from:alt.politics.org.covert
As, always, Caveat Lector
Om
K
-----
Click Here: <A HREF="aol://5863:126/alt.politics.org.covert:7737">Ramsey DA
silenced testimony on pedophilia</A>
-----
Subject: Ramsey DA silenced testimony on pedophilia
From: Evan Ravitz <A HREF="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
Date: Sat, May 13, 2000 2:26 PM
Message-id: <8fkh9c$jaj$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

 I have lived in Boulder 21 years, and my friend Bob McFarland for some
40. We tried to give testimony to the Ramsey grand jury but were
thwarted by DA Alex Hunter, illegally. Here is my 4/29/00 guest
editorial in the Boulder Daily Camera, with the paragraph they edited
out, the 3rd to last. Note our web site at <A HREF="http://vote.org/ramsey">ht
tp://vote.org/ramsey</A>

'Nothing is what it seems' in Ramsey case
by Evan Ravitz

When Ramsey case lead investigators Det. Cmdr. Tom Wickman and Det. Tom
Trujillo interviewed myself and Robert McFarland, MD, co-founder of
Boulder's Parenting Place for an hour at my home last May 5, Detective
Wickman remarked "Nothing is what it seems in this case." Here are
several examples that have not received media coverage, yet:

DA Alex Hunter concluded his recent retirement statement by saying,
regarding the Ramsey case: "I believe most people feel their district
attorney has done right by the law." Mr. Hunter did not say he followed
the law, only that people think he did. He did not follow this law:

Colorado Revised Statute 16-5-204 (l) states "Any person may approach
the prosecuting attorney or the grand jury and request to testify or
retestify in an inquiry before a grand jury or to appear before a grand
jury." Dr. McFarland and I, after discovering that Dr. McFarland's
mailings to the jury foreman had been intercepted, sent material
directly to jury members at their homes on June 28. For thus exercising
our right under Colorado law to "approach" our fellow citizens the
grand  jury, we were threatened with prosecution for Contempt of Court!
And ridiculed by editor Hartman of this newspaper.

It was not until September 23rd that I read the above law myself. The
Colorado ACLU Intake Director told me on October 8 that they would take
our case, although this was too late to be of use, with the grand jury
about to disband. Perhaps there will be another. But valuable time has
been lost. The Denver Post reported on 3/15/00 that Hunter also tried
to keep his own investigator Lou Smit away from the grand jury until
Smit sought a court order to enforce the above law!

Our evidence is similar to that which the woman from San Luis Obispo,
California and her therapist have been giving Boulder police in recent
weeks, featured in a long lead article (by editor Hartman) on February
25, and others since, relating to a pedophile ring having abused and
killed JonBenet.

At Hunter's press conference on October 14th, investigative journalist
Joe Calhoun (who shares in an Academy award for the documentary The
Panama Deception) asked why Dr. McFarland and I had been repeatedly
prevented from contacting the grand jury, in spite of the law. Hunter
replied that a judge's order (Daniel Hale's) forbade us, which seemed
to satisfy the media. Yet, every lawyer knows that even judges and DAs
must obey state laws. Why would these leaders of Boulder's justice
system deem it so important to keep us from the grand jury that they
would repeatedly violate this law?

The substance of our testimony to the police and what we still want
investigated is what it seems Hunter most wanted to avoid: the
possibility that accused pedophiles in very high places in Boulder -we
suggested two names- had both motive and means to de-rail the
investigation in the first hours, possibly by calling off the FBI.  The
motive would be to keep the wide-ranging spotlight of a media case like
this away from people like themselves, whether they were involved or
not.

Normally, the FBI would immediately assume jurisdiction over an
apparent kidnapping by "a small foreign faction" (so read the "ransom
note") of the child of a Defense contractor executive. (Lockheed-Martin
owned Access Graphics.) Detective Linda Arndt has stated that she asked
for the FBI and police backup before she even arrived at the Ramsey
home and was told no. This left her unable to control a crime scene
filled with suspects and their friends. When she repeated her request
she was told everyone was in a meeting. Why would police administration
repeatedly refuse to provide backup and FBI assistance in such
circumstances?

Tom Wickman made another curious comment to Dr. McFarland and I, and
independently to Stephen Singular, author of "Presumed Guilty: An
Investigation into the JonBenet Ramsey Case, the Media, and the Culture
of Pornography" (on page 217). Tom said that once he was "getting
close" to arresting a Boulder City Council member, but had been told
to "back off." Since Tom was legally prohibited from giving us any
clues about the Ramsey investigation, I feel he was repeatedly drawing
an analogy, by way of saying that he'd heard the pedophile-coverup
story before and had been told to back off from investigating that.

Hunter made a little Freudian slip under the pressure of the October 14
press conference, in the first 2 minutes. He referred to "grand
secrecy," apparently meaning to say "grand jury secrecy." In this case
the grand jury didn't have to keep the secrets Dr. McFarland and I had
to relate. Hunter and his assistants kept those secrets from the grand
jury. They also prevented Cina Wong, Vice-President of the National
Board of Document Examiners, from testifying. Why the "grand secrecy,"
Mr. Hunter?

What makes the case important is not that JonBenet was cute and her
parents rich, but what it says about the legal system in our town and
beyond. My attorney David Lane calls it the "just us" system. You can
read most of our documents and related material at vote.org/ramsey.

Evan Ravitz
Evan was voted "Best Activist" by readers of the Daily Camera



--
 Evan Ravitz (303)440-6838  evan (you know) vote.org
Voted "Best Activist" by Boulder Daily Camera readers
The Direct Democracy Initiative:  <A HREF="http://vote.org">http://vote.org</A
>
Home (Boulder, Colorado USA):     <A HREF="http://vote.org/ravitz">http://vote
.org/ravitz</A>

-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
All My Relations.
Omnia Bona Bonis,
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths,
misdirections
and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and
minor
effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said,
CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
<A HREF="http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to