-Caveat Lector-

Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish.
                   -- Euripides

PART III
Pedophile Confab


Cal State’s Pedophile Confab
by William F. Jasper

‘‘I recently spent a day in Hell," says Dr. Dennis Jarrard. No, the good
doctor was not straitjacketed in a movie theater and force-fed a 24-hour run
of South Park — while handcuffed to Hillary Clinton and Larry Flynt. But
that’s close. Actually, Dr. Jarrard’s testimony about his ordeal in Hades
first came to light a year ago, after he had attended the World Pornography
Conference in Los Angeles, an event co-sponsored by the Center for Sex
Research at the California State University-Northridge (CSUN).

The three-day global porn confab in August 1998 and the slimy connection of
the porn racket to academe was the subject of intense scrutiny by the Joint
Legislative Audit Committee of the California State Senate on July 6th of
this year. The hearing, which received scant media attention, was important
for demonstrating a number of crucial truths about grand strategy, tactics,
battlefield landscape, imminent threats, and the correlation of forces in
the ongoing culture war.

Democrat Evolution

The legislative hearing came about because of the efforts of conservative
Republican State Senator Raymond Haynes of Riverside, who had been apprised
of the conference by concerned constituents. What surprised many insiders in
Sacramento was the transformation of the Democratic committee members as the
hearings unfolded. Like their White House boon companion, Bill Clinton,
California Democrats have been major beneficiaries of the
Hustler-Playboy-Penthouse political largesse and have not been the least
queasy about rubbing elbows with the Hollywood sexploiters and the radical
homosexual lobby. And in the past few years they have become increasingly
chummy with the hardcore porn "industry," allowing the San Fernando Valley
to become the world capital of porn video production. Under Clinton, federal
prosecution of pornography offenses, such as interstate commerce and postal
crimes, have taken a steep dive and "adult" entertainment production has
exploded, as the Larry Flynts of the world have been metamorphosed by the
ACLU-Tinseltown con artists into poster children for the First Amendment.
But the arrogant excesses of the militant hedonists proved too much even for
the political libertines.

When Senator Haynes charged that the "academic conference" was in effect a
CSUN-subsidized trade show to promote and legitimize the pornography
industry, the liberal Democrats who control the committee not only rallied
to his cry, but took the lead in denouncing the publicly funded CSUN’s
sponsorship of a program to promote the abuse of women and children. Senator
Steve Pease (D-Chula Vista) was outraged that CSUN’s chancellor failed to
appear to defend the university’s conduct. He easily gained committee
approval to force CSUN to foot the cost of the estimated $50,000 it would
take for state auditors to investigate the conference funding. Senator
Richard Alarcon, a Democrat in whose district Northridge is located, noted
that he had recently delivered the commencement address at CSUN and angrily
stated that "for the first time in 18 years I’m embarrassed to be a graduate
of Cal State Northridge." Moreover, said Alarcon, "this very, very liberal"
senator was sending a message to the Cal State chancellor that he is
appalled by this "stain on the university system" and the willingness of
academia to "get in bed with the porn industry."

The unethical and illegal use of university funds, personnel, equipment, and
resources to promote a private trade show — and a porno conference at that —
was only one of the factors that set the Sacramento politicians fuming. What
put them over the top was the revelation of the prominence of notorious
pedophile/pederast/child porn advocates and defenders at the CSUN-sponsored
event. Aside from "seminars" on such high-brow intellectual fare as "Visual
and Carnal Pleasures of Hardcore Pornography," "Women and Pornography:
Victims or Visionaries," and "What Sex Offenders Think About Pornography,"
there were also sessions such as the one titled, "Child Pornography:
Forbidden Thoughts and Images in an Erotic Landscape," presented by Dr.
Ralph Underwager, an aggressive pedophile supporter. Underwager, who
masquerades as a Lutheran pastor, is a founder of the Institute for
Psychological Therapies in Northfield, Minnesota. Together with his wife and
fellow sexpert, Hollida Wakefield, he edits a quarterly journal, Issues in
Child Abuse Accusations.

In 1993, Underwager was interviewed by Paidika, the infamous Dutch journal
of pedophilia. Paidika asked: "Is choosing pedophilia for you a responsible
choice for the individual?" To which Underwager replied: "Certainly it is
responsible.... Pedophiles can boldly and courageously affirm what they
choose. They can say what they want is to find the best way to love. I am
also a theologian and as a theologian, I believe it is God’s will that there
be closeness and intimacy, unity of the flesh, between people...."
Underwager declared that "pedophiles need to become more positive and make
the claim that pedophilia is an acceptable expression of God’s will for love
and unity among human beings."

Unfortunately, the perverse sanctimony of "Pastor" Underwager and similar
frauds goes virtually unchallenged today in academia. The joint legislative
committee was particularly perturbed because the obscene bilge delivered by
Underwager was not some strange anomaly that crept unbidden into the
conference. In testimony before the committee, Dr. Judith Reisman, author of
the important study Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences, presented documentation
showing that the gathering was a full-fledged pedophile confab.

Who’s Who of Pedophiles

The founder of CSUN’s Center for Sex Research and the sex guru emeritus at
the conference was Dr. Vern L. Bullough, a self-admitted pedophile and an
editor of the Journal of Pedophilia. Bullough wrote the introduction to the
pedophile handbook Loving Boys: A Multidisciplinary Study in Two Volumes of
Sexual Relations Between Adults and Minor Males, by the Dutch pedophile and
former "jurist" Dr. Edward Brongersma.

