against us.21

The MKULTRA program began with a proposal by Richard Helms, then the CIA’s Assistant 
Deputy Director for Plans, to fund "highly sensitive" research and development using 
chemical/ biological substances to alter human behavior. It was approved by CIA 
Director Allen Dulles on April 13, 1953 and was overseen by chemist Sidney Gottlieb, 
chief of the CIA’s Technical Services Division (TSD). The first MC programs, called 
Bluebird and Artichoke, were subsumed under the MKULTRA umbrella. This program came to 
embrace an octopus-like network with names like MK-Search (1963-1973), MK-Delta and 
MK-Naomi (assassination programs carried out by the Army 1953-1970).22  Between 1953 
and 1963 the TSD operated 149 subprojects in 80 U.S. and Canadian universities and 
medical centers, and three prisons, involving 185 private researchers, 15 foundations 
and numerous pharmaceutical companies.23

In 1973, with the Watergate scandal looming, outgoing CIA Director Helms ordered all 
MKULTRA records destroyed. He testified before the Senate’s Church Committee two years 
later that Gottlieb:

"...came to me and said that he was retiring and I was retiring and he thought it 
would be a good idea if these files were destroyed. And I also believe part of the 
reason for our thinking this was advisable was there had been relationships with 
outsiders in government agencies and other organizations and these would be sensitive 
in this kind of thing but that since the program was over and finished and done with, 
we thought we would just get rid of the files as well, so that anybody who assisted us 
in the past would not be subject to follow-up questions, embarrassment, if you will."24

Fortunately, 8,000 pages of mainly financial data escaped the CIA shredder, and were 
declassified pursuant to a Freedom of Information lawsuit in the 1970s filed by the 
Center for National Security Studies. Though woefully incomplete, these documents 
nevertheless became the bedrock of John Marks’ groundbreaking 1978 book, The Search 
for the "Manchurian Candidate": The CIA and Mind Control.25

All branches of the military sponsored MC research in collaboration with the CIA.26  
Most civilian subjects were unwitting; even CIA employees and Army recruits who 
consented to drug and hypnosis experiments were not properly informed as to their 
dangers. MKULTRA clearly violated the Nuremberg Code requirement that subjects give 
"informed consent" to participate in scientific research: "This means that the person 
involved should have the legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to 
be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of 
force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other form of constraint or coercion." 
This Code was established in 1948 by the same U.S. Military Tribunal that tried 24 
Nazi doctors for deadly experiments on concentration camp inmates. It was binding on 
the U.S. as of February 26, 1953.27

How do we explain the hundreds of thousands of human guinea pigs callously sacrificed 
during the Cold War?28  As Paperclip researcher Linda Hunt concluded, "...we used Nazi 
science to kill our own people."29 Perhaps survivor stories can help us understand 
what went wrong and why our secular democracy allows huge bureaucracies of 
unsupervised, supersecret warriors guided only by the cult-like religion of "national 
security" and the obsessive search for "enemies of the state." The death of communism 
as a military threat has not dented the religious zeal that still inspires the 
military/intelligence establishment.

James Stanley, a career soldier, suffered soul murder as an Army lab rat. He was given 
LSD in 1958 without being warned of its dangers, as were 1000 other "volunteer" 
soldiers. Stanley suffered hallucinations, memory loss, incoherence, and a negative 
personality change. Fits of uncontrollable violence destroyed his family, and 
restricted his ability to earn a living. And he never knew why until 1975, when the 
Army invited him to participate in a follow-up study on "volunteers who participated" 
in LSD testing. In United States vs. Stanley,30   the Supreme Court majority decided 
against Stanley’s claim for damages. However, Justices Brennan, Marshall and O’Connor 
dissented, asserting their belief that the Nuremberg Code’s standard of informed 
consent applies to soldiers as well as civilians. In 1996 James Stanley finally 
wrangled a $400,000 settlement from the government, but no apology for having ruined 
his life.31

