-Caveat Lector-
>From www.wsws.org
WSWS : News & Analysis : Europe
Danish government toughens laws for foreigners
By Helmut Arens
5 February 2002
Back to screen version| Send this link by email | Email the author
Only 50 days after taking office, Denmark’s new right-wing
conservative government—a minority coalition of Venstre (liberals)
and the Conservative People’s Party, supported by the extreme
xenophobic Danish People’s Party (DPP)—has confirmed the worst fears
about the new government’s course.
Following a crassly xenophobic campaign in the run-up to the
elections—above all, by Venstre and the DDP—Venstre’s Bertel Haarder,
the minister responsible for refugees, immigration and integration of
foreigners, announced the tabling of a bill on January 17, which will
result in a drastic deterioration of conditions for refugees and
immigrants.
The government is making no secret of its intention “to limit the number of refugees
entering Denmark and to sharpen demands that they support themselves without state
support once in the country”. Haarder made the econom
ically motivated reasons for the government’s course patently obvious when he said:
“These days foreigners are a burden on society. They cost more than they are worth to
the country. That will have to change.”
In line with this, the government is also planning an easing of immigration policy in
one respect. Through the introduction of a Green Card system for hand-picked
immigrants, it is intent on buttressing Denmark’s prosperi
ty by bringing qualified foreign workers into the country. This led the German
newspaper Taz to comment: “Anyone who isn’t a white, Christian computer expert with
fluent Danish shouldn’t bother to show his face.”
In particular, the following regulations are to be adopted:
According to Haarders, a decisive means of reducing the number of asylum-seekers
coming into the country will be the scrapping of the concept of a “de facto refugee”.
Up until now many asylum-seekers, having no chance of
gaining admittance to most other EU countries, have been granted entry into Denmark
under this category. The government’s 10-page white paper claims that “this will
constitute an essential and principled tightening of the
conditions for the granting of asylum, which the government considers necessary.”
Measures will also be adopted to prevent refugees from becoming residents. Unlike
previously, they will no longer receive permanent reside
ncy after three years, but will normally have to return to their own country.
In future, the right to permanent residency will only be granted after at least seven
years. Moreover, refugees will be subject to travel restrictions. Whoever makes a
visit to his former homeland runs the risk of being d
eprived of his residency permit.
The government also plans to make the process for acquiring Danish citizenship more
difficult for foreigners. Obtaining citizenship will only be possible after eight
years of uninterrupted residency. Further prerequisites
include learning the Danish language and attending integration courses. On top of
this, claims to social security will not be permitted.
Rejected asylum-seekers are to be extradited within 24 hours, regardless of any legal
challenge to the rejection order.
Another important measure, viewed by numerous critics as an offence against
international norms, is the proposal to allow married partners to be reunited in
Denmark only when both are older than 24 years of age. A further
condition prohibits any access to social support for such cases. Parents older than
60 will no longer be allowed to join their families living in the country.
Welfare aid for refugees and immigrants is to be drastically reduced. Foreigners will
have the right to claim full benefits only after seven years of residence. Labour
Minister Claus Hjort Frederiksen defended this propos
al as follows: “Foreigners coming into Denmark should know from the very beginning
that they are expected to find work. This is not the land of milk and honey where you
can simply lie under a palm tree and enjoy life. The
se new proposals should be an incentive for such people to accept even low-paid jobs.”
These remarks are particularly cynical in view of the fact that there is scarcely any
labour market in Europe which is so thoroughly insulated against foreigners as in
Denmark. Non-white youth with foreign sounding names,
even if they have grown up in Denmark and speak fluent Danish, have virtually no
chance of finding an apprenticeship or a job.
Andreas Kam, general secretary of the Danish council for refugees, addressed another
aspect of the government’s policy. He pointed out that, if more people can be induced
to take up jobs by cutting their social benefits,
why should not the same conditions sooner or later be set for Danes?
The government wants to aid its offensive against the fundamental democratic rights of
immigrants and refugees by blocking its critics’ sources of finance. It intends to
reduce or cut completely financial support for nume
rous refugee and human rights organisations. The renowned International Centre for
Human Rights, which until now has upheld Denmark’s reputation in the struggle for
human rights, will also be affected. United Nations Comm
issioner for Human Rights Mary Robinson criticised this policy decision in a letter to
Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen: “Presumably less democratic governments in other
parts of the world will take it as a welcome op
portunity to hold back progress in human rights.”
The social-democratic opposition denounced the plans as an ideological campaign and a
“massacre” and is being supported in its criticism by a number of experts. It is
claimed that the government is concerned less with cut
ting costs than with being able to secure complete control over all sections of
society. Currently some of the commissions, experts and lobby groups are regarded by
the government as constituting uncontrollable potential
for the criticism it is seeking to eliminate.
Pia Kjaersgaard, chairperson of the xenophobic DPP whose votes should help the package
of laws achieve a majority in parliament, greeted the proposals enthusiastically and
described their advent as “a milestone” and an “i
mportant day in the history of Denmark”. It is no wonder that she should think so,
under conditions where her own policies are being implemented even without her party
being directly involved in government.
Although the government’s plans will greatly please the right-wing nationalist
governments in Vienna and Rome, they have met with sharp criticism from refugee
organisations, opposition politicians and also from abroad. Th
e talk is of a “barbed-wire fence being set up around Denmark.” Mona Sahlin, the
Swedish minister for integration, called the Danish proposals “shameful”.
Elisabeth Arnold, spokesperson for the Radical Liberals (Radikale Venstre),
characterised the proposals as “xenophobic”, while Ritt Bjerregard of the Social
Democrats called them “quite repulsive”. Her party colleague Bri
tta Christensen, the mayor of a suburb of Kopenhagen, said, “They are utterly
outrageous and based on a shocking view of human nature.”
The criticism from the Social Democrats would have been more convincing had they not
themselves expressed the same conception of human nature during their time in
governmental office and up to the election two months ago.
Karen Jespersen, the interior minister at the time, wanted to intern criminal
asylum-seekers on a remote island and announced that she never wanted to live in a
multicultural society. And Poul Nyrup Rasmussen, the social
-democratic prime minister, had assured his fellow citizens that the Danes under his
government would no longer “have to feel like strangers in their own land” and that
Denmark would not become a multiethnic country under
any circumstances.
However, the criticism of the Social Democrats has also turned out to be quite
guarded. Some aspects of the proposals were regarded as inhuman, others as good. After
all, the Social Democrats themselves had already tabled
an even more restrictive asylum policy during the election campaign, which was
dominated by the issue of immigration policy.
Copyright 1998-2001
World Socialist Web Site
All rights reserved
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
A merely fallen enemy may rise again, but the reconciled
one is truly vanquished. -Johann Christoph Schiller,
German Writer (1759-1805)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers."
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