Other porn conference "faculty" included pedophile champions John DeCecco,
Daniel Tsang, and Wayne Dynes. Mr. DeCecco, an "out" pedophile, is head of
the San Francisco State University Sex Research Center, which competes with
its CSUN counterpart for the title of Left Coast Kinsey Institute. Tsang is
the editor of The Age of Taboo, published by the homosexual Alyson
Publishers. One Age of Taboo essay by radical, femi-Leninist Kate Millet
claims that "one of children’s essential rights is to express themselves
sexually, probably primarily with each other but with adults as well. So the
sexual freedom of children is an important part of a sexual revolution." Mr.
Dynes, like DeCecco and Tsang, is a pedophile and an editor of the Journal
of Pedophilia.

Joining this vile pedophile professoriate was Ted McIlvenna of the Institute
for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality. This is the same institute that
published McIlvenna’s kiddie porn photos under the mantle of "science" in
his book Meditations on the Gift of Sexuality. Then McIlvenna and the
Institute turned around and sold the photos to Hustler magazine for use in a
pro-incest article. It was at this same "distinguished" institute that James
Elias, the current director of CSUN’s Sex Research Center, earned his
doctorate on "Adolescent Exposure to Erotica."

Additional honored participants included the exalted "Trinity" of porn
lawyers, H. Louis Sirkin (Penthouse), Burton Joseph (Playboy), and Herald
Price Fahringer (Hustler). All three of these champions for degeneracy have
defended the basest child pornography, with Fahringer arguing all the way to
the Supreme Court in favor of pornography using children of any age,
including "simulated or real sexual intercourse," "sadomasochistic abuse,"
and "sexual bestiality." Also appearing was the ACLU’s Nadine Strossen,
bleating the ludicrous theme that the sorry specimens populating this
pervert menagerie were heroic exemplars in the tradition of our Founding
Fathers, upholding precious American ideals. Appropriately, according to one
observer, Ms. Strossen stood signing autographs cheek to jowl with Al
Goldstein, editor of Screw magazine, one of the few porn mags (we’ve been
told) that can boast with some justification to topping Larry Flynt’s
Hustler for crudity and depravity. Yes, this is the same Nadine Strossen who
is regularly presented to millions of television viewers by Ted Koppel, Dan
Rather, Jim Lehrer, and Tom Brokaw as the demure, brave, compassionate hero
of the oppressed and articulate defender of liberty. As the CSUN pedo-porn
palaver showed, the ACLU is joined at the hip with the meanest of predatory
creatures who callously victimize the most innocent and vulnerable members
of society.

In the tradition of Alfred Kinsey, the groves of academe are providing a
bevy of bearded, tweedy professors to construct intellectual and legal
defenses for the commercial child molesters. Among the numerous professors
who mingled with the pornography stars, starlets, and producers were: Harris
Mirkin, political scientist from the University of Missouri-Kansas City;
philosopher David Austin of North Carolina University (a panelist on "The
Role of Fetishism"); film scholar Peter Lehman from the University of
Arizona; Ed Donnerstein of the University of California-Santa Barbara;
William Griffit of Kansas State University; and Jay Lorenz of the University
of California-Irvine.

Pressing for "Rights"

A recent study by the Family Research Council, "Homosexual Activists Work to
Lower the Age of Sexual Consent," outlines in alarming detail the aggressive
program of the sexual liberationists to eradicate all protections against
the sexual abuse and exploitation of children, and to legitimize the
pedophile agenda in media, entertainment, and academic circles. Dr. Reisman,
in her committee testimony, pointed out that the CSUN porn festival was also
co-sponsored by the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality (SSSS) and
the American Association of Sex Educators and Counselors (AASEC), two of the
leading transmitters of Kinseyite sex education programs into the public
schools. Many SSSS and AASEC leaders are on record as paid consultants to
the billion-dollar pornography industry, and their pro-incest, pro-pedophile
materials are already finding their way into school sex ed curricula.

Pedophilia is still considered so abhorrent a crime that most people cannot
even imagine that such a revolting practice could ever become accepted as a
"right" in America. But a generation ago the same was thought of abortion
and the "unspeakable vice" of homosexuality. The degenerate lobby is using
the same practiced methods that proved so successful in legitimizing those
crimes. They are assembling corrupt, prostitute academics to provide
intellectual cover for their criminality. And they are talking up
"adult-child love" to soften public opposition to pedophilia. In this, they
are following the plan outlined by homosexual strategists Marshall Kirk and
Hunter Madsen in their manifesto, entitled After the Ball: How America Will
Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90s.

"Application of the keep-talking principle can get people to the
shoulder-shrug stage," wrote Kirk and Madsen. "The free and frequent
discussion of gay rights by a variety of persons in a variety of places
gives the impression that homosexuality is commonplace." Even the religious
"bigots" and "intransigents" who do not "embrace" gay culture, noted Kirk
and Madsen, will begin to feel more and more isolated and more reticent when
it comes to expressing disapproval. And the hardcore conservative "may still
shake his head and think, ‘People are crazy these days,’ but in time his
objections will become more reflective, more philosophical, less emotional."

Is it possible that Americans could be desensitized to the "shoulder-shrug
stage" concerning pedophilia? Absolutely. Especially considering the moral
corrosion the sex deviates have already exercised on our younger generations
through pop culture, media, and education. But the response of the
California legislative committee shows that it is still possible to appeal
to decency and to awaken righteous indignation and outrage against
obscenity.

Pedophilia must remain an utter abomination. And the facile politicians,
entertainers, and academics who rise in its defense must be subjected to the
same scorn and revulsion as David Duke when he rises in defense of racism
and the Ku Klux Klan.



 © Copyright 1999 American Opinion Publishing Incorporated

 http://thenewamerican.com/tna/1999/08-30-99/vo15no18_cal.htm

Bard

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to