Unacknowledged civilian wreckage from unimaginably cruel brainwashing experiments 
continues to bob to the surface from a vast sea of still-classified, cold-war 
experiments. Survivors of ghoulish medical tortures or the families of deceased 
victims are turning up in Canadian and U.S. courtrooms today demanding compensation 
for a lifetime of suffering. Some Canadian plaintiffs appear to have a slight 
advantage over their U.S. cousins, who are severely hampered by the 1973 
Helms/Gottlieb destruction of MKULTRA records. Fortunately for these survivors, paper 
trails are being unearthed in government, hospital and prison archives. The eminently 
freer Canadian press also helps build public support for MC survivors’ lawsuits.32

Gail Kastner, now in her 60s, did not discover Ewen Cameron’s experiments were the 
cause of her "wasted life" until reading a newspaper story in the Montreal Gazette in 
1992. She sued the Canadian government and Montreal’s Royal Victoria Hospital in 1999 
after the government rejected her claim for damages. A "brilliant student whose 
domineering father checked her into the institute for depression," Kastner says that 
Cameron’s electroconvulsive "depatterning" treatments and insulin-induced comas for 
five weeks at a time are responsible for a life of screaming nightmares, recurring 
seizures, loss of memory, and long-term regression to an infantile state. Her husband, 
son and twin sister could not tolerate her bizarre behavior, i.e. "wetting the 
living-room carpet, thumb-sucking, babytalk and wanting to be bottlefed." Abandoned by 
her own family, she was rescued from homelessness by the Jewish Family Service.33

During the era of Cameron’s brainwashing regimens, psychiatrists and psychologists in 
other Canadian institutions were using similar methods to "treat" people haphazardly 
diagnosed with depression, schizophrenia or, in prisons, what was perceived as 
"antisocial" conduct. Dorothy Proctor was a rebellious 17-year-old when she entered 
the Prison for Women in Kingston, Ontario on a three-year term for robbery. Primed 
first with sensory deprivation and electroshock, she was administered LSD in 1961 by a 
prison psychologist, then locked into "The Hole" to endure what for her was "Dante’s 
Inferno."

Proctor, a Native and Black Canadian from Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia, calls this 
"mind rape." She says she was singled out for such "Nazi-style science" because she 
had twice escaped from the prison, bringing unfavorable publicity to the authorities 
there. Proctor asserts that the steady prison diet of LSD and other experimental drugs 
led her down the path to drug addiction for 24 years. After publishing Chameleon: The 
Life of Dorothy Proctor in 1994, this articulate and determined woman launched a 
complaint with the Corrections Service of Canada (CSC), saying she suffered permanent 
brain damage and hallucinations haunting her to the present day.

"I was reduced to a lab rat, a monkey in a cage," she told the Ottawa Citizen 
(7/21/98), which has been covering the Proctor and other Canadian human 
experimentation cases for a number of years. A government inquiry turned up 
documentation (including clinical notes) that Proctor was not the only victim of 
involuntary prison experimentation 1960-1963. At least 23 other women prisoners were 
also used as human guinea pigs. Only four of these women have been found to date. And 
instead of complying with the CSC’s recommendation of an apology and financial 
compensation to Proctor, the Canadian government commissioned an "ethics study" at 
McGill University. Meanwhile Proctor hired lawyer James Newland and filed suit for $5 
million in damages from the Canadian government, George Scott, MD, the prison 
psychiatrist, and Mark Eveson, a psychologist affiliated with Queen’s University.34

While the emotional shock of The Sleep Room still electrified Canadian airways, the 
Ottawa Citizen published an expose drawn from interviews, archives, scientific 
journals and correspondence between doctors and prison officials. It found that 
hundreds of federal prisoners throughout Canada were used for pharmaceutical trials of 
untested drugs, sensory deprivation, and pain and electroshock studies. It uncovered a 
1968 trial during which defendant Christine Bauman claimed that she suffered 
terrifying personality changes after being given LSD in 1961 at the Institute for 
Psychotherapy, not far from Kingston Prison where she had been incarcerated.35  
Furthermore, archival materials released through the Proctor lawsuit indicate that 
some abuses may have begun as early as March 24, 1949, when a new electroshock machine 
arrived at Kingston Penitentiary. Electroshock has a history of being used as 
punishment in Nazi Germany and against Blacks in apartheid South Africa.36

