In a message dated 07/19/2000 7:23:29 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This sets Nader apart from most of those liberals who only affect to despise
or oppose the "bipartisan" monopoly. Faced with the question, How corrupt and
lawless can a man be and still be President,
In a message dated 7/20/00 12:20:14 PM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
We all know more
about what Clinton did than we really wanted to know. What we can't figure
out is why it was so awful when Clinton did it, and no problem at all for all
the rest
I agree with you
There are a number of persuasive reasons to cast a vote for Ralph Nader in
the fall, and a number of unpersuasive reasons, too. But the principal
argument in favor is this: On the 22nd of May last, Nader said without
equivocation that if he had been a Congressman he would have voted to impeach