By late 1999, additional Canadian women and men came forward to claim they were used 
in prison and hospital experiments in the 1960s and 1970s. A class-action suit against 
the prison system was filed anonymously by "Jane Doe," a 75-year-old grandmother who 
realized after reading newspaper stories that she was one of the 23 women who were 
given LSD and other terrifying "treatments" without their consent while in prison . 
Her lawsuit charges Scott and Eveson with assault, intentional affliction of mental 
suffering, and negligence. Her access to the Eveson’s clinical notes, released as a 
result of the Proctor suit, helped her recognize what had been done to her 38 years 
ago.37

Less documented, however, are the connections of these prison experiments to U.S. 
mind-control funding sources. Canadian newspaper stories usually include the caveat 
that although prison use of LSD and "shock therapy" coincided with CIA "brainwashing" 
experiments at Allan Memorial Institute, no evidence has been found to link the 
programs. However, Allen Hornblum, author of Acres of Skin: The Human Experiments at 
Holmesburg Prison, said on a 1998 CBC radio show that some of the experiments 
conducted in U.S. prisons during this era were sponsored by the U.S. Army and the CIA. 
And he pointed out that shortly after seven Nazi doctors were hung at Nuremberg for 
horrific experiments on inmates at Bergen Belsen, Auschwitz and Ravensbruk, U.S. 
doctors were injecting plutonium and uranium into unwitting hospital patients.38

Activist Lynne Moss-Sharman does not rule out a hidden connection between the Canadian 
prison experiments and CIA/military brainwashing research. Moss-Sharman is the 
Canadian contact for ACHES-MC (Advocacy Committee for Human Experimentation Survivors 
– Mind Control), and is herself a survivor of brainwashing experimentation during her 
childhood.39  The Canadian military had a close relationship with Edgewood Arsenal 
during the years it funded MC experiments in hospitals and prisons.40

Moss-Sharman has been organizing support for federal prisoner Richard Carlson, who 
filed a civil claim in October 1998. Carlson says his use in covert brainwashing 
experiments from 1968 to 1974 in several Kingston-area prisons caused a lifelong 
psychiatric disability. According to Moss-Sharman, the authorities retaliated against 
Carlson going public about the prison brainwashing experiments. They unsuccessfully 
tried to change his status to "dangerous offender," which would have carried a 
mandatory life sentence for the bank robbery charge, which he is also appealing.

Three people connected to Carlson have died under mysterious circumstances since he 
launched his brainwashing claim. They include Tony Vaitelis, the second male inmate to 
make claims similar to Carlson’s, an unnamed former hospital orderly and potential 
witness to prison brainwashing, and Carlson’s 30-year-old son. Moss-Sharman says 
Carlson is dangerous to Correctional Services Canada because he can name the inmates 
who died during the prison experiments and can describe what happened in the 
experimental units.41

"Insulin shock therapy" was frequently used on Ewen Cameron’s patients at Allan 
Memorial. In 1999 the widow of Yuan Woo (Jean-Paul Martineau), a former Royal Canadian 
Air Force radar technician, went public with the story of how her deceased husband had 
been the unwitting subject of "insulin shock therapy" experiments in Queen Mary’s 
Veterans Hospital in 1953. Martineau curiously changed his name to "Juan Woo" after 
being discharged. As a result of medical mistreatment, Ms. Woo says, her husband 
developed such a morbid fear of physicians, he postponed going to the doctor until he 
was near death from cancer in 1996.42

In the U.S., MC survivors and their families are hard-pressed to secure files 
documenting their claims, if indeed such records escaped the shredder years ago. Since 
1985 all litigants have been hampered by C.I.A. vs. Sims,43  a landmark U.S. Supreme 
Court decision that undergirds the CIA’s refusal to name its contract institutions and 
individual researchers on grounds of "national security."44  Only 59 CIA/military 
contract institutions and a handful of researchers consented to be publicly named in 
the 1970s when the MKULTRA program was exposed.

The most well-publicized U.S. victim of the MKULTRA experiments is Frank Olson, a 
biochemist who worked at the Army Chemical Corps’ Special Operations Division at Ft. 
Detrick, in Frederick, Maryland. On November 18, 1953, Olson was given a drink of 
Cointreau secretly laced with LSD. He immediately became agitated and severely 
paranoid, a condition that lasted for days. Olson was said to have committed suicide 
nine days later by jumping 13-stories to his death through the closed window of a New 
York hotel. Members of his family did not learn he had been drugged until 1975 when 
the MKULTRA behavior-control program was exposed. They later received an apology from 
President Gerald Ford and a $750,000 settlement.

However, after studying documents declassified in later years, Eric Olson believed his 
father may have been pushed out the window. He had the body exhumed in 1994. A group 
of private forensic researchers announced on the 41th anniversary of Olson’s death 
that both forensic and other evidence were "starkly suggestive of homicide."45  A 
second skull fracture (missed in the initial autopsy) means Olson may have been hit on 
the head before his body went through the window. Also the lack of cuts on Olson’s 
body would appear to rule out the official CIA story of his "suicide."46   Armond 
Pastore, the hotel night manager who kneeled beside the dying Olson back in 1953, 
said, "I never heard of anybody jumping through a closed window with the blind 
down."47  Last year a New York grand jury was looking at this new evidence.48

The first CIA brainwashing case to go before a jury took place in 1999. I learned 
about this civil trial through two articles in the Philadelphia Inquirer.49  This 
civil trial centered on the tragic life of up-and-coming artist Stanley Glickman, who 
says that in 1952 in a Paris cafe, MKULTRA czar Sidney Gottlieb had brought him a 
drink laced with LSD. Gottlieb denied doing this, despite admitting he had spiked the 
drinks of other unsuspecting people in the 1950s. Glickman suffered a psychological 
breakdown from which he never recovered. After collapsing he was rushed to American 
Hospital where he claimed doctors there administered electroshock therapy "via a 
catheter up his penis" as well as more hallucinogenic drugs.50

After learning about the CIA’s LSD experiments on unwitting subjects in the 1970s, 
Glickman sued in 1983. His identification of Gottlieb was based on remembering that 
the strange man in the bar had a club foot. Using the same delay-and-attrition tactics 
heaped on the nine elderly Canadians in Orlikow, the CIA was able to delay the trial 
for 16 years. Glickman died in 1992 but his sister Gloria Kronisch continued the 
lawsuit. Dominick L. DiCarlo, a conservative chief judge "on loan" from the U.S. Court 
of International Trade in New York City, presided.

What happened next will some day be the stuff of high drama in a Sleep Room-type 
teleplay exposing the CIA’s 50-year history of crimes against humanity. Finally being 
called to account in a courtroom for overseeing a quarter-century of U.S.-style Nazi 
science, Gottlieb becomes ill, causing postponement of the February trial. On the eve 
of the March date, he unexpectedly dies. Both the New York Times and the Los Angeles 
Times obituaries report that the Gottlieb family refuses to disclose the cause of his 
death. The online WorldNet Daily, however, reports that Gottlieb, 80, died after a 
"month-long bout with pneumonia." According to this story, he was admitted to the 
University of Virginia Medical Center in Charlottesburg on February 14, and "lapsed 
into a coma" on March 5 "from which he never recovered."51

Are we overly paranoid to suspect the CIA of foul play here? Did life boomerang on the 
aged Dr. Strangelove? Was this enthusiastic harvester of exotic poisons and inventor 
of bizarre assassination delivery systems somehow silenced by same to prevent his 
spilling the CIA’s dirty secrets in a court of law?52

Anyway, the trial goes forward in late March, with the Glickman estate suing the 
Gottlieb estate (the claims against Helms and the CIA had been thrown out). As the 
lawyers near their final summations, Judge DiCarlo, 71, suddenly drops dead of a heart 
attack while exercising in a federal gym located next to the court. His New York Times 
obituary makes no mention of the controversial CIA trial (nor does the Times even 
cover the trial).53  However, the New York Daily News, with more guts and pizzazz, 
reports that DiCarlo’s death "created a surreal scene as paramedics and a priest 
called to give last rites mingled with jurors preparing to decide one of the strangest 
cases being heard in the city."54  Goosebumps and paranoia strike again. Was this 
Reagan-appointed judge a victim of the CIA’s long-rumored, untraceable method of 
inducing heart attacks? Or was it the stress of a CIA trial that killed him?

Almost on cue, Federal Judge Kimba Wood was assigned to take DiCarlo’s place, a move 
prejudicial to the plaintiff since she had thrown out this case in 1997. The Second 
Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated the lawsuit in 1998.55  After closing arguments, 
the jury deliberated for seven hours before ruling against the Glickman estate.

But the evidence of foul play goes way beyond the spiking of Glickman’s drink. His 
Paris hospital records show that two of his doctors had been engaged in LSD research 
at the time. Also, CIA files from 1952 reveal a special interest in the heightened 
effect of LSD on people with hepatitis. One of Glickman’s American Hospital doctors 
had previously treated him for hepatitis, making this once-promising young artist "the 
ideal guinea pig."56

I would like to thank Lynne Moss-Sharman, Kathy Kasten, Eleanor White and Blanche 
Chavoustie for providing news articles and other research materials for this series.

Endnotes
 1. 682 F. Supp. 77, 94 (D.C. 1988) (Civ. No. 80-3153). For a summary of the federal 
court cases cited in this article , see "The Law and Mind Control: A Look at the Law 
and Government Mind Control Through Five Cases"" by Attorney Helen McGonigle 
(http://members.aol.com/smartnews/fivecases.htm)

 2. Survivor testimonies, however, can be found on the Internet: 
(http://morethanconquerors.simplenet.com/MCF/)

 3. MacLean’s, 4/21/97 (p. A3) and 1/12/98 (P. 66); The Gazette (Montreal), 3/13/97 
(p. A3) and 1/11/98 (p. C9); Toronto Star, 1/10/98 (p. SW10) and 1/11/98 (p. B7); 
Toronto Sun, 1/11/98 (TV 3); Ottawa Citizen, 1/10/98 (p. H4); CBC broadcast, "Fifth 
Estate," 1/6/98

 4. For a history of Orlikow, see "Anatomy of a Public Interest Case Against the CIA," 
by Joseph L. Rauh, Jr. and James C. Turner, Hamline Journal of Public Law and Policy, 
Vol. II (2), Fall 1990. (http://www.radix.net/~jcturner/anat-tofc.html)

 5. Collins, In the Sleep Room (Key Porter Books, 1998), pp. 94, 101-104.

 6. Joe Rauh’s lifelong history of defending victims of government abuse was 
postumously rewarded in 1994 when President Bill Clinton awarded him the Presidential 
Medal of Freedom. Rauh had died in 1992, the Canadian case against the CIA having been 
his last hurrah.

 7. Rauh and Turner, op. cit.

 8. A videotape of the ACHRE hearing is available from Missoulians for a Clean 
Environment, P.O. Box 2885, Missoula, MT 59806 (Phone: 406-543-7210). A transcript is 
posted at http://morethanconquerers.simplenet.com/MCF/ckln07.htm. Tape 14: "Giving 
testimony regarding survival as a government mind-control victim: My testimony and the 
backlash," Mullen’s presentation to the 1997 Believe the Children (BTC) Conference can 
be ordered from BTC Repeat Performance, 2911 Crabapple Lane, Hobart, IN 46342. This 
tape also includes the BTC presentation by therapist Valerie Wolf, BCSW, ACSW, BCD, 
"Assessment and treatment of survivors of sadistic abuse."

 9. Rappaport, Jon, Mind Control Experiments on Children, self-published book 
containing the supporting documentation produced by legal and medical professionals 
for the 1995 ACHRE hearings. (http://home.earthlink.net/~alto/index.html)

 10. Final Report of President’s Commission on Human Radiation Experiments (ACHRE), 
1996 (http://tis.eh.doe.gov/ohre/roadmap/achre/index.html)

 11. ACHRE Report, ibid., Chapter 10.

 12. Barrett v. U.S., 660 F.Supp. 1291 (S.D.N.Y. 1987). See Hunt, op. cit., pp. 170, 
235 for details on the Blauer case.

 13 Lifton, R.J., The Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide 
(Basic Books, 1986), pp. 289-290.

 14 See generally, Hunt, L., Secret Agenda: The United States Government, Nazi 
Scientists, and Project Paperclip, 1945 to 1990 (St. Martin’s Press, 1991).

 15 "Wonder Weapons: the Pentagon’s quest for nonlethal arms is amazing. But is it 
smart?" U.S. News and World Report, July 7, 1997.

 16 Ross, Colin, "The CIA and Military Mind Control Research: Building the Manchurian 
Candidate." A lecture given at the 9th Annual Western Clinical Conference on Trauma 
and Dissociation, April 18, 1996, Orange County, California. Transcript and/or 
audiotape can be ordered from CKLN-FM, 380 Victoria Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 
M5B 1W7 (phone 416-595-1477; fax 416-595-0226). Transcript is posted at 
http://morethanconquerers.simplenet.com/MCF/ckln01.htm.

 17. Russell, D. The Man Who Knew Too Much (Carroll & Graf, 1992), pp. 673-674.

 18. Ross, op. cit. See also George H. Estabrooks, PhD, "Hypnosis comes of age," 
Science Digest, April 1971, pp. 44-50.

 19. Russell, Dick, op. cit., pp. 193-194. According to historians Stephen Endicott 
and Edward Hagerman, The United States and Biological Warfare (Indiana University 
Press, 1999), the U.S. did use germ weapons in Korea.

 20. Scheflin, A. & Opton, Jr., E.M., The Mind Manipulators. (Paddington Press, 1978), 
p. 107.

 21. Secret report to the Eisenhower White House, quoted in Hunt, Linda, op. cit., p. 
263.

 22. "C.I.A. Documents Tell of 1954 Project to Create Involuntary Assassins," New York 
Times, February 9, 1978, p. 17.

 23. New York Times, August 2, 1977, pp. 1, 16.

 24. Foreign and Military Intelligence, Book I, Final Report of the Select Committee 
to Study Government Operations With Respect to Intelligence Activities [the "Church 
Committee" report], U.S. Senate (April 26, 1976), pp. 403-404. Quoted in Russell, op. 
cit. p. 775 (Note 12).

 25 Online version of Marks’ book: http://druglibrary.org/schaffer/lsd/marks.htm

 25. Ross, op. cit.

 27. Orlikow, op. cit., at 82.

 28 Sea, G., "The Radiation Story No One Would Touch," Columbia Journalism Review, 
March/April 1994 (http://www.cjr.org/year/94/2/radiation.asp)

29. Hunt, op. cit., p. 268.

 30. 483 U.S. 669 (1987)

 31. March 6, 1996 article provided by Lynne Moss-Sharman (newspaper not identified)

 32. Some examples from the Ottawa Citizen: "Debate over prison experimentation 
emerges from shadows," 9/28/98; "Minister demands answers on prison experiments: 
Solicitor general upset by Citizen account of inmates used as guinea pigs," 10/1/98; 
"LSD trials on inmates ‘unethical’: Ignore proposal for compensation, McGill study 
says," 10/31/98; "Military tested LSD on civilians: Canada funded Cold War probe into 
mind control," 12/7/98. From CBC Radio, "Secret experiments on Canada’s convicts," 
11/9/98. From the Toronto Star: "Prisoners used for ‘frightening’ tests, new papers 
show," 12/18/99.

 33. CBC Montreal (Ivan Slobod), 1/5/00; "Woman suing over CIA experiments," Globe and 
Mail, 1/6/00; ‘Hell for my family,’ Montreal Gazette, 1/11/00; "Shock treatment victim 
supports suit," The Daily Miner (Kenora), 1/21/00.

 34. CKLN Radio (Toronto) "Shrinkrap" interviews Dorothy Proctor and lawyer James 
Newland, August 1998; "Inmates subdued with drugs, shock therapy, report says," Globe 
and Mail, 10/31/98; Ottawa Citizen: "Burden of proof on LSD inmates: Government won’t 
compensate women without more proof that tests caused harm," 2/3/98; "LSD tested on 
female prisoners," 2/28/98; "The case for prison’s LSD tests," 3/1/98; "Pay LSD 
victims: Reform (Party): Law and Order Party calls experiments on inmates 
‘sickening’," 3/2/98; "Privacy an issue in LSD probe," 3/20/98; "LSD experiments ‘good 
research back then’," 7/10/98; "MPs demand inquiry into prison tests," 9/29/98; 
"Minister demands answers on Citizen account of inmates used as guinea pigs," 10/1/98; 
"Scott stalling LSD report, critics charge," 10/15/98; "LSD trials on inmates 
‘unethical’," 10/31/98); "Government accused of withholding files on prison LSD 
testing," 12/8/99;

 35. " ‘I was in a very bad state’- LSD guinea pig says form inmate underwent dramatic 
personality changes," Ottawa Citizen, 9/26/98.

 36. Eastgate, J., "The Case Against Electroshock Treatment," USA Today (Magazine), 
November 1998, p. 28.

 37. "75-year-old guinea pig wants to sue," Ottawa Citizen, 12/9/99.

 38. "This Morning," CBC Radio, Nov. 9, 1998. Interviewers: Avril Benoit and Rosie 
Rowbotham.

 39. In a 1997 interview on CKLN radio, Moss-Sharman recounts her own nightmare as a 
child victim of CIA/military brainwashing experiments. 
(http://morethanconquerers.simplenet.com/MCF/ckln16.htm). Also see "Mind Games: 
Another woman comes forward to claim the CIA used her as a guinea pig in hideous 
experiments," Ottawa Citizen, 9/13/97 (posted at http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~alb/misc/ 
ottawaMindControl.html)

 40. "Military tested LSD on civilians: Canada funded Cold War probe into mind 
control," Ottawa Citizen, 12/7/98.

 41. Chronical Journal (Thunder Bay, Ontario): "Carlson gets access to prison file," 
5/1/99; "Carlson case adjourns," 10/27/99; "Convicted bank robber Carlson launches 
appeal bid," 2/2/00. Two letters to the Canadian Human Rights Commission re: Carlson 
(11/9/99 from Moss-Sharman and 12/30/99 from Patty Rehn, U.S. contact for ACHES-MC) 
are available from the author upon request.

 42. " ‘The nightmares are real’: Widow blames military for man’s suffering," Ottawa 
Citizen, 10/11/99; "Was Canuck in CIA experiments? Widow wants to know why hubby 
suffered," Sun Media, 10/12/99.

 43. C.I.A. vs. Sims., 471 U.S. 159, 85 L.Ed.2d, 105 S.Ct. 1881 (1985).

 44. A revealing account of the difficulties U.S. citizens encounter in making claims 
against the government can be found in Budiansky, Goode, Gast, "The Cold War 
Experiments," U.S. News and World Report, January 24, 1994.

 45. Philadelphia Inquirer, November 29, 1994, B6.

 46. Los Angeles Times, July 13, 1994, A4

 47. The Independent (London), June 4, 1994, p. 8.

 48. Baker, R., "Conspiracy: In 1952, Stanley Glickman was a promising young painter 
studying in Paris. Then one night he shared a drink with some fellow Americans, and 
his life fell apart. Did the CIA spike his drink with LSD? The Observer (Guardian 
Newspapers Ltd.), February 14, 1999.

 49. "Case against CIA that began with ’52 encounter winds down," 4/30/99, and "Jury 
rejects suit alleging ’52 drugging," 5/1/99.

 50. Baker, op. cit.

 51. New York Times, 3/10/99 and Los Angeles Times, 4/4/99. See 
http://www.sightings.com/ufo2/ gottlieb.htm for the 3/11/99 WorldNet Daily obituary.

 52. Regarding Gottlieb’s bizarre plans to assassinate Fidel Castro and Patrice 
Lumumba, see Impact International, April 1999 
(http://www.africa2000.com/IMPACT/gottlieb.jpg)

53. "Judge Dominick L. DiCarlo, 71, Narcotics Fighter Under Reagan," New York Times, 
4/30/99, C21. A 3/10/99 Gottlieb obituary written by Tim Weiner also makes no mention 
of the Glickman trial.

 54. Daily News, April 28, 1999, p. 2.

 55. Kronisch v. U.S., 150 F.3d 112 (2d Cir. 1988). Posted on New Jersey Law Journal 
website: http://www.nylj.com/nyljcontent/072298dd.htm.

 56. Baker, op. cit.




_____________________________________________________________
Email your boss can't read - sign up for free disinfo.net email
at http://www.disinfo.com, your gateway to the underground

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